Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature Computational Science

Neural-network wavefunctions

Kaitlin McCardle

Published May 17, 2022• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/s43588-022-00258-5

Related papers

Probing the quantum critical phase with neural network wavefunctions

Haoxiang Chen, Weiluo Ren, Xiang Li +1 more

Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jun 9, 2025•0 citations

Ab initio quantum chemistry with neural-network wavefunctions

Jan Hermann, JAMES M. SPENCER, Kenny Choo +5 more

arXiv:2208.12590•Nature Reviews Chemistry•Aug 9, 2023•131 citations

Autoregressive neural-network wavefunctions for ab initio quantum chemistry

Thomas D. Barrett, Aleksei Malyshev, Alexander I. Lvovsky

Nature Machine Intelligence•Mar 31, 2022•92 citations

Machine learning wavefunction

Stefano Battaglia

arXiv:2202.13916•Elsevier eBooks•Sep 23, 2022•4 citations

WF-Bench: A Benchmark for Neural Network WaveFunction Expressivity and Scaling Laws

Lixing Zhang, Guijing Duan, Di Luo

We present a comprehensive benchmarking dataset and empirical scaling law analysis for neural network wavefunctions by matching them to a wide spectrum of famous many body target wavefunctions. The dataset, WF-Bench, spans multiple distinct regimes of strongly correlated quantum matter, including topological states, Wigner crystals, and superconducting wavefunctions, providing a diverse and challenging test bed for neural network wavefunction expressivity. We introduce a systematic and reproducible benchmarking protocol for target wavefunction matching, enabling consistent performance evaluation across different neural network wavefunction architectures. By using wavefunction fidelity as the uniform metric, we discover empirical scaling laws that characterize how representability depends on system size and key model parameters, including number of determinant and model depth. By applying our benchmark protocol on Psiformer and Ferminet, we show that WF-Bench establishes a unified dataset driven framework for evaluating and comparing neural network wavefunctions and for guiding the design of future architectures.

arXiv:2605.29683•May 28, 2026•0 citations

Generalized Neural Wave Functions

Nicholas Gao, Stephan Günnemann, Technische Universität München

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations
We present a comprehensive benchmarking dataset and empirical scaling law analysis for neural network wavefunctions by matching them to a wide spectrum of famous many body target wavefunctions. The dataset, WF-Bench, spans multiple distinct regimes of strongly correlated quantum matter, including topological states, Wigner crystals, and superconducting wavefunctions, providing a diverse and challenging test bed for neural network wavefunction expressivity. We introduce a systematic and reproducible benchmarking protocol for target wavefunction matching, enabling consistent performance evaluation across different neural network wavefunction architectures. By using wavefunction fidelity as the uniform metric, we discover empirical scaling laws that characterize how representability depends on system size and key model parameters, including number of determinant and model depth. By applying our benchmark protocol on Psiformer and Ferminet, we show that WF-Bench establishes a unified dataset driven framework for evaluating and comparing neural network wavefunctions and for guiding the design of future architectures.