Examples of how GTi can ground existing theories: generativity → relations → Rovelli (RQM) generativity → information → Wheeler generativity → geometry → Penrose generativity → spectra → spectral models generativity → biological networks → morphogenesis generativity → cognition → awareness models These examples illustrate the breadth of what GTi can explain. A concrete demonstration is provided in the publication “Generative Interpretation of Quantum Entanglement” (Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/19058217), where entanglementis shown not as a mysterious quantum link, but as the observable trace of a shared generative origin. GTi (Generative Theory of ilons) introduces a generative ontology at level 0 — a pre‑relational, pre‑informational and pre‑structural foundation that explains how the first structures of reality can arise. To our knowledge, no such generative foundation has previously existed in the scientific literature. Most theories begin with relations, information, geometry, spectra, or biological organization already in place. GTi precedes all of them by providing the minimal generative substrate from which these structures can emerge. GTi is not a physical theory and not a model of any specific domain. It is a universal generative skeleton, capable of supporting many different interpretive frameworks. Each continuation of GTi arises through the choice of a functor written linearlyas: H: Set → C, where C is a category of structures. This makes GTi compatible with a wide range of scientific theories, each representing a different continuation of the generative substrate. The purpose of this publication is to present GTi as a new generative foundation and to invite researchers to develop their own continuations. GTi offers a clean, minimal and mathematically precise starting point for embedding diverse scientific theories into a common generative framework. Researchers in physics, information theory, biology, cognitive science, mathematics, philosophy of science and complexity theory are warmly invited to explore how their models may be grounded in GTi. Author: Waldemar Superson
This work aims at exploring whether the nonlocal correlations due to quantum entanglement could exist without nonlocal causation. This is done with the aid of a toy model to investigate whether the ability of two quantum entangled particles to "correlate" their behaviors even at very large distances and in the absence of any physical connection can be seen as due to an exchange of information through an extra-temporal dimension. Since superluminal information exchange is forbidden in our (3,1) spacetime, an extra-temporal dimension is needed to recover the physical picture of finite velocity information exchange between entangled entities. Assuming that the geometry of space-time of dimension (3,2) is described by a metric containing a warping factor, the confinement of the massive particles in the extra time dimension follows. Therefore, why we do not experience an infinitely large extra time dimension can be explained. The toy model proposed here is defined by borrowing Bohm-Bub's proposal to describe the wavefunction collapse using nonlinear (non-unitary) dynamical equations and then elaborating this approach for an entangled system. The model so obtained is just speculative without any claim of being robust against any criticism, nevertheless, it satisfies the purpose of giving the possibility to the hypotheses formulated above to be verified experimentally; in fact, it proposes an experiment potentially interesting which would otherwise be immediately dismissed as manifestly trivial. The proposed experiment would consist of checking the possible violation of Bell's inequality between two identical but independent systems under appropriate conditions. Beyond its theoretical interest, entanglement is a key topic in quantum computing and quantum technologies, so any attempt to gain a deeper understanding of it could be useful.
This work aims at exploring whether the nonlocal correlations due to quantum entanglement could exist without nonlocal causation. This is done with the aid of a toy model to investigate whether the ability of two quantum entangled particles to “correlate” their behaviors even at very large distances and in the absence of any physical connection can be seen as due to an exchange of information through an extra-temporal dimension. Since superluminal information exchange is forbidden in our (3,1) spacetime, an extra-temporal dimension is needed to recover the physical picture of finite velocity information exchange between entangled entities. Assuming that the geometry of spacetime of dimension (3,2) is described by a metric containing a warping factor, the confinement of the massive particles in the extra time dimension follows. Therefore why we do not experience an infinitely large extra time dimension can be explained. The toy model proposed here is defined by borrowing Bohm-Bub's proposal to describe the wave function collapse using nonlinear (nonunitary) dynamical equations and then elaborating this approach for an entangled system. The model thus obtained aims to be a first step into unexplored territory, certainly a model that can be improved, but which already satisfies the purpose of giving the possibility to the hypotheses formulated above to be experimentally verified. The required experimental test has to resort to an unusual experiment which would otherwise be immediately dismissed as manifestly trivial. The proposed experiment would consist of checking the possible violation of Bell's inequality between two identical but independent systems under appropriate conditions. Beyond its theoretical interest, entanglement is a key topic in quantum computing and quantum technologies, so any attempt to gain a deeper understanding of it could be useful.