Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Birkhäuser Boston eBooks

Fourier uncertainty principles

Published Dec 20, 2007• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A mathematical uncertainty principle is an inequality or uniqueness theorem concerning the joint localization of a function or system and its spectrum. A Fourier uncertainty principle is thus a statement that a function and its Fourier transform cannot both decay too rapidly. The most familiar form is the Wiener-Heisenberg inequality, 5.1 $$ \left\| {(x - x_0 )f(x)} \right\|_2 \left\| {(\xi - \xi _0 )\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{f} (\xi )} \right\|_2 \geqslant \frac{{\mathop {\left\| f \right\|}\nolimits_2^2 }} {{4\pi }},$$ which becomes an equality only for multiples of Gaussians of the form exp(−πα(x − x0)2 + 2πiξ0x). In this chapter, D will denote the normalized differentiation or momentum operator D = (1/2πi)d/dx. The inequality (5.1) is often written 5.2 $$ \sigma _X (f)\sigma _D (f) \equiv \left\| {Xf - \left\langle {Xf,f} \right\rangle f} \right\|_2 \left\| {Df - \left\langle {Df,f} \right\rangle f} \right\|_2 \geqslant 1,$$ where X is the multiplication operator f(x) ↦ xf(x). Barnes [22] attributes the first proof of (5.1) to a lecture delivered by Wiener in Hilbert’s mathematical physics seminar in Göttingen in 1925. In fact, Wiener discusses this lecture, though not the explicit proof of (5.1), at length in his autobiography (see [365], p. 105). What distinguished Wiener’s approach, however, was his macroscopic interpretation of (5.1), a point of view that led to further important achievements, including the Landau, Pollack and Slepian “Bell Labs” uncertainty principles in Chapter 3

DOI
10.1007/0-8176-4431-8_5

Related papers

Uncertainty principles invariant under the fractional Fourier transform

David Mustard

Abstract Uncertainty principles like Heisenberg's assert an inequality obeyed by some measure of joint uncertainty associated with a function and its Fourier transform. The more groups under which that measure is invariant, the more that measure represents an intrinsic property of the underlying object represented by the given function. The Fourier transform is imbedded in a continuous group of operators, the fractional Fourier transforms, but the Heisenberg measure of overall spread turns out not to be invariant under that group. A new family is developed of measures that are invariant under the group of fractional Fourier transforms and that obey associated uncertainty principles. The first member corresponds to Heisenberg's measure but is generally smaller than his although equal to it in special cases.

ANZIAM Journal•Oct 1, 1991•56 citations

THE HEISENBERG INEQUALITY ON ABSTRACT WIENER SPACES

Yuh-Jia Lee

【The Heisenberg inequality associated with the uncertainty principle is extended to an infinite dimensional abstract Wiener space (H, B) with an abstract Wiener measure p $_1$ . For $\phi$ $\in$ L $^2$ (p $_1$ ) and T $\in$ L(B, H), it is shown that (※Equations, See Full-text), where F(sub) $\phi$ is the Fourier-Wiener transform of $\phi$ . The conditions when the equality holds also discussed.】

Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society•Jan 1, 2001•1 citation

The Derivation and Some Explanations of the Uncertainty Principle

Haoran Huang

This paper is a small discussion about the uncertainty principle. With the great discoveries and researches made by predecessors, I try to answer some questions within the uncertainty principle. Using the definition of momentum, the momentum in de Broglie wave, the property of cosine function, the Euler’s formula, the basic property of plane wave, the law of derivative, the energy of quantum discovered by Max Planck, the photon energy discovered by Albert Einstein, the energy equation of a system and the Hamiltonian operator, I figure out the Schrodinger equation successfully. With the help of Schrodinger equation, the possibility density of a wave function, the concept of normalization, the average value of position and momentum, the Fourier transform, the integration by parts and the limit of normalized wave functions, I find the position operator and the momentum operator. Then using some knowledge of the standard deviation and the variance, the concept of inner product of vectors, some property of Dirac symbol, the law of calculation of complex number and the law of operator calculation, I obtain the general uncertainty relationship of abstract mathematical quantities. According to the general relationship, I get the inequality of uncertainty principle, and discuss the specific relationship between the position and the momentum. After getting the inequality, I use Heisenberg’s experiment of measuring an electron by using the γ ray to hit the electron to explain why we cannot measure the position and the momentum simultaneously. Based on Heisenberg’s experiment, I give my own explanation by discussing the earth and a spacecraft. Transforming the perspective, we can easily see how the accuracies of position and momentum change. In addition, I attempt to figure out why the uncertainty exists. However, I can only explain it by discussing the time and frequency in mathematical method and have no idea to work it out in a pure physics approach.

Highlights in Science Engineering and Technology•Jul 30, 2023•0 citations

Inequalities and local uncertainty principles

John Price

Inequalities for Fourier transforms are developed which describe local uncertainty principles in the sense that if the uncertainty of momentum is small, then so is the probability of being localized at any point. They give estimates for essentially all states and lead to lower bounds for Hamiltonians.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 1983•108 citations

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle

Floyd L. Williams

We establish in this section an integral 6.1.1 $$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \hfill {\left[ {\int_{\mathbb{R}} {{{{(x - b)}}^{2}}|\psi (x)} {{|}^{2}}dx} \right]\left[ {\int_{\mathbb{R}} {|\psi \prime (x){{|}^{2}}dx - 2ia} \int_{\mathbb{R}} {\psi \prime (x)\bar{\psi }(x)dx} } \right.} \\ \hfill {\left. { + {{a}^{2}}\int_{\mathbb{R}} {|\psi (x){{|}^{2}}dx} } \right] \geqslant \frac{1}{4}{{{\left[ {\int_{\mathbb{R}} {|\psi (x){{|}^{2}}dx} } \right]}}^{2}},} \\ \end{array}$$ to as Heisenberg’s inequality, for a sufficiently nice function Ψ : ℝ → ℂ where a, b ∈ ℝ. Even though Ψ is allowed to be complex-valued the second factor on the left-hand side of (6.1.1) will be non-negative. This inequality, which is a purely mathematical result of course, will be shown to form the basis for a precise formulation of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. The discussion of this principle in Chapter 1 was brief and non-rigorous. For now, we proceed strictly along mathematical lines.

Progress in mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2003•7 citations

Mathematics Behind the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Dewi Wulandari

Most physics books do not reveal clearly how the Heisenberg uncertainty principle was derived. This uncertainty comes from the consequence of the wave-particle duality of matter giving statement that position and momentum cannot be measured in the same time. This article tries to reveal mathematics background behind the expression the Heisenberg uncertainty using supported mathematics background such as Fourier transform, Fourier transform integral, the probability of Gaussian distribution and it ends up with the expression of wave function which describe the localized particle giving relation Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA•Apr 30, 2023•0 citations
A mathematical uncertainty principle is an inequality or uniqueness theorem concerning the joint localization of a function or system and its spectrum. A Fourier uncertainty principle is thus a statement that a function and its Fourier transