Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Geometric link between the Hardy nonlocality condition and the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality

Johannes Seiler, Thomas Strohm, Wolfgang P. Schleich

Published Sep 13, 2022• 4 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality and the Hardy condition are both used to detect nonlocality in quantum systems. The authors establish an equivalence between the two by providing a geometrical interpretation of the relevant optimization problem, and find that the golden ratio shows up in their result.
DOI
10.1103/physreva.106.032211

Related papers

The geometric link between Hardy and Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt

Johannes Seiler, Thomas Strohm, Wolfgang P. Schleich

We show that the Hardy nonlocality condition is equivalent to the violation of the CHSH inequality with additional constraints. We adapt the geometrical optimization of the violation of the CHSH inequality to these additional constraints and show that the Hardy condition is equivalent to optimizing the length difference of two sides in a triangle. Furthermore, we discuss the effects of the different constraints.

arXiv:2205.06606•May 13, 2022•0 citations

Hardy’s test versus the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt test of quantum nonlocality: Fundamental and practical aspects

Daniel Braun, Mahn‐Soo Choi

We compare two different tests of quantum nonlocality, both in theoretical terms and with respect to a possible implementation in a mesoscopic circuit: Hardy's test [L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981 (1992)] and the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) test, the latter including a recently discovered inequality relevant for experiments with three possible outcomes [D. Collins and N. Gisin, J. Phys. A 37, 1775 (2004)]. We clarify the geometry of the correlations defined by Hardy's equations with respect to the polytope of causal correlations, and show that these equations generalize to the CHSH inequality if the slightest imperfections in the setup need to be taken into account. We propose a mesoscopic circuit consisting of two interacting Mach-Zehnder interferometers in a Hall bar system for which both Hardy's test and the CHSH test can be realized with a simple change of gate voltages, and evaluate the robustness of the two tests in the case of fluctuating experimental parameters. The proposed setup is remarkably robust and should work for fluctuations of beam splitter angles or phases up to the order of 1 radian, or single particle loss rates up to about 15%.

arXiv:0808.0052•Physical Review A•Sep 19, 2008•13 citations

A Bell inequality which has a larger signal to noise ratio than Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality and which can be used to test locality more simply than Clauser-Horne inequality

M. Ardehali

A Bell inequality is derived from locality and a supplementary assumption. This inequality requires the measurements of only two detection probabilities and has a larger signal to noise ratio than Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality.

•May 12, 1998•0 citations

A unified view on Hardyʼs paradox and the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt inequality

Laura Mančinska, Stephanie Wehner

Bellʼs inequality fundamentally changed our understanding of quantum mechanics. Bellʼs insight that non-local correlations between quantum systems cannot be explained classically can be verified experimentally, and has numerous applications in modern quantum information. Today, the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality is probably the most well-known Bell inequality and it has given us a wealth of understanding in what differentiates the classical from the quantum world. Yet, there are certainly other means of quantifying 'Bell non-locality without inequalities' such as the famous Hardyʼs paradox. As such, one may wonder whether these are entirely different approaches to non-locality. For this anniversary issue, we unify the perspective of the CHSH inequality and Hardy's paradox into one family of non-local games which include both as special cases. This article is part of a special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical devoted to '50 years of Bell's theorem'.

arXiv:1407.2320•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 9, 2014•12 citations

Chained Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt inequality for Hardy’s ladder test of nonlocality

Jose Luis Cereceda

arXiv:1508.06317•Quantum Information Processing•Dec 23, 2015•2 citations

A Bell inequality which can be used to test locality more simply than Clauser-Horne inequality and which is violated by a larger magnitude of violation than Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality

M. Ardehali

A correlation inequality is derived from local realism and a supplementary assumption. Unlike Clauser-Horne (CH) inequality [or Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality] which is violated by quantum mechanics by a factor of $\sqrt 2$, this inequality is violated by a factor of 1.5. Thus the magnitude of violation of this inequality is approximately 20.7% larger than the magnitude of violation of previous inequalities. Moreover, unlike CH (or CHSH) inequality which requires the measurement of five detection probabilities, the present inequality requires the measurement of only two detection probabilities. This inequality can therefore be used to test locality more simply than CH or CHSH inequality.

arXiv:quant-ph/9709043•Sep 19, 1997•0 citations
We compare two different tests of quantum nonlocality, both in theoretical terms and with respect to a possible implementation in a mesoscopic circuit: Hardy's test [L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981 (1992)] and the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) test, the latter including a recently discovered inequality relevant for experiments with three possible outcomes [D. Collins and N. Gisin, J. Phys. A 37, 1775 (2004)]. We clarify the geometry of the correlations defined by Hardy's equations with respect to the polytope of causal correlations, and show that these equations generalize to the CHSH inequality if the slightest imperfections in the setup need to be taken into account. We propose a mesoscopic circuit consisting of two interacting Mach-Zehnder interferometers in a Hall bar system for which both Hardy's test and the CHSH test can be realized with a simple change of gate voltages, and evaluate the robustness of the two tests in the case of fluctuating experimental parameters. The proposed setup is remarkably robust and should work for fluctuations of beam splitter angles or phases up to the order of 1 radian, or single particle loss rates up to about 15%.
Bellʼs inequality fundamentally changed our understanding of quantum mechanics. Bellʼs insight that non-local correlations between quantum systems cannot be explained classically can be verified experimentally, and has numerous applications in modern quantum information. Today, the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality is probably the most well-known Bell inequality and it has given us a wealth of understanding in what differentiates the classical from the quantum world. Yet, there are certainly other means of quantifying 'Bell non-locality without inequalities' such as the famous Hardyʼs paradox. As such, one may wonder whether these are entirely different approaches to non-locality. For this anniversary issue, we unify the perspective of the CHSH inequality and Hardy's paradox into one family of non-local games which include both as special cases. This article is part of a special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical devoted to '50 years of Bell's theorem'.
A correlation inequality is derived from local realism and a supplementary assumption. Unlike Clauser-Horne (CH) inequality [or Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality] which is violated by quantum mechanics by a factor of 2\sqrt 22​, this inequality is violated by a factor of 1.5. Thus the magnitude of violation of this inequality is approximately 20.7% larger than the magnitude of violation of previous inequalities. Moreover, unlike CH (or CHSH) inequality which requires the measurement of five detection probabilities, the present inequality requires the measurement of only two detection probabilities. This inequality can therefore be used to test locality more simply than CH or CHSH inequality.