In 2019, Yonghae Lee et al. combined the circuit implementation of the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm with a classical computer, and designed a hybrid HHL algorithm to reduce experimental errors caused by decoherence and so on. However, the improvement is achieved only in the auxiliary quantum coding phase, and no quantum resource reduction is done on the quantum phase estimation and inverse quantum phase estimation stages. At the same time, the circuit improvement illustration on a [Formula: see text] linear system just has the result and no specific process. In this paper, based on the idea of the hybrid HHL algorithm and a generic circuit of HHL algorithm, an improved circuit implementation of the HHL algorithm is proposed. The feasibility of the improved circuit implementation of the HHL algorithm is verified by IBM's qiskit. The improved circuit illustrations on a [Formula: see text] linear system show that the improved circuit implementation of the HHL algorithm can effectively reduce quantum resources without losing the fidelity of the results. Thus the improved circuit implementation of the HHL algorithm can further avoid some result errors than the existing implementation methods.
In 2019, Yonghae Lee et al. combined the circuit implementation of the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm with a classical computer, and designed a hybrid HHL algorithm to reduce experimental errors caused by decoherence and so on. However, the improvement is achieved only in the auxiliary quantum coding phase, and no quantum resource reduction is done on the quantum phase estimation and inverse quantum phase estimation stages. At the same time, the circuit improvement illustration on a [Formula: see text] linear system just has the result and no specific process. In this paper, based on the idea of the hybrid HHL algorithm and a generic circuit of HHL algorithm, an improved circuit implementation of the HHL algorithm is proposed. The feasibility of the improved circuit implementation of the HHL algorithm is verified by IBM's qiskit. The improved circuit illustrations on a [Formula: see text] linear system show that the improved circuit implementation of the HHL algorithm can effectively reduce quantum resources without losing the fidelity of the results. Thus the improved circuit implementation of the HHL algorithm can further avoid some result errors than the existing implementation methods.
Abstract In 2019, Yonghae Lee et al. combined the circuit implementation of the HHL quantum algorithm with a classical computer, and designed a hybrid HHL quantum circuit optimization algorithm to reduce experimental errors caused by decoherence and so on. However, the optimization is achieved only in the auxiliary quantum coding phase, and no quantum resource reduction is done on the quantum phase estimation and inverse quantum phase estimation stages. At the same time, the circuit optimization illustration on the 2th-order linear equation system just has the result and no specific process. In this paper, based on the idea of the hybrid HHL algorithm and the general quantum circuit implementation framework of HHL, a global optimization HHL algorithm is proposed. The feasibility of the global optimization HHL algorithm is verified by IBM's qiskit. The detail circuit optimization illustrations on the 4th-order linear equations show that the global optimization HHL algorithm can effectively reduce quantum resources without losing the fidelity of the results. Thus the global optimization HHL algorithm can further avoid some result errors than the existing implementation methods.
We propose a hybrid quantum algorithm based on the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm for solving a system of linear equations. In this paper, we show that our hybrid algorithm can reduce a circuit depth from the original HHL algorithm by means of a classical information feed-forward after the quantum phase estimation algorithm, and the results of the hybrid algorithm are identical to those of the HHL algorithm. In addition, it is experimentally examined with four qubits in the IBM Quantum Experience setups, and the experimental results of our algorithm show higher accurate performance on specific systems of linear equations than that of the HHL algorithm.
We present a classical enhancement to improve the accuracy of the Hybrid variant (Hybrid HHL) of the quantum algorithm for solving linear systems of equations proposed by Harrow, Hassidim, and Lloyd (HHL). We achieve this by using higher precision quantum estimates of the eigenvalues relevant to the linear system, and a new classical step to guide the eigenvalue inversion part of Hybrid HHL. We show that eigenvalue estimates with just two extra bits of precision result in tighter error bounds for our Enhanced Hybrid HHL compared to HHL. Our enhancement reduces the error of Hybrid HHL by an average of 57 percent on an ideal quantum processor for a representative sample of 2x2 systems. On IBM Torino and IonQ Aria-1 hardware, we see that the error of Enhanced Hybrid HHL is on average 13 percent and 20 percent (respectively) less than that of HHL for the same set of systems.
After learning basic quantum computing concepts, it is desirable to reinforce the learning using an important and relatively complex algorithm through which students can observe and appreciate how qubits evolve and interact with each other. Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) quantum algorithm, which can solve linear system problems with exponential speed-up over the classical method and is the basis of many important quantum computing algorithms, is used to serve this purpose. The HHL algorithm is explained analytically followed by a 4-qubit numerical example in bra-ket notation. Matlab code corresponding to the numerical example is available for students to gain a deeper understanding of the HHL algorithm from a pure matrix point of view. A quantum circuit programmed using qiskit is also provided for real hardware execution in IBM quantum computers. After going through the material, students are expected to have a better appreciation of the concepts such as basis transformation, bra-ket and matrix representations, superposition, entanglement, controlled operations, measurement, quantum Fourier transformation, quantum phase estimation, and quantum programming. To help readers review these basic concepts, brief explanations augmented by the HHL numerical examples in the main text are provided in the Appendix.
In this paper, we study the error propagation and generation in the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) quantum algorithm runs on IBM-Q hardware with the help of a MATLAB simulator. HHL is a quantum algorithm that can provide exponential speedup over the fastest classical algorithm (conjugate gradient method) in solving systems of linear equations (SLE). However, without error correction, it cannot give correct results even in a 2-variable system due to its complexity. In this study, an HHL quantum circuit for a 2-variable SLE is implemented in IBM-Q and the error is extracted after each stage of the circuit and compared to a MATLAB simulator. We identified three major sources of errors, namely single-qubit flipping, gate infidelity, and error propagation. We also found that at the ancillary bit rotation stage, the error becomes large but the encoded solution still has high fidelity. However, the solution is mostly lost after the inverse quantum phase estimation which is necessary to extract the solution efficiently. Therefore, it is suggested that error correction resources, if limited, should be added to the second half of the circuit.
We propose a hybrid quantum-classical implementation of the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm for the matrix inversion (linear-systems) problem, a key subroutine in quantum computing. Rather than claiming a new complexity result, we provide an assumption-explicit proof sketch, aligned with established literature, that contextualizes matrix inversion as Bounded-Error Quantum Polynomial Time (BQP)-complete and offers reduction-based intuition via Grover-type amplitude amplification. We implement HHL for 2 × 2, 4 × 4, and 8 × 8 Hermitian matrices using Qiskit and evaluate performance using simulator-based experiments with calibrated noise models and executions on IBM Quantum and IonQ backends. To enhance robustness on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware, we integrate measurement-error mitigation, zero-noise extrapolation, and post-selection, and we quantify performance using fidelity and mean squared error. Results from noiseless simulation, calibrated-noise simulation, and real-device execution show that mitigation improves reconstruction fidelity for small Hermitian systems, particularly for deeper circuits. These findings support mitigation-aware feasibility on current NISQ devices; however, they do not establish present-day runtime advantage over optimized classical solvers. The proposed workflow is relevant to quantum optimization, quantum machine learning, and quantum chemistry, where linear-system primitives arise frequently. Future work will focus on reducing phase-estimation depth (e.g., iterative or semiclassical variants), improving compilation and benchmarking transparency, and re-evaluating larger instances on higher-fidelity hardware.