Quantum Collision Course

Barry R. Clarke

Jingfu Zhang, Zhi-Heng Lu

By studying the attribute of the inversion about average operation in quantum searching algorithm, we find the similarity between the quantum searching and the course of two rigid bodies'collision. Some related questions are discussed from this similarity.

Sergei I Yakovlenko

A theory is given of radiative collisions, i.e., of elementary events in which the emission of a photon occurs in the course of a collision. Special attention is paid to radiative collisions stimulated by a laser field. Simple but clear approaches formulated in the forties or fifties are described briefly. This theory applies, in particular, to collisions in a strong electromagnetic field which affect the collision dynamics. Chemical radiative collisions, i.e., chemical reactions stimulated by photons absorbed in the course of a collision, are reviewed. An analysis is made of several recent experiments in which the theoretically predicted effects were observed: these include the radiative-collisional transfer of excitation from atom to atom, nonlinear effects due to the influence of the field on the collision dynamics, and photosubstitution of one of the atoms in a halogen molecule with an inert gas atom.

Klaas Landsman

The measurement problem of quantum mechanics was probably born in 1926: ‘Thus Schrödinger’s quantum mechanics gives a very definite answer to the question of the outcome of a collision; however, this does not involve any causal relationship. One obtains no answer to the question “what is the state after the collision,” but only to the question “how probable is a specific outcome of the collision” (in which the quantum-mechanical law of [conservation of] energy must of course be satisfied). This raises the entire problem of determinism. From the standpoint of our quantum mechanics, there is no quantity that could causally establish the outcome of a collision in each individual case; however, so far we are not aware of any experimental clue to the effect that there are internal properties of atoms that enforce some particular outcome. Should we hope to discover such properties that determine individual outcomes later (perhaps phases of the internal atomic motions)? Or should we believe that the agreement between theory and experiment concerning our inability to give conditions for a causal course of events is some pre-established harmony that is based on the non-existence of such conditions? I myself tend to relinquish determinism in the atomic world. But this is [also] a philosophical question, for which physical arguments alone are not decisive.’ (Born, 1926a, p. 866; translation by the author) These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Azeem