Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Materials Science and Applications

Chiral Waves and Topological Novel States in Fermi

Subhamoy Singha Roy

Published Jan 1, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This first show was that the spin system, the two nearest neighbour spin in the Entanglement of measuring compliance by the ground conditions are achieved Berry stage to the relation when it is a closed path developed is. It noted the need to share the stage in a kind of geometric phase as explained to go to which any deformations involved is not and it’s the first Stiefel-Whitney class which is to Zz–cohomology value takes. However for polarized fermions we can relate the exchange phase as the celebrated Berry phase as in this case the Zz-cohomology becomes irrelevant and is consistent with the first Chern class which involves curvature. This follows from the depiction of a fermion as a scalar particle attached with a magnetic flux line. As in this framework the measure of entanglement of two nearest neighbor spins in a spin system given by concurrence is found to be associated with the Berry phase acquired by a spin state when it evolves in a closed path we can consider that entanglement is a consequence of Fermi statistics. It has been noted that in terms of quantum field theory, the berry phase is related to the perpetual inconsistency caused by the breaking of the perpetual symmetry. As mentioned earlier the quantization procedure of a fermion in the framework of Nelson’s stochastic quantization procedure introduces an internal variable which appears as a direction vector and gives rise to spin degrees of freedom. It's pointing to is that when a spin- 1 state of two spin 1/2 state is a Entangle system as considered to be that, the most widely covered state longitudinal elements with the matching it.

DOI
10.11648/j.ijmsa.20221102.11

Related papers

The geometric phase and the spin-statistics relation

P. B Andyopadhyay

The exchange phase for two spins is studied here from the point of view of the quantization of a fermion in the framework of Nelson’s stochastic mechanics. This introduces a direction vector attached to a space–time point depicting the spin degrees of freedom. In this formalism, a fermion appears as a scalar particle attached with a magnetic-flux quantum, and a quantum spin can be described in terms of an SU(2) gauge bundle. This helps us to recast the Berry–Robbins formalism where the exchange phase appears as an unfamiliar geometric phase arising out of the ‘exchange rotation’ in a transported spin basis in terms of gauge currents. However, for polarized fermions, the exchange phase is found to be given by the Berry phase.

•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

The geometric phase and the spin-statistics relation

P. Bandyopadhyay

The exchange phase for two spins is studied here from the point of view of the quantization of a fermion in the framework of Nelson’s stochastic mechanics. This introduces a direction vector attached to a space–time point depicting the spin degrees of freedom. In this formalism, a fermion appears as a scalar particle attached with a magnetic-flux quantum, and a quantum spin can be described in terms of an SU(2) gauge bundle. This helps us to recast the Berry–Robbins formalism where the exchange phase appears as an unfamiliar geometric phase arising out of the ‘exchange rotation’ in a transported spin basis in terms of gauge currents. However, for polarized fermions, the exchange phase is found to be given by the Berry phase.

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•May 5, 2010•16 citations

Spin Entanglement of Two delocalised Fermions and Berry Phase

Banasri Basu, Bandyopadhyay, P.

We have studied the entanglement of identical fermions in two spatial regions in terms of the Berry phase acquired by their spins. The analysis is done from the viewpoint of the geometrical interpretation of entanglement, where a fermion is visualized as a scalar particle attached with a magnetic flux quantum. The quantification of spin entanglement in terms of their Berry phases is novel and generalises the relationship between the entanglement of distinguishable spins and that of delocalised fermions.

arXiv:0712.4108•Dec 26, 2007•1 citation

Spin entanglement of two delocalized Fermions and Berry phase

Banasri Basu, P. Bandyopadhyay

We have studied the entanglement of identical fermions in two spatial regions in terms of the Berry phase acquired by their spins. The analysis is done from the viewpoint of the geometrical interpretation of entanglement, where a fermion is visualized as a scalar particle attached to a magnetic flux quantum. The quantification of spin entanglement in terms of their Berry phases is novel and generalizes the relationship between the entanglement of distinguishable spins and that of delocalized fermions.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jan 23, 2008•14 citations

Qubit rotation and Berry Phase

Banerjee, Dhruba, Bandyopadhyay, P

A quantized fermion can be represented by a scalar particle encircling a magnetic flux line. It has the spinor structure which can be constructed from quantum gates and qubits. We have studied here the role of Berry phase in removing dynamical phase during one qubit rotation of a quantized fermion. The entanglement of two qubit inserting spin-echo to one of them results the change of Berry phase that can be considered as a measure of entanglement. Some effort is given to study the effect of noise on the Berry phase of spinor and their entangled states.

