Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Covert Authentication from Lattices

Rajendra Kumar, Khoa Nguyen

Published Jan 1, 2022• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-09234-3_24

Related papers

Practical Covert Authentication

Stanisław Jarecki

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2014•10 citations

Covert communications on renewal packet channels

Ramin Soltani, Dennis Goeckel, Don Towsley +1 more

In recent years, the information theory of covert communications, where the very presence of the communication is undetectable to a watchful adversary Willie, has been of great interest. Our recent work introduced the information-theoretic limits for communication by covert users Alice and Bob, over packet channels where the packet timings of legitimate users Jack and Steve are governed by a Poisson point process. Here we consider the extension to timing channels characterized by more general renewal processes of rate λ. We consider two scenarios. In the first scenario, the source of the packets on the channel cannot be authenticated by Willie, and therefore Alice can insert packets into the channel. We show that if the total number of transmitted packets by Jack is N, Alice can covertly insert O(√N)packets and, if she transmits more, she will be detected by Willie. In the second scenario, packets are authenticated by Willie but we assume that Alice and Bob share a secret key; hence, Alice alters the timings of the packets according to a pre-shared codebook with Bob to send information to him over a G/M/1 queue with service rate μ > λ. We show that Alice can covertly and reliably transmit O(N) bits to Bob when the total number of packets sent from Jack to Steve is N.

arXiv:1610.00368•Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing•Sep 1, 2016•15 citations

Proxy Re-encryption from Lattices

Elena Kirshanova

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2014•92 citations

Proxy Re-Encryption and Re-Signatures from Lattices

Xiong Fan, Feng-Hao Liu

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2019•38 citations

Short Concurrent Covert Authenticated Key Exchange (Short cAKE)

Karim Eldefrawy, Nicholas Genise, Stanisław Jarecki

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2023•2 citations

Revisiting Deniability in Quantum Key Exchange via Covert Communication and Entanglement Distillation

Arash Atashpendar, Guru-Vamsi Policharla, Peter Browne Rønne +1 more

We revisit the notion of deniability in quantum key exchange (QKE), a topic that remains largely unexplored. In the only work on this subject by Donald Beaver, it is argued that QKE is not necessarily deniable due to an eavesdropping attack that limits key equivocation. We provide more insight into the nature of this attack and how it extends to other constructions such as QKE obtained from uncloneable encryption. We then adopt the framework for quantum authenticated key exchange, developed by Mosca et al., and extend it to introduce the notion of coercer-deniable QKE, formalized in terms of the indistinguishability of real and fake coercer views. Next, we apply results from a recent work by Arrazola and Scarani on covert quantum communication to establish a connection between covert QKE and deniability. We propose DC-QKE, a simple deniable covert QKE protocol, and prove its deniability via a reduction to the security of covert QKE. Finally, we consider how entanglement distillation can be used to enable information-theoretically deniable protocols for QKE and tasks beyond key exchange.

arXiv:1812.02245•Dec 5, 2018•2 citations
In recent years, the information theory of covert communications, where the very presence of the communication is undetectable to a watchful adversary Willie, has been of great interest. Our recent work introduced the information-theoretic limits for communication by covert users Alice and Bob, over packet channels where the packet timings of legitimate users Jack and Steve are governed by a Poisson point process. Here we consider the extension to timing channels characterized by more general renewal processes of rate λ. We consider two scenarios. In the first scenario, the source of the packets on the channel cannot be authenticated by Willie, and therefore Alice can insert packets into the channel. We show that if the total number of transmitted packets by Jack is N, Alice can covertly insert O(√N)packets and, if she transmits more, she will be detected by Willie. In the second scenario, packets are authenticated by Willie but we assume that Alice and Bob share a secret key; hence, Alice alters the timings of the packets according to a pre-shared codebook with Bob to send information to him over a G/M/1 queue with service rate μ > λ. We show that Alice can covertly and reliably transmit O(N) bits to Bob when the total number of packets sent from Jack to Steve is N.
We revisit the notion of deniability in quantum key exchange (QKE), a topic that remains largely unexplored. In the only work on this subject by Donald Beaver, it is argued that QKE is not necessarily deniable due to an eavesdropping attack that limits key equivocation. We provide more insight into the nature of this attack and how it extends to other constructions such as QKE obtained from uncloneable encryption. We then adopt the framework for quantum authenticated key exchange, developed by Mosca et al., and extend it to introduce the notion of coercer-deniable QKE, formalized in terms of the indistinguishability of real and fake coercer views. Next, we apply results from a recent work by Arrazola and Scarani on covert quantum communication to establish a connection between covert QKE and deniability. We propose DC-QKE, a simple deniable covert QKE protocol, and prove its deniability via a reduction to the security of covert QKE. Finally, we consider how entanglement distillation can be used to enable information-theoretically deniable protocols for QKE and tasks beyond key exchange.