Quantum simulation is the foundation for the design of many algorithms which share subroutines known as quantum simulation kernels. Optimizing the compilation of these kernels is crucial, involving two key components: 1) circuit synthesis and 2) qubit mapping. However, existing circuit synthesis methods either overlook qubit connectivity constraints (QCCs) or prioritize minimizing gate count over optimizing circuit depth. Similarly, current qubit mapping techniques do not work well with circuit synthesis methods. To address these limitations, we propose PauliForest, which comprises a connectivity-aware circuit synthesis algorithm and a Pauli-oriented qubit mapping algorithm. The synthesis algorithm employs heuristic strategies to generate shallower circuits, while the qubit mapping algorithm seamlessly collaborates with the circuit synthesis process. Compared to the state-of-the-art Paulihedral compiler, our approach significantly reduces both CNOT gate counts (by 13%) and circuit depths (by 25%). Experiments on a noisy simulator and a real superconducting quantum computer show that our algorithm can improve the fidelity of quantum circuit execution compared to Paulihedral.Quantum simulation is the foundation for the design of many algorithms which share subroutines known as quantum simulation kernels. Optimizing the compilation of these kernels is crucial, involving two key components: 1) circuit synthesis and 2) qubit mapping. However, existing circuit synthesis methods either overlook qubit connectivity constraints (QCCs) or prioritize minimizing gate count over optimizing circuit depth. Similarly, current qubit mapping techniques do not work well with circuit synthesis methods. To address these limitations, we propose PauliForest, which comprises a connectivity-aware circuit synthesis algorithm and a Pauli-oriented qubit mapping algorithm. The synthesis algorithm employs heuristic strategies to generate shallower circuits, while the qubit mapping algorithm seamlessly collaborates with the circuit synthesis process. Compared to the state-of-the-art Paulihedral compiler, our approach significantly reduces both CNOT gate counts (by 13%) and circuit depths (by 25%). Experiments on a noisy simulator and a real superconducting quantum computer show that our algorithm can improve the fidelity of quantum circuit execution compared to Paulihedral.

IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and SystemsDec 2, 20241 citation

Circuit Synthesis and Resource Optimization

Daniele Cuomo

Springer thesesJan 1, 20240 citations

Reconfigurable circuits

Noriaki Horiuchi

Nature PhotonicsJan 29, 20160 citations

Generalizing Reinforcement Learning-Based Quantum Circuit Synthesis across Multiple Topologies

Giovanni Acampora, Allegra Cuzzocrea, Marco Lapegna +2 more

The optimization of the limited resources of current quantum devices hinges on the implementation of quantum-compiling techniques. The process of transforming high-level quantum algorithms into executable quantum circuits has a significant impact on the performance and fidelity of computations. One of the most critical aspects of the compiling stack is the synthesis of quantum circuits, which aims to minimize the depth and number of gates, as well as the error rate. Nevertheless, the optimal synthesis algorithms are extremely computationally expensive. This is why synthesis algorithms based on reinforcement learning (RL) have recently been introduced. However, such algorithms are constrained by the topology of quantum processors, necessitating retraining of the RL agent for different topologies. To achieve a balance between adaptability, optimality, and computational cost in RL-based quantum circuit synthesis techniques, this work proposes an RL-based quantum circuit synthesis algorithm of Clifford operators that addresses different topologies simultaneously. Experimental tests demonstrate that our synthesizer outperforms state-of-the-art greedy techniques while being significantly faster than boolean satisfiability solvers (SAT).The optimization of the limited resources of current quantum devices hinges on the implementation of quantum-compiling techniques. The process of transforming high-level quantum algorithms into executable quantum circuits has a significant impact on the performance and fidelity of computations. One of the most critical aspects of the compiling stack is the synthesis of quantum circuits, which aims to minimize the depth and number of gates, as well as the error rate. Nevertheless, the optimal synthesis algorithms are extremely computationally expensive. This is why synthesis algorithms based on reinforcement learning (RL) have recently been introduced. However, such algorithms are constrained by the topology of quantum processors, necessitating retraining of the RL agent for different topologies. To achieve a balance between adaptability, optimality, and computational cost in RL-based quantum circuit synthesis techniques, this work proposes an RL-based quantum circuit synthesis algorithm of Clifford operators that addresses different topologies simultaneously. Experimental tests demonstrate that our synthesizer outperforms state-of-the-art greedy techniques while being significantly faster than boolean satisfiability solvers (SAT).

Mar 17, 20253 citations

Computational Circuits

Jarosław Adam Miszczak

Synthesis lectures on quantum computingJan 1, 20120 citations

Numerical Circuit Synthesis and Compilation for Multi-State Preparation

Aaron Szasz, Ed Younis, Wibe Albert de Jong

Near-term quantum computers have significant error rates and short coherence times, so compilation of circuits to be as short as possible is essential. Two types of compilation problems are typically considered: circuits to prepare a given state from a fixed input state, called “state preparation”; and circuits to implement a given unitary operation, for example by “unitary synthesis”. In this paper we solve a more general problem: the transformation of a set of m states to another set of $m$ states, which we call “multi-state preparation”. State preparation and unitary synthesis are special cases; for state preparation, m=1, while for unitary synthesis, m is the dimension of the full Hilbert space. We generate and optimize circuits for multi-state preparation numerically. In cases where a top-down approach based on matrix decompositions is also possible, our method finds circuits with substantially (up to 40 %) fewer two-qubit gates. We discuss possible applications, including efficient preparation of macroscopic superposition (“cat”) states and synthesis of quantum channels.Near-term quantum computers have significant error rates and short coherence times, so compilation of circuits to be as short as possible is essential. Two types of compilation problems are typically considered: circuits to prepare a given state from a fixed input state, called “state preparation”; and circuits to implement a given unitary operation, for example by “unitary synthesis”. In this paper we solve a more general problem: the transformation of a set of m states to another set of$m$states, which we call “multi-state preparation”. State preparation and unitary synthesis are special cases; for state preparation, m=1, while for unitary synthesis, m is the dimension of the full Hilbert space. We generate and optimize circuits for multi-state preparation numerically. In cases where a top-down approach based on matrix decompositions is also possible, our method finds circuits with substantially (up to 40 %) fewer two-qubit gates. We discuss possible applications, including efficient preparation of macroscopic superposition (“cat”) states and synthesis of quantum channels.

arXiv:2305.01816IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)Sep 17, 20234 citations

m

states, which we call “multi-state preparation”. State preparation and unitary synthesis are special cases; for state preparation, m=1, while for unitary synthesis, m is the dimension of the full Hilbert space. We generate and optimize circuits for multi-state preparation numerically. In cases where a top-down approach based on matrix decompositions is also possible, our method finds circuits with substantially (up to 40 %) fewer two-qubit gates. We discuss possible applications, including efficient preparation of macroscopic superposition (“cat”) states and synthesis of quantum channels.