Having achieved this point we hope to have accomplished, at least partly, our main aim which was to convince the reader that once appropriate systems have been found (or built) they can present a very peculiar combination of microscopic parameters in such a way that quantum mechanics should be applied to general macroscopic variables to describe the collective effects therein. Moreover, the very nature of these macroscopic variables does not allow them to be treated in an isolated fashion. They must rather be considered coupled to uncontrollable microscopic degrees of freedom which is the ultimate origin of dissipative phenomena. The latter, at least in the great majority of cases, play a very deleterious role in the dynamics of the macroscopic variables and we hope to have introduced minimal phenomenological techniques in order to quantify this. We have concentrated our discussions on questions originating from a few examples of superconducting or magnetic systems where quantum mechanics and dissipative effects coexist. In particular, superconducting devices which present the possibility of displaying several different quantum effects (quantum interference, decay by quantum tunneling, or coherent tunneling) are of special importance, as we will see below. Prior to development of the modern cryogenic techniques and/or the ability to build nanometric devices, it was unthinkable to imagine the existence of subtle quantum mechanical effects such as the entanglement of macroscopically distinct quantum states.
Having achieved this point we hope to have accomplished, at least partly, our main aim which was to convince the reader that once appropriate systems have been found (or built) they can present a very peculiar combination of microscopic parameters in such a way that quantum mechanics should be applied to general macroscopic variables to describe the collective effects therein. Moreover, the very nature of these macroscopic variables does not allow them to be treated in an isolated fashion. They must rather be considered coupled to uncontrollable microscopic degrees of freedom which is the ultimate origin of dissipative phenomena. The latter, at least in the great majority of cases, play a very deleterious role in the dynamics of the macroscopic variables and we hope to have introduced minimal phenomenological techniques in order to quantify this. We have concentrated our discussions on questions originating from a few examples of superconducting or magnetic systems where quantum mechanics and dissipative effects coexist. In particular, superconducting devices which present the possibility of displaying several different quantum effects (quantum interference, decay by quantum tunneling, or coherent tunneling) are of special importance, as we will see below. Prior to development of the modern cryogenic techniques and/or the ability to build nanometric devices, it was unthinkable to imagine the existence of subtle quantum mechanical effects such as the entanglement of macroscopically distinct quantum states.
In the two preceding chapters of this book we have analyzed many interesting physical phenomena in magnetic and superconducting systems which could adequately be described by phenomenological dynamical equations in terms of collective classical variables. One unavoidable consequence of this approach is that, as we are always dealing with variables that describe only part of the whole system, the interaction with the remaining degrees of freedom shows up through the presence of non-conservative terms which describe the relaxation of those variables to equilibrium. Those phenomenological equations are able to describe a very rich diversity of physical phenomena, in particular, those which can be studied in the context of quantum mechanics. Since these are genuine dynamical equations, there is no reason why they should be restricted to classical physics. However, as we do not yet know how to treat dissipative effects in quantum mechanics, we have deliberately neglected those terms when trying to describe quantum mechanical effects of our collective variables. In this chapter we will describe the general approach to dealing with dissipation in quantum mechanics. However, before we embark on this enterprise we should spend some time learning a little bit about the classical behavior of dissipative systems. In this way we can develop some intuition on how systems evolve during a dissipative process and, hopefully, this will be useful later on when we deal with quantum mechanical systems. The immediate problem we have to face concerns the choice of dissipative system to be studied.
Since its very beginning, quantum mechanics has been developed to deal with systems on the atomic or sub-atomic scale. For many decades, there has been no reason to think about its application to macroscopic systems. Actually, macroscopic objects have even been used to show how bizarre quantum effects would appear if quantum mechanics were applied beyond its original realm. This is, for example, the essence of the so-called Schrödinger cat paradox (Schrödinger, 1935). How-ever, due to recent advances in the design of systems on the meso- and nanoscopic scales, as well as in cryogenic techniques, this situation has changed drastically. It is now quite natural to ask whether a specific quantum effect, collectively involving a macroscopic number of particles, could occur in these systems. In this book it is our intention to address the quantum mechanical effects that take place in properly chosen or built “macroscopic” systems. Starting from a very naïve point of view, we could always ask what happens to systems whose classical dynamics can be described by equations of motion equivalent to those of particles (or fields) in a given potential (or potential energy density). These can be represented by a generalized “coordinate” φ( r , t ) which could either describe a field variable or a “point particle” if it is not position dependent, φ( r , t ) = φ( t ).
