Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Elsevier eBooks

Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Machine Learning

Published Sep 24, 2022• 42 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/c2020-0-03124-5

Related papers

Advanced Quantum Chemistry: Some thoughts about DFT and machine learning

Emmanuel Fromager

•Nov 27, 2020•0 citations

Machine Learning in Quantum-Dot Computational Chemistry: Challenges and Opportunities

Ivan Infante

MATSUS Spring Conference•Dec 15, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Machine Learning in Chemistry and Materials

Bing Huang, Nadine O. Symonds, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2020•18 citations

Quantum Machine Learning in Chemistry and Materials

Bing Huang, Nadine O. Symonds, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld

arXiv:1807.04259•Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2018•19 citations

Quantum Machine Learning and Quantum Computing for Chemistry

Alán Aspuru‐Guzik

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 13, 2017•0 citations

Position: The Inevitable Transition to Machine Learning in Quantum Chemistry

Karen Sargsyan, Chao-Ping Hsu

Finding exact solutions to the quantum many-body problem is computationally intractable (QMA-hard). Traditional approximations for electrons in an atom or molecule -- density functional theory and wavefunction methods -- have been indispensable, but their development shows signs of saturation: DFT functionals have proliferated without converging toward the exact functional, and strong correlation remains largely unsolved after decades of effort. This position paper argues that machine learning represents the most promising path forward -- not as a proof of logical necessity, but as a decision-theoretic argument: ML succeeds whether the underlying problems are truly hard or merely lack simple analytical solutions. We reframe recent traditional method development as ``hand-crafted machine learning'' that has exhausted the hypothesis space accessible to human intuition. Significant challenges remain, but these have clear research paths forward, unlike the fundamental barriers facing traditional approaches. ML-based approaches merit strategic priority in quantum chemistry's next phase.

physics.chem-phCross-listedarXiv:2607.18281•Jul 1, 2026•0 citations
Finding exact solutions to the quantum many-body problem is computationally intractable (QMA-hard). Traditional approximations for electrons in an atom or molecule -- density functional theory and wavefunction methods -- have been indispensable, but their development shows signs of saturation: DFT functionals have proliferated without converging toward the exact functional, and strong correlation remains largely unsolved after decades of effort. This position paper argues that machine learning represents the most promising path forward -- not as a proof of logical necessity, but as a decision-theoretic argument: ML succeeds whether the underlying problems are truly hard or merely lack simple analytical solutions. We reframe recent traditional method development as ``hand-crafted machine learning'' that has exhausted the hypothesis space accessible to human intuition. Significant challenges remain, but these have clear research paths forward, unlike the fundamental barriers facing traditional approaches. ML-based approaches merit strategic priority in quantum chemistry's next phase.