Journal of Mathematical Cryptology

Abelian sharing, common informations, and linear rank inequalities

Carolina Mejía, J. Andrés Montoya

Published Jan 1, 2022• 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Dougherty et al. introduced the common information (CI) method as a method to produce non-Shannon inequalities satisfied by linear random variables, which are called linear rank inequalities. This method is based on the fact that linear random variables have CI. Dougerthy et al. asked whether this method is complete, in the sense that it can be used to produce all linear rank inequalities. We study this question, and we attack it using the theory of secret sharing schemes. To this end, we introduce the notions of Abelian secret sharing scheme and Abelian capacity. We prove that: If there exists an access structure whose Abelian capacity is smaller than its linear capacity, then the CI method is not complete. We investigate the existence of such an access structure.

DOI: 10.1515/jmc-2022-0020

Related papers

Secret Sharing and Non-Shannon Information Inequalities

Amos Beimel, Ilan Orlov

The known secret-sharing schemes for most access structures are not efficient; even for a one-bit secret the length of the shares in the schemes is 2O(n), wherenis the number of participants in the access structure. It is a long standing open problem to improve these schemes or prove that they cannot be improved. The best known lower bound is by Csirmaz, who proved that there exist access structures withnparticipants such that the size of the share of at least one party isn/logntimes the secret size. Csirmaz's proof uses Shannon information inequalities, which were the only information inequalities known when Csirmaz published his result. On the negative side, Csirmaz proved that by only using Shannon information inequalities one cannot prove a lower bound of ω(n) on the share size. In the last decade, a sequence of non-Shannon information inequalities were discovered. In fact, it was proved that there are infinity many independent information inequalities even in four variables. This raises the hope that these inequalities can help in improving the lower bounds beyondn. However, we show that any information inequality with four or five variables cannot prove a lower bound of ω(n) on the share size. In addition, we show that the same negative result holds for all information inequalities with more than five variables that are known to date.

IEEE Transactions on Information TheorySep 1, 201130 citations

Secret Sharing, Rank Inequalities, and Information Inequalities

Sebastià Martı́n, Carles Padró, Yang An

Beimel and Orlov proved that all information inequalities on four or five variables, together with all information inequalities on more than five variables that are known to date, provide lower bounds on the size of the shares in secret sharing schemes that are at most linear on the number of participants. We present here another two negative results about the power of information inequalities in the search for lower bounds in secret sharing. First, we prove that all information inequalities on a bounded number of variables can only provide lower bounds that are polynomial on the number of participants. Second, we prove that the rank inequalities that are derived from the existence of two common informations can provide only lower bounds that are at most cubic in the number of participants.

IEEE Transactions on Information TheoryNov 12, 201516 citations

Symmetries in Linear Programming for Information Inequalities

Emirhan Gürpınar

Secret sharing is a central topic in information-theoretical cryptography. In a secret sharing scheme a random secret is distributed among participants so that only the qualified subsets of parties can recover the secret. In this paper we improve previously known [13] lower bounds on the size of the largest share for several specific access structures. Our approach is based on non-Shannon-type information inequalities. We employ the linear programming (LP) technique that permits to apply new information inequalities indirectly. To reduce computational complexity of the involved linear programs we extensively use symmetry considerations.

arXiv:2201.11656IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)Jun 26, 20221 citation

Secret sharing and duality

László Csirmaz

Abstract Secret sharing is an important building block in cryptography. All explicit secret sharing schemes which are known to have optimal complexity are multi-linear, thus are closely related to linear codes. The dual of such a linear scheme, in the sense of duality of linear codes, gives another scheme for the dual access structure. These schemes have the same complexity, namely the largest share size relative to the secret size is the same. It is a long-standing open problem whether this fact is true in general: the complexity of any access structure is the same as the complexity of its dual. We give a partial answer to this question. An almost perfect scheme allows negligible errors, both in the recovery and in the independence. There exists an almost perfect ideal scheme on 174 participants whose complexity is strictly smaller than that of its dual.

arXiv:1909.13663Journal of Mathematical CryptologyNov 25, 20201 citation

Finding Lower Bounds on the Complexity of Secret Sharing Schemes by Linear Programming.

Carles Padró, Leonor Vázquez, Yang An

Optimizing the maximum, or average, length of the shares in relation to the length of the secret for every given access structure is a difficult and long-standing open problem in cryptology. Most of the known lower bounds on these parameters have been obtained by implicitly or explicitly using that every secret sharing scheme defines a polymatroid related to the access structure. The best bounds that can be obtained by this combinatorial method can be determined by using linear programming, and this can be effectively done for access structures on a small number of participants. By applying this linear programming approach, we improve some of the known lower bounds for the access structures on five participants and the graph access structures on six participants for which these parameters were still undetermined. Nevertheless, the lower bounds that are obtained by this combinatorial method are not tight in general. For some access structures, they can be improved by adding to the linear program non-Shannon information inequalities as new constraints. We obtain in this way new separation results for some graph access structures on eight participants and for some ports of non-representable matroids. Finally, we prove that, for two access structures on five participants, the combinatorial lower bound cannot be attained by any linear secret sharing scheme.

Jan 1, 20120 citations

Secret sharing and duality

László Csirmaz

Secret sharing is an important building block in cryptography. All explicit secret sharing schemes which are known to have optimal complexity are multi-linear, thus are closely related to linear codes. The dual of such a linear scheme, in the sense of duality of linear codes, gives another scheme for the dual access structure. These schemes have the same complexity, namely the largest share size relative to the secret size is the same. It is a long-standing open problem whether this fact is true in general: the complexity of any access structure is the same as the complexity of its dual. We give a partial answer to this question. An almost perfect scheme allows negligible errors, both in the recovery and in the independence. There exists an almost perfect ideal scheme on 174 participants whose complexity is strictly smaller than that of its dual.

Nov 1, 202012 citations