When the revolutionary conceptual structure for the description of the physical world which we know as quantum mechanics was first formulated nearly 90 years ago, and its predictions tested in the laboratory, most of the experiments in question were on systems which were both very well characterized and reasonably well isolated from their environments, such as single electrons and atoms, small molecules and near-perfect crystalline solids. While from the very start most physicists have taken it for granted that the formalism of quantum mechanics, when combined with appropriate system-specific information, can “in principle” account for all phenomena occurring in the physical world, including those usually regarded as the subject-matter of biology, until quite recently the overwhelmingly majority opinion has been that in a biological context the role of quantum theory is confined to elucidating the equilibrium structures of the relevant molecules and their reaction processes, and that subtle phenomena such as superposition and entanglement, of which we can now routinely exhibit spectacular effects at the level of a few well-isolated photons or atoms, play at most a very indirect role in any phenomena of biological interest. A major reason conventionally given for this view has been that biological systems, at least working ones, are by their very nature “warm and wet” – a phrase which in the physicist's lexicon translates to “prone to massive decoherence”; it looks as though any interesting superposition, say of different energy eigenstates of one's system, would be rapidly decohered by the ever-present, and usually microscopically very complex, environment.
Reviewing macroscopic quantum phenomena and quantum dissipation, from the phenomenology of magnetism and superconductivity to the presentation of alternative models for quantum dissipation, this book develops the basic material necessary to understand the quantum dynamics of macroscopic variables. Macroscopic quantum phenomena are presented through several examples in magnetism and superconductivity, developed from general phenomenological approaches to each area. Dissipation naturally plays an important role in these phenomena, and therefore semi-empirical models for quantum dissipation are introduced and applied to the study of a few important quantum mechanical effects. The book also discusses the relevance of macroscopic quantum phenomena to the control of meso- or nanoscopic devices, particularly those with potential applications in quantum computation or quantum information. It is ideal for graduate students and researchers.
While some of the deepest results in nature are those that give explicit bounds between important physical quantities, some of the most intriguing and celebrated of such bounds come from fields where there is still a great deal of disagreement and confusion regarding even the most fundamental aspects of the theories. For example, in quantum mechanics, there is still no complete consensus as to whether the limitations associated with Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle derive from an inherent randomness in physics, or rather from limitations in the measurement process itself, resulting from phenomena like back action. Likewise, the second law of thermodynamics makes a statement regarding the increase in entropy of closed systems, yet the theory itself has neither a universally-accepted definition of equilibrium, nor an adequate explanation of how a system with underlying microscopically Hamiltonian dynamics (reversible) settles into a fixed distribution. Motivated by these physical theories, and perhaps their inconsistencies, in this thesis we use dynamical systems theory to investigate how the very simplest of systems, even with no physical constraints, are characterized by bounds that give limits to the ability to make measurements on them. Using an existing interpretation, we start by examining how dissipative systems can be viewed as high-dimensional lossless systems, and how taking this view necessarily implies the existence of a noise process that results from the uncertainty in the initial system state. This fluctuation-dissipation result plays a central role in a measurement model that we examine, in particular describing how noise is inevitably injected into a system during a measurement, noise that can be viewed as originating either from the randomness of the many degrees of freedom of the measurement device, or of the environment. This noise constitutes one component of measurement back action, and ultimately imposes limits on measurement uncertainty. Depending on the assumptions we make about active devices, and their limitations, this back action can be offset to varying degrees via control. It turns out that using active devices to reduce measurement back action leads to estimation problems that have non-zero uncertainty lower bounds, the most interesting of which arise when the observed system is lossless. One such lower bound, a main contribution of this work, can be viewed as a classical version of a Heisenberg uncertainty relation between the system's position and momentum. We finally also revisit the murky question of how macroscopic dissipation appears from lossless dynamics, and propose alternative approaches for framing the question using existing systematic methods of model reduction.