Leveraging randomized compiling for the quantum imaginary-time-evolution algorithm
Jean-Loup Ville, Alexis Morvan, Akel Hashim, Ravi Naik, Marie Lu, Bradley Mitchell, John Mark Kreikebaum, Kevin P. O’Brien, Joel J. Wallman, Ian Hincks, Joseph Emerson, Ethan Smith, Ed Younis, Costin Iancu, David Santiago, Irfan A. Siddiqi
Recent progress in noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware shows that quantum devices may be able to tackle complex problems even without error correction. However, coherent errors due to the increased complexity of these devices is an outstanding issue. They can accumulate through a circuit, making their impact on algorithms hard to predict and mitigate. Iterative algorithms like quantum imaginary time evolution are susceptible to these errors. This article presents the combination of both noise tailoring using randomized compiling and error mitigation with purification. We also show that cycle benchmarking gives an estimate of the reliability of the purification. We apply this method to the quantum imaginary time evolution of a transverse field Ising model and report an energy estimation error and a ground-state infidelity both below 1%. Our methodology is general and can be used for other algorithms and platforms. We show how combining noise tailoring and error mitigation will push forward the performance of NISQ devices.
Recent progress in noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware shows that quantum devices may be able to tackle complex problems even without error correction. However, coherent errors due to the increased complexity of these devices is an outstanding issue. They can accumulate through a circuit, making their impact on algorithms hard to predict and mitigate. Iterative algorithms like quantum imaginary time evolution are susceptible to these errors. This article presents the combination of both noise tailoring using randomized compiling and error mitigation with purification. We also show that cycle benchmarking gives an estimate of the reliability of the purification. We apply this method to the quantum imaginary time evolution of a transverse field Ising model and report an energy estimation error and a ground-state infidelity both below 1%. Our methodology is general and can be used for other algorithms and platforms. We show how combining noise tailoring and error mitigation will push forward the performance of NISQ devices.
The success of the current generation of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware shows that quantum hardware may be able to tackle complex problems even without error correction. One outstanding issue is that of coherent errors arising from the increased complexity of these devices. These errors can accumulate through a circuit, making their impact on algorithms hard to predict and mitigate. Iterative algorithms like Quantum Imaginary Time Evolution are susceptible to these errors. This article presents the combination of both noise tailoring using Randomized Compiling and error mitigation with a purification. We also show that Cycle Benchmarking gives an estimate of the reliability of the purification. We apply this method to the Quantum Imaginary Time Evolution of a Transverse Field Ising Model and report an energy estimation and a ground state infidelity both below 1\%. Our methodology is general and can be used for other algorithms and platforms. We show how combining noise tailoring and error mitigation will push forward the performance of NISQ devices.
The successful implementation of algorithms on quantum processors relies on the accurate control of quantum bits (qubits) to perform logic gate operations. In this era of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing, systematic miscalibrations, drift, and crosstalk in the control of qubits can lead to a coherent form of error that has no classical analog. Coherent errors severely limit the performance of quantum algorithms in an unpredictable manner, and mitigating their impact is necessary for realizing reliable quantum computations. Moreover, the average error rates measured by randomized benchmarking and related protocols are not sensitive to the full impact of coherent errors and therefore do not reliably predict the global performance of quantum algorithms, leaving us unprepared to validate the accuracy of future large-scale quantum computations. Randomized compiling is a protocol designed to overcome these performance limitations by converting coherent errors into stochastic noise, dramatically reducing unpredictable errors in quantum algorithms and enabling accurate predictions of algorithmic performance from error rates measured via cycle benchmarking. In this work, we demonstrate significant performance gains under randomized compiling for the four-qubit quantum Fourier transform algorithm and for random circuits of variable depth on a superconducting quantum processor. Additionally, we accurately predict algorithm performance using experimentally measured error rates. Our results demonstrate that randomized compiling can be utilized to leverage and predict the capabilities of modern-day noisy quantum processors, paving the way forward for scalable quantum computing.
Abstract Quantum noise limits the reliability of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. Quantum error mitigation (QEM) provides a near-term path to improved accuracy, with randomized compiling (RC) serving as a key technique for transforming arbitrary gate noise into a stochastic Pauli form. However, its sampling complexity grows exponentially with circuit depth, hindering practical use. We introduce twirling scheduling (TS), which groups gate cycles into configurable units twirled collectively. By incorporating pseudo-twirling for non-Clifford gates, TS reduces the sampling-space dimension, mitigating this exponential scaling. Our theoretical analysis provides rigorous error bounds. Numerical simulations on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm circuits up to 50 layers show that TS reduces estimation error by approximately 62% compared to conventional RC under a very small sampling budget and maintains superior performance when combined with established QEM protocols, including zero-noise extrapolation, Clifford data regression, and virtual distillation. TS thus offers a scalable, practical advance for error-mitigated quantum computation on NISQ hardware.
Abstract Accurately characterizing and mitigating the impact of noise is essential for improving the fidelity of quantum simulations on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. In this work, we introduce a circuit-structure-preserving error-mitigation framework designed for parameterized quantum circuits. Unlike conventional approaches that alter circuit topology or require heavy post-processing, our method preserves the native architecture while systematically diagnosing gate noise. This structure-preserving feature enables robust, high-fidelity simulations even in the presence of significant hardware noise, making the approach particularly effective for small-scale circuits executed at high sampling rates, such as those used in variational algorithms and quantum neural networks. To benchmark its performance, we apply the method to variational quantum simulations of a non-Hermitian ferromagnetic transverse-field Ising chain implemented on IBM Quantum processors. The mitigated results exhibit excellent agreement with exact theoretical predictions across a wide range of noise conditions. Thus, our framework provides a scalable and hardware-efficient strategy for the current hardware.
Error mitigation (EM) methods are crucial for obtaining reliable results in the realm of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers, where noise significantly impacts output accuracy. Some EM protocols are particularly efficient for specific types of noise. Yet the noise in the actual hardware may not align with that. In this article, we introduce Noise Tailoring (NT) -- an innovative strategy designed to modify the structure of the noise associated with two-qubit gates through statistical sampling. We perform classical emulation of the protocol behavior and find that the NT+EM results can be up to 5 times more accurate than the results of EM alone for realistic Pauli noise acting on two-qubit gates. At the same time, on actual IBM quantum computers, the NT method falls victim to various small error sources beyond Markovian Pauli noise. We propose to use the NT method for characterizing such error sources on quantum computers in order to inform hardware development.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is widely regarded as a promising near-term quantum algorithm for addressing hard combinatorial optimization problems on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices; however, its real-world effectiveness is severely constrained by hardware noise, including gate infidelities, decoherence, and measurement errors. This work explores an error mitigation–driven approach to enhance the performance and robustness of QAOA without altering its algorithmic structure or requiring fault-tolerant quantum resources. Measurement error mitigation and zero-noise extrapolation are incorporated into the execution and post-processing stages of QAOA circuits and evaluated using the Minimum Vertex Cover problem as a representative benchmark. Performance is assessed through approximation ratios, solution stability, and noise sensitivity across multiple circuit depths. The results indicate that error mitigation not only improves approximation accuracy but also stabilizes output distributions and delays performance degradation at increased circuit depths. Additionally, the mitigated executions demonstrate better consistency across repeated runs, highlighting improved resilience to stochastic noise. These findings emphasize that lightweight and hardware-efficient error mitigation techniques can significantly extend the practical usability of QAOA on current NISQ hardware, providing a scalable and realistic pathway for executing quantum optimization algorithms more reliably in near-term quantum computing environments.