We derive the quantum limit for discriminating between M≥2 incoherent, diffraction-limited objects and identify a quantum-optimal measurement that can distinguish two orders of magnitude more objects than direct imaging with no additional error.
We consider imaging tasks involving discrimination between known objects and investigate the best possible accuracy with which the correct object can be identified. Using the quantum Chernoff bound, we analytically find the ultimate achievable asymptotic error rate for symmetric hypothesis tests between \emph{any} two incoherent 2D objects when the imaging system is dominated by optical diffraction. Furthermore, we show that linear-optical demultiplexing of the spatial modes of the collected light exactly saturates this ultimate performance limit, enabling a quadratic improvement over the asymptotic error rate achieved by direct imaging as the objects become more severely diffraction-limited. We extend our results to identify the quantum limit and optimal measurement for discrimination between an arbitrary number of candidate objects. Our work constitutes a complete theoretical treatment of the ultimate quantitative limits on passive, sub-diffraction, incoherent object discrimination and is readily applicable to a multitude of real-world applications.
For more than a century, the diffraction limit has defined the resolution achievable by passive optical imaging systems. Although some resolution improvement can be gained through classical data processing of the image, it is limited by the noise arising from quantum nature of light. Minimizing the effect of this noise requires quantum treatment of optical imaging. By reformulating imaging as a problem of quantum measurement and estimation, it becomes possible to identify optimal detection strategies that recover spatial information previously thought inaccessible. This review summarizes the theoretical framework that underpins this development, from the formulation of quantum Cramer-Rao bounds and Chernoff bounds to the construction of receivers that attain them, such as those based on spatial-mode demultiplexing. We show how these methods can beat conventional imaging in the classification, localization, and imaging of sub-Rayleigh incoherent sources. We then discuss extensions to multiparameter and partially coherent scenarios, and highlight the unifying connections between estimation and discrimination tasks. Finally, we survey recent experimental demonstrations that approach quantum-limited resolution and outline emerging applications in microscopy, astronomy, and optical sensing.
We consider passive imaging tasks involving discrimination between known candidate objects and investigate the best possible accuracy with which the correct object can be identified. We analytically compute quantum-limited error bounds for hypothesis tests on any library of incoherent, quasimonochromatic objects when the imaging system is dominated by optical diffraction. We further show that object-independent linear-optical spatial processing of the collected light exactly achieves these ultimate error rates, exhibiting scaling superior to spatially resolved direct imaging as the scene becomes more severely diffraction limited. We apply our results to example imaging scenarios and find conditions under which superresolution object discrimination can be physically realized.
In a previous paper [M. Tsang, Phys. Rev. A 99, 012305 (2019)], I proposed a quantum limit to the estimation of object moments in subdiffraction incoherent optical imaging. In this sequel, I prove the quantum limit rigorously by infinite-dimensional analysis. A key to the proof is the choice of an unfavorable parametric submodel to give a bound for the semiparametric problem. By generalizing the quantum limit for a larger class of moments, I also prove that the measurement method of spatial-mode demultiplexing with just one or two modes is able to achieve the quantum limit. For comparison, I derive a classical bound for direct imaging using the parametric-submodel approach, which suggests that direct imaging is substantially inferior.