•Nov 9, 2005•3 citations

The Pancharatnam-Berry Phase: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects

Francisco De

In 1984 Berry addressed a quantum system undergoing a unitary and cyclic evolution under the action of a time-dependent Hamiltonian (M. V. Berry, 1984). The process was supposed to be adiabatic, meaning that the time scale of the system’s evolution was much shorter than the time scale of the changing Hamiltonian. Until Berry’s study, it was assumed that for a cyclic Hamiltonian the quantum state would acquire only so-called dynamical phases, deprived of physical meaning. Such phases could be eliminated by redefining the quantum state through a “gauge” transformation of the form |ψ〉 → eiα |ψ〉. However, Berry discovered that besides the dynamical, there was an additional phase that could not be “gauged away” and whose origin was geometric or topological. It depended on the path that |ψ〉 describes in the parameter space spanned by those parameters to which the Hamiltonian owed its time dependence. Berry’s discovery was the starting point for a great amount of investigations that brought to light topological aspects of both quantum and classical systems. Berry’s phase was soon recognized as a special case of more general phases that showed up when dealing with topological aspects of different systems. For example, the Aharonov-Bohm phase could be understood as a geometric phase. The rotation angle acquired by a parallel-transported vector after completing a closed loop in a gravitationally curved space-time region, is also a geometric, Berry-like phase. Another example is the precession of the plane of oscillation of a Foucault pendulum. Berry’s original formulation was directly applicable to the case of a spin-1/2 system evolving under the action of a slowly varying magnetic field that undergoes cyclic changes. A spin-1/2 system is a special case of a two-level system. Another instances are two-level atoms and polarized light, so that also in these cases we should expect to find geometric phases. In fact, the first experimental test of Berry’s phase was done using polarized, classical light (A. Tomita, 1986). Pancharatnam (S. Pancharatnam, 1956) anticipated Berry’s phase when he proposed, back in 1956, how to decide whether two polarization states are “in phase”. Pancharatnam’s prescription is an operational one, based upon observing whether the intensity of the interferogram formed by two polarized beams has maximal intensity. In that case, the two polarized beams are said to be “in phase”. Such a definition is analogous to the definition of distant parallelism in differential geometry. Polarized states can be subjected to different transformations which could be cyclic or not, adiabatic or not, unitary or not. The Pancharatnam-Berry Phase: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects

