Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

UCL Press eBooks

Weird physics:

Published Oct 6, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2307/j.ctv2qnx59x.8

Related papers

How Weird Is It?

Sadri Hassani

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Strange Physics

TULLIO BRESSANI

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

The Weirdness Theorem and the Origin of Quantum Paradoxes

Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon A

Abstract We argue that there is a simple, unique, reason for all quantum paradoxes, and that such a reason is not uniquely related to quantum theory. It is rather a mathematical question that arises at the intersection of logic, probability, and computation. We give our ‘weirdness theorem’ that characterises the conditions under which the weirdness will show up. It shows that whenever logic has bounds due to the algorithmic nature of its tasks, then weirdness arises in the special form of negative probabilities or non-classical evaluation functionals. Weirdness is not logical inconsistency, however. It is only the expression of the clash between an unbounded and a bounded view of computation in logic. We discuss the implication of these results for quantum mechanics, arguing in particular that its interpretation should ultimately be computational rather than exclusively physical. We develop in addition a probabilistic theory in the real numbers that exhibits the phenomenon of entanglement, thus concretely showing that the latter is not specific to quantum mechanics.

Foundations of Physics•Sep 28, 2021•3 citations

Beyond maths to meaning

Brian Clegg

Everybody knows that quantum physics is weird, right? Indeed, quantum physicist Richard Feynman once said in a lecture: "The theory of quantum electrodynamics describes Nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense." Beyond Weird: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Quantum Physics is Different by Philip Ball presents a refreshing challenge to this viewpoint.

Physics World•Apr 1, 2018•0 citations

Physics.

Nature•Oct 10, 1931•0 citations

Physics

Jürgen Jost

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations
Abstract We argue that there is a simple, unique, reason for all quantum paradoxes, and that such a reason is not uniquely related to quantum theory. It is rather a mathematical question that arises at the intersection of logic, probability, and computation. We give our ‘weirdness theorem’ that characterises the conditions under which the weirdness will show up. It shows that whenever logic has bounds due to the algorithmic nature of its tasks, then weirdness arises in the special form of negative probabilities or non-classical evaluation functionals. Weirdness is not logical inconsistency, however. It is only the expression of the clash between an unbounded and a bounded view of computation in logic. We discuss the implication of these results for quantum mechanics, arguing in particular that its interpretation should ultimately be computational rather than exclusively physical. We develop in addition a probabilistic theory in the real numbers that exhibits the phenomenon of entanglement, thus concretely showing that the latter is not specific to quantum mechanics.