Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

AAPPS bulletin

A geometrical framework for quantum incompatibility resources

Xiaolin Zhang, Rui Qu, Zehong Chang, Quan Quan, Hong Xiu Gao, Fuli Li, Pei Zhang

Published Jun 10, 2022• 8 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Quantum incompatibility is a fundamental property in quantum physics and is considered as a resource in quantum information processing tasks. Here, we construct a framework based on the incompatibility witness originated from quantum state discrimination. In this framework, we discuss the geometrical properties of the witnesses with noisy mutually unbiased bases and construct a quantifier of quantum incompatibility associated with geometrical information. Furthermore, we explore the incompatibility of a pair of positive operator valued measurements, which only depends on the information of measurements, and discuss the incompatibility of measurements which can be discriminated by mutually unbiased bases. Finally, if we take a resource-theory perspective, the new-defined quantifier can characterize the resource of incompatibility. This geometrical framework gives the evidence that vectors can be utilized to describe resourceful incompatibility and make a step to explore geometrical features of quantum resources.

DOI
10.1007/s43673-022-00047-2

Related papers

Experimental investigation of measurement incompatibility of mutually unbiased bases

Yu Guo, Shuming Cheng, Xiao‐Min Hu +4 more

Incompatible measurements are of fundamental importance to revealing the peculiar features of quantum theory, and are also useful resources in various quantum information tasks. In this work, we investigate the quantum incompatibility of mutually unbiased bases (MUBs) within the operational framework of quantum resource theory, and report an experimental validation via the task of state discrimination. In particular, we construct an experimentally friendly witness to detect incompatible MUBs, based on the probability of correctly discriminating quantum states. Furthermore, we prove that the noise robustness of MUBs can be retrieved from violating the above witness. Finally, we experimentally test the incompatibility of MUBs of dimensionality ranging from 2 to 4, and demonstrate that it is more robust to noise, as either the dimensionality of measurements or the number of MUBs increases. Our results may aid the exploration of the essential roles of incompatible measurements in both theoretical and practical applications in quantum information.

Chip•Feb 28, 2023•2 citations

Entanglement-free witnessing of quantum incompatibility in a high-dimensional system

Dian Wu, Qi Zhao, Yi-Han Luo +8 more

Quantum incompatibility, as an important quantum resource, is believed to play a key role in quantum information processing tasks.In order to detect this property, an entanglement-free incompatibility witness is proposed via constructing a combined quantum state discrimination task with prior-measurement and postmeasurement information strategies.Here we experimentally implement the witness of the incompatibility of mutually unbiased measurements under different noise levels in a qutrit system.Moreover, we estimate the robustness of incompatibility using collected data.Our work paves the path for understanding quantum incompatibility and exploring the features of the quantum resource.

Physical Review Research•Apr 6, 2021•4 citations

Quantum incompatibility of a physical context

Everlyn Martins, M. F. Savi, R. M. Angelo

Pivotal within quantum physics, the concept of quantum incompatibility is generally related to algebraic aspects of the formalism, such as commutation relations and unbiasedness of bases. Recently, the concept was identified as a resource in tasks involving quantum state discrimination and quantum programmability. Here, we link quantum incompatibility with the amount of information that can be extracted from a system upon successive measurements of noncommuting observables, a scenario related to communication tasks. This approach leads us to characterize incompatibility as a resource encoded in a physical context, which involves both the quantum state and observables. Moreover, starting with a measure of context incompatibility we derive a measurement-incompatibility quantifier that is easily computable, admits a geometrical interpretation, and is maximum only if the eigenbases of the involved observables are mutually unbiased.

arXiv:2004.01008•Physical Review A•Nov 4, 2020•15 citations

Distance-based resource quantification for sets of quantum measurements

Lucas Tendick, Martin Kliesch, Hermann Kampermann +1 more

The advantage that quantum systems provide for certain quantum information processing tasks over their classical counterparts can be quantified within the general framework of resource theories. Certain distance functions between quantum states have successfully been used to quantify resources like entanglement and coherence. Perhaps surprisingly, such a distance-based approach has not been adopted to study resources of quantum measurements, where other geometric quantifiers are used instead. Here, we define distance functions between sets of quantum measurements and show that they naturally induce resource monotones for convex resource theories of measurements. By focusing on a distance based on the diamond norm, we establish a hierarchy of measurement resources and derive analytical bounds on the incompatibility of any set of measurements. We show that these bounds are tight for certain projective measurements based on mutually unbiased bases and identify scenarios where different measurement resources attain the same value when quantified by our resource monotone. Our results provide a general framework to compare distance-based resources for sets of measurements and allow us to obtain limitations on Bell-type experiments.

Quantum•May 15, 2023•7 citations

Distance-based resource quantification for sets of quantum measurements

Lucas Tendick, Martin Kliesch, Hermann Kampermann +1 more

The advantage that quantum systems provide for certain quantum information processing tasks over their classical counterparts can be quantified within the general framework of resource theories. Certain distance functions between quantum states have successfully been used to quantify resources like entanglement and coherence. Perhaps surprisingly, such a distance-based approach has not been adopted to study resources of quantum measurements, where other geometric quantifiers are used instead. Here, we define distance functions between sets of quantum measurements and show that they naturally induce resource monotones for convex resource theories of measurements. By focusing on a distance based on the diamond norm, we establish a hierarchy of measurement resources and derive analytical bounds on the incompatibility of any set of measurements. We show that these bounds are tight for certain projective measurements based on mutually unbiased bases and identify scenarios where different measurement resources attain the same value when quantified by our resource monotone. Our results provide a general framework to compare distance-based resources for sets of measurements and allow us to obtain limitations on Bell-type experiments.

