Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Density Functional Theory

Reiner M. Dreizler, Eberhard K. U. Gross

Published Jan 1, 1990• 2,578 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-86105-5

Related papers

Pair density functional theory — a generalized density functional theory

P. Ziesche

Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 1994•110 citations

Density Functional Theory

Joachim Alexander Maruhn, P.‐G. Reinhard, E. Suraud

Springer eBooks•Nov 12, 2009•40 citations

Approximations based on density-matrix embedding theory for density-functional theories

Iris Theophilou, Teresa E. Reinhard, Ángel Rubio +1 more

Abstract Recently a novel approach to find approximate exchange–correlation functionals in density-functional theory was presented (Mordovina et al 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 5209), which relies on approximations to the interacting wave function using density-matrix embedding theory (DMET). This approximate interacting wave function is constructed by using a projection determined by an iterative procedure that makes parts of the reduced density matrix of an auxiliary system the same as the approximate interacting density matrix. If only the diagonal of both systems are connected this leads to an approximation of the interacting-to-non-interacting mapping of the Kohn–Sham approach to density-functional theory. Yet other choices are possible and allow to connect DMET with other density-functional theories such as kinetic-energy density functional theory or reduced density-matrix functional theory. In this work we give a detailed review of the basics of the DMET procedure from a density-functional perspective and show how both approaches can be used to supplement each other. We do not present a specific realization of combining density-functional methods with DMET but rather provide common grounds to facilitate future developments that encompass both approaches. We do so explicitly for the case of a one-dimensional lattice system, as this is the simplest setting where we can apply DMET and the one that was originally presented. Among others we highlight how the mappings of density-functional theories can be used to identify uniquely defined auxiliary systems and projections in DMET and how to construct approximations for different density-functional theories using DMET inspired projections. Such alternative approximation strategies become especially important for density-functional theories that are based on non-linearly coupled observables such as kinetic-energy density-functional theory, where the Kohn–Sham fields are no longer obtainable by functional differentiation of an energy expression, or for reduced density-matrix functional theories, where a straightforward Kohn–Sham construction is not feasible.

arXiv:2103.02027•Electronic Structure•Jul 20, 2021•3 citations

Quantum Theory: Density, Condensation, and Bonding

Mihai V. Putz

Primer Density Functional Theory Basics of Density Functional Theory (DFT) Physical Realizations of DFT Popular Density Functionals of Energy Chemical Realization of DFT Primer Density Functional Bose-Einstein Condensation Theory Basics of the Bose-Einstein Condensation (BEC) PSI-Density Functional Theory of Bose-Einstein Condensation Modern Quantum Theories of Chemical Bonding Bondonic Picture of Chemical Bond Chemical Action Picture of Chemical Bond Fermionic-Bosonic Picture of Chemical Bond

•Jul 27, 2012•17 citations

DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY

G. F. Bertsch, Kazuhiro Yabana

Series on advances in quantum many-body theory•Aug 1, 2002•6 citations

Action Density Functional Theory

Jaime Keller

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations
Abstract Recently a novel approach to find approximate exchange–correlation functionals in density-functional theory was presented (Mordovina et al 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 5209), which relies on approximations to the interacting wave function using density-matrix embedding theory (DMET). This approximate interacting wave function is constructed by using a projection determined by an iterative procedure that makes parts of the reduced density matrix of an auxiliary system the same as the approximate interacting density matrix. If only the diagonal of both systems are connected this leads to an approximation of the interacting-to-non-interacting mapping of the Kohn–Sham approach to density-functional theory. Yet other choices are possible and allow to connect DMET with other density-functional theories such as kinetic-energy density functional theory or reduced density-matrix functional theory. In this work we give a detailed review of the basics of the DMET procedure from a density-functional perspective and show how both approaches can be used to supplement each other. We do not present a specific realization of combining density-functional methods with DMET but rather provide common grounds to facilitate future developments that encompass both approaches. We do so explicitly for the case of a one-dimensional lattice system, as this is the simplest setting where we can apply DMET and the one that was originally presented. Among others we highlight how the mappings of density-functional theories can be used to identify uniquely defined auxiliary systems and projections in DMET and how to construct approximations for different density-functional theories using DMET inspired projections. Such alternative approximation strategies become especially important for density-functional theories that are based on non-linearly coupled observables such as kinetic-energy density-functional theory, where the Kohn–Sham fields are no longer obtainable by functional differentiation of an energy expression, or for reduced density-matrix functional theories, where a straightforward Kohn–Sham construction is not feasible.