Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Synthesis lectures on quantum computing

Quantum Finite State Automata

Jarosław Adam Miszczak

Published Jan 1, 2012• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-02516-7_3

Related papers

Quantum Implementation of Finite State Automata

Varun Puram, Krishnageetha Karuppasamy, K. M. George +1 more

Lecture notes in networks and systems•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Mathematical logic and quantum finite state automata

Ilze Dzelme-Bērziņa

Theoretical Computer Science•Mar 1, 2009•6 citations

One-Way Finite Automata with Quantum and Classical States

Shenggen Zheng, Daowen Qiu, Lvzhou Li +1 more

arXiv:1112.2022•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2012•33 citations

Two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states

Andris Ambainis, John Watrous

arXiv:cs/9911009•Theoretical Computer Science•Sep 1, 2002•169 citations

QUANTUM FINITE AUTOMATA

Jozef Gruska, Roland Vollmar

International Colloquium on Words, Languages and Combinatorics•Jul 1, 2003•0 citations

The Emptiness Problem for Quantum Finite Automata with Classical States

Jyun-Ao Lin, Patrick Totzke, Yun Chen Tsai +1 more

Quantum Finite Automata with Classical states (QFACs) are nondeterministic finite automata over a finite alphabet of quantum operations. We study expressiveness of this model on finite words and the corresponding emptiness problem. We show that regular languages are incomparable with those definable by Quantum Finite Automata (QFAs) and that both are strictly subsumed by QFAC-definable languages. We show that the emptiness problem for a QFAC can be reduced to the emptiness of the language intersection of a QFA and a finite automaton. This intersection is known to be decidable for strict thresholds but undecidable for non-strict cases. Furthermore, we consider the problem for flat QFACs, a restriction where the underlying automata contain no nested loops, and relate it to the higher-dimensional orbit problem, a long-standing open challenge in dynamical systems. Finally, we propose a sound and semi-complete witness searching procedure to verify the non-emptiness of one-loop QFACs, which are sufficiently expressive to represent some prominent quantum algorithms, such as Grover's search and quantum random walks.

arXiv:2608.29319•Aug 29, 2026•0 citations
Quantum Finite Automata with Classical states (QFACs) are nondeterministic finite automata over a finite alphabet of quantum operations. We study expressiveness of this model on finite words and the corresponding emptiness problem. We show that regular languages are incomparable with those definable by Quantum Finite Automata (QFAs) and that both are strictly subsumed by QFAC-definable languages. We show that the emptiness problem for a QFAC can be reduced to the emptiness of the language intersection of a QFA and a finite automaton. This intersection is known to be decidable for strict thresholds but undecidable for non-strict cases. Furthermore, we consider the problem for flat QFACs, a restriction where the underlying automata contain no nested loops, and relate it to the higher-dimensional orbit problem, a long-standing open challenge in dynamical systems. Finally, we propose a sound and semi-complete witness searching procedure to verify the non-emptiness of one-loop QFACs, which are sufficiently expressive to represent some prominent quantum algorithms, such as Grover's search and quantum random walks.