arXiv:2205.08546•May 17, 2022•1 citation

Quantum Incompatibility Witnesses

Claudio Carmeli, Teiko Heinosaari, Alessandro Toigo

We demonstrate that quantum incompatibility can always be detected by means of a state discrimination task with partial intermediate information. This is done by showing that only incompatible measurements allow for an efficient use of premeasurement information in order to improve the probability of guessing the correct state. Thus, the gap between the guessing probabilities with pre- and postmeasurement information is a witness of the incompatibility of a given collection of measurements. We prove that all linear incompatibility witnesses can be implemented as some state discrimination protocol according to this scheme. As an application, we characterize the joint measurability region of two noisy mutually unbiased bases.

arXiv:1812.02985•Physical Review Letters•Apr 2, 2019•102 citations
Abstract Quantum incompatibility is a fundamental property in quantum physics and is considered as a resource in quantum information processing tasks. Here, we construct a framework based on the incompatibility witness originated from quantum state discrimination. In this framework, we discuss the geometrical properties of the witnesses with noisy mutually unbiased bases and construct a quantifier of quantum incompatibility associated with geometrical information. Furthermore, we explore the incompatibility of a pair of positive operator valued measurements, which only depends on the information of measurements, and discuss the incompatibility of measurements which can be discriminated by mutually unbiased bases. Finally, if we take a resource-theory perspective, the new-defined quantifier can characterize the resource of incompatibility. This geometrical framework gives the evidence that vectors can be utilized to describe resourceful incompatibility and make a step to explore geometrical features of quantum resources.
Incompatible measurements are of fundamental importance to revealing the peculiar features of quantum theory, and are also useful resources in various quantum information tasks. In this work, we investigate the quantum incompatibility of mutually unbiased bases (MUBs) within the operational framework of quantum resource theory, and report an experimental validation via the task of state discrimination. In particular, we construct an experimentally friendly witness to detect incompatible MUBs, based on the probability of correctly discriminating quantum states. Furthermore, we prove that the noise robustness of MUBs can be retrieved from violating the above witness. Finally, we experimentally test the incompatibility of MUBs of dimensionality ranging from 2 to 4, and demonstrate that it is more robust to noise, as either the dimensionality of measurements or the number of MUBs increases. Our results may aid the exploration of the essential roles of incompatible measurements in both theoretical and practical applications in quantum information.
Quantum incompatibility, as an important quantum resource, is believed to play a key role in quantum information processing tasks.In order to detect this property, an entanglement-free incompatibility witness is proposed via constructing a combined quantum state discrimination task with prior-measurement and postmeasurement information strategies.Here we experimentally implement the witness of the incompatibility of mutually unbiased measurements under different noise levels in a qutrit system.Moreover, we estimate the robustness of incompatibility using collected data.Our work paves the path for understanding quantum incompatibility and exploring the features of the quantum resource.
Pivotal within quantum physics, the concept of quantum incompatibility is generally related to algebraic aspects of the formalism, such as commutation relations and unbiasedness of bases. Recently, the concept was identified as a resource in tasks involving quantum state discrimination and quantum programmability. Here, we link quantum incompatibility with the amount of information that can be extracted from a system upon successive measurements of noncommuting observables, a scenario related to communication tasks. This approach leads us to characterize incompatibility as a resource encoded in a physical context, which involves both the quantum state and observables. Moreover, starting with a measure of context incompatibility we derive a measurement-incompatibility quantifier that is easily computable, admits a geometrical interpretation, and is maximum only if the eigenbases of the involved observables are mutually unbiased.
The advantage that quantum systems provide for certain quantum information processing tasks over their classical counterparts can be quantified within the general framework of resource theories. Certain distance functions between quantum states have successfully been used to quantify resources like entanglement and coherence. Perhaps surprisingly, such a distance-based approach has not been adopted to study resources of quantum measurements, where other geometric quantifiers are used instead. Here, we define distance functions between sets of quantum measurements and show that they naturally induce resource monotones for convex resource theories of measurements. By focusing on a distance based on the diamond norm, we establish a hierarchy of measurement resources and derive analytical bounds on the incompatibility of any set of measurements. We show that these bounds are tight for certain projective measurements based on mutually unbiased bases and identify scenarios where different measurement resources attain the same value when quantified by our resource monotone. Our results provide a general framework to compare distance-based resources for sets of measurements and allow us to obtain limitations on Bell-type experiments.
The advantage that quantum systems provide for certain quantum information processing tasks over their classical counterparts can be quantified within the general framework of resource theories. Certain distance functions between quantum states have successfully been used to quantify resources like entanglement and coherence. Perhaps surprisingly, such a distance-based approach has not been adopted to study resources of quantum measurements, where other geometric quantifiers are used instead. Here, we define distance functions between sets of quantum measurements and show that they naturally induce resource monotones for convex resource theories of measurements. By focusing on a distance based on the diamond norm, we establish a hierarchy of measurement resources and derive analytical bounds on the incompatibility of any set of measurements. We show that these bounds are tight for certain projective measurements based on mutually unbiased bases and identify scenarios where different measurement resources attain the same value when quantified by our resource monotone. Our results provide a general framework to compare distance-based resources for sets of measurements and allow us to obtain limitations on Bell-type experiments.
We demonstrate that quantum incompatibility can always be detected by means of a state discrimination task with partial intermediate information. This is done by showing that only incompatible measurements allow for an efficient use of premeasurement information in order to improve the probability of guessing the correct state. Thus, the gap between the guessing probabilities with pre- and postmeasurement information is a witness of the incompatibility of a given collection of measurements. We prove that all linear incompatibility witnesses can be implemented as some state discrimination protocol according to this scheme. As an application, we characterize the joint measurability region of two noisy mutually unbiased bases.