InTech eBooks•Feb 24, 2012•16 citations
This first show was that the spin system, the two nearest neighbour spin in the Entanglement of measuring compliance by the ground conditions are achieved Berry stage to the relation when it is a closed path developed is. It noted the need to share the stage in a kind of geometric phase as explained to go to which any deformations involved is not and it’s the first Stiefel-Whitney class which is to Zz–cohomology value takes. However for polarized fermions we can relate the exchange phase as the celebrated Berry phase as in this case the Zz-cohomology becomes irrelevant and is consistent with the first Chern class which involves curvature. This follows from the depiction of a fermion as a scalar particle attached with a magnetic flux line. As in this framework the measure of entanglement of two nearest neighbor spins in a spin system given by concurrence is found to be associated with the Berry phase acquired by a spin state when it evolves in a closed path we can consider that entanglement is a consequence of Fermi statistics. It has been noted that in terms of quantum field theory, the berry phase is related to the perpetual inconsistency caused by the breaking of the perpetual symmetry. As mentioned earlier the quantization procedure of a fermion in the framework of Nelson’s stochastic quantization procedure introduces an internal variable which appears as a direction vector and gives rise to spin degrees of freedom. It's pointing to is that when a spin- 1 state of two spin 1/2 state is a Entangle system as considered to be that, the most widely covered state longitudinal elements with the matching it.
The exchange phase for two spins is studied here from the point of view of the quantization of a fermion in the framework of Nelson’s stochastic mechanics. This introduces a direction vector attached to a space–time point depicting the spin degrees of freedom. In this formalism, a fermion appears as a scalar particle attached with a magnetic-flux quantum, and a quantum spin can be described in terms of an SU(2) gauge bundle. This helps us to recast the Berry–Robbins formalism where the exchange phase appears as an unfamiliar geometric phase arising out of the ‘exchange rotation’ in a transported spin basis in terms of gauge currents. However, for polarized fermions, the exchange phase is found to be given by the Berry phase.
The exchange phase for two spins is studied here from the point of view of the quantization of a fermion in the framework of Nelson’s stochastic mechanics. This introduces a direction vector attached to a space–time point depicting the spin degrees of freedom. In this formalism, a fermion appears as a scalar particle attached with a magnetic-flux quantum, and a quantum spin can be described in terms of an SU(2) gauge bundle. This helps us to recast the Berry–Robbins formalism where the exchange phase appears as an unfamiliar geometric phase arising out of the ‘exchange rotation’ in a transported spin basis in terms of gauge currents. However, for polarized fermions, the exchange phase is found to be given by the Berry phase.
We have studied the entanglement of identical fermions in two spatial regions in terms of the Berry phase acquired by their spins. The analysis is done from the viewpoint of the geometrical interpretation of entanglement, where a fermion is visualized as a scalar particle attached with a magnetic flux quantum. The quantification of spin entanglement in terms of their Berry phases is novel and generalises the relationship between the entanglement of distinguishable spins and that of delocalised fermions.
We have studied the entanglement of identical fermions in two spatial regions in terms of the Berry phase acquired by their spins. The analysis is done from the viewpoint of the geometrical interpretation of entanglement, where a fermion is visualized as a scalar particle attached to a magnetic flux quantum. The quantification of spin entanglement in terms of their Berry phases is novel and generalizes the relationship between the entanglement of distinguishable spins and that of delocalized fermions.
A quantized fermion can be represented by a scalar particle encircling a magnetic flux line. It has the spinor structure which can be constructed from quantum gates and qubits. We have studied here the role of Berry phase in removing dynamical phase during one qubit rotation of a quantized fermion. The entanglement of two qubit inserting spin-echo to one of them results the change of Berry phase that can be considered as a measure of entanglement. Some effort is given to study the effect of noise on the Berry phase of spinor and their entangled states.
In 1984 Berry addressed a quantum system undergoing a unitary and cyclic evolution under the action of a time-dependent Hamiltonian (M. V. Berry, 1984). The process was supposed to be adiabatic, meaning that the time scale of the system’s evolution was much shorter than the time scale of the changing Hamiltonian. Until Berry’s study, it was assumed that for a cyclic Hamiltonian the quantum state would acquire only so-called dynamical phases, deprived of physical meaning. Such phases could be eliminated by redefining the quantum state through a “gauge” transformation of the form |ψ〉 → eiα |ψ〉. However, Berry discovered that besides the dynamical, there was an additional phase that could not be “gauged away” and whose origin was geometric or topological. It depended on the path that |ψ〉 describes in the parameter space spanned by those parameters to which the Hamiltonian owed its time dependence. Berry’s discovery was the starting point for a great amount of investigations that brought to light topological aspects of both quantum and classical systems. Berry’s phase was soon recognized as a special case of more general phases that showed up when dealing with topological aspects of different systems. For example, the Aharonov-Bohm phase could be understood as a geometric phase. The rotation angle acquired by a parallel-transported vector after completing a closed loop in a gravitationally curved space-time region, is also a geometric, Berry-like phase. Another example is the precession of the plane of oscillation of a Foucault pendulum. Berry’s original formulation was directly applicable to the case of a spin-1/2 system evolving under the action of a slowly varying magnetic field that undergoes cyclic changes. A spin-1/2 system is a special case of a two-level system. Another instances are two-level atoms and polarized light, so that also in these cases we should expect to find geometric phases. In fact, the first experimental test of Berry’s phase was done using polarized, classical light (A. Tomita, 1986). Pancharatnam (S. Pancharatnam, 1956) anticipated Berry’s phase when he proposed, back in 1956, how to decide whether two polarization states are “in phase”. Pancharatnam’s prescription is an operational one, based upon observing whether the intensity of the interferogram formed by two polarized beams has maximal intensity. In that case, the two polarized beams are said to be “in phase”. Such a definition is analogous to the definition of distant parallelism in differential geometry. Polarized states can be subjected to different transformations which could be cyclic or not, adiabatic or not, unitary or not. The Pancharatnam-Berry Phase: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects