Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Wireless Information Networks

Multicast Network Security with Asymmetric Cooperative Relaying

Dilip Kumar Sarker, Md. Zahurul I. Sarkar, Md. Shamim Anower, Rezwana Sultana

Published Jun 14, 2022• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10776-022-00566-7

Related papers

Secure wireless multicasting through AF-cooperative networks with best-relay selection over generalized fading channels

Dilip Kumar Sarker, Md. Zahurul I. Sarkar, Md. Shamim Anower

Wireless Networks•Oct 28, 2018•16 citations

Cooperative Relaying Protocol for Improving Physical Layer Security in Wireless Decode-and-Forward Relaying Networks

Jong-Ho Lee

Wireless Personal Communications•Apr 16, 2015•10 citations

Enhancing Security in Correlated Multicasting System with Diversity Combining and Opportunistic Relaying Techniques

Sarjana Shabab, Md. Zahurul Islam

•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Outage Analysis of Cooperative Secrecy Multicast Transmission

Xiaowei Wang, Meixia Tao, Youyun Xu

This work considers a multicast network in the presence of an eavesdropper. We investigate a cooperative multicast scheme which allows the users to function as relays. The secure outage behavior of this scheme is studied and the analytical expression of secure outage probability is derived. Numerical results show that the proposed cooperative multicast scheme outperforms the direct multicast without cooperation in terms of secure outage probability.

IEEE Wireless Communications Letters•Jan 31, 2014•21 citations

Cooperative jamming for energy harvesting multicast networks with an untrusted relay

Bingtao He, Jian Chen, Yonghong Kuo +1 more

Recently, there are increasing requirements of security in wireless communications, especially for the multiuser systems. In this study, the authors consider the security of two‐hop cooperative multicast networks with an untrusted relay. An energy harvesting destination aided cooperative jamming framework is proposed to protect information from being intercepted by the untrusted relay. For the multiple destinations, a maximum interference jammer selection (MIJS) scheme is proposed to further improve physical layer security. Then the ergodic secrecy rate (ESR) for MIJS scheme is investigated and both the lower bound of ESR and the approximation of ESR are obtained. Finally, the effect of both the energy arrival rate and the number of destination nodes on ESR has been shown via numerical simulations. It can be revealed that as the number of destinations increases, the ESR is determined with two common behaviours regarding the multicast nature and energy arrival rate: (i) multicast nature forces the secrecy rate to decrease with the increasing number of destinations and (ii) the probability that a jammer exists increases with the increasing number of destinations but limited to one.

IET Communications•May 11, 2017•12 citations

Physical-Layer Security for Cooperative Relay Networks

Yulong Zou, Jia Rong Zhu

Wireless networks•Jan 1, 2016•19 citations
Recently, there are increasing requirements of security in wireless communications, especially for the multiuser systems. In this study, the authors consider the security of two‐hop cooperative multicast networks with an untrusted relay. An energy harvesting destination aided cooperative jamming framework is proposed to protect information from being intercepted by the untrusted relay. For the multiple destinations, a maximum interference jammer selection (MIJS) scheme is proposed to further improve physical layer security. Then the ergodic secrecy rate (ESR) for MIJS scheme is investigated and both the lower bound of ESR and the approximation of ESR are obtained. Finally, the effect of both the energy arrival rate and the number of destination nodes on ESR has been shown via numerical simulations. It can be revealed that as the number of destinations increases, the ESR is determined with two common behaviours regarding the multicast nature and energy arrival rate: (i) multicast nature forces the secrecy rate to decrease with the increasing number of destinations and (ii) the probability that a jammer exists increases with the increasing number of destinations but limited to one.