The Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization Problem

Gary A. Kochenberger, Fred Glover, Haibo Wang

Shunsuke Tsukiyama, Xiaotian Li, Koji Nakano +5 more

Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models are defined by quadratic expressions composed of binary variables, each taking a value of either 0 or 1. The objective of the QUBO problem is to find an optimal assignment of these binary variables that minimizes the value of the QUBO model. The QUBO problem has attracted significant research interest due to its versatility in reformulating various NP-complete problems and its potential for efficiently finding heuristic solutions through quantum annealing. This paper focuses on converting Cubic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (CUBO) problems, defined by cubic expressions, into equivalent QUBO models. Through this conversion, CUBO problems can be solved using quantum annealing. Since the important NP-hard problem 3-SAT can be straightforwardly represented as a CUBO problem, investigating the conversion from CUBO to QUBO models is a meaningful endeavor.

Gary A. Kochenberger, Fred Glover, Haibo Wang

Vrinda Mehta, Fengping Jin, Kristel F. L. Michielsen +1 more

We use exact enumeration to characterize the solutions of quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems of less than 21 variables in terms of their distributions of Hamming distances to close-by solutions. We also perform experiments with the D-Wave Advantage 5.1 quantum annealer, solving many instances of up to 170-variable, quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. Our results demonstrate that the exponents characterizing the success probability of a D-Wave annealer to solve a QUBO correlate very well with the predictions based on the Hamming distance distributions computed for small problem instances.

Erich Steiner, Th. M. Liebling, Komei Fukuda +1 more

Grange, Camille, Marion Lavignac, Valentina Pozzoli +1 more

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is one of the most short-term promising quantum-classical algorithm to solve unconstrained combinatorial optimization problems. It alternates between the execution of a parametrized quantum circuit and a classical optimization. There are numerous levers for enhancing QAOA performances, such as the choice of quantum circuit meta-parameters or the choice of the classical optimizer. In this paper, we stress on the importance of the input problem formulation by illustrating it with the resolution of an industrial railway timetabling problem. Specifically, we present a generic method to reformulate any polynomial problem into a Polynomial Unconstrained Binary Optimization (PUBO) problem, with a specific formulation imposing penalty terms to take binary values when the constraints are linear. We also provide a generic reformulation into a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem. We then conduct a numerical comparison between the PUBO with binary penalty terms and the QUBO formulations proposed on a railway timetabling problem solved with QAOA. Our results illustrate that the PUBO reformulation outperforms the QUBO one for the problem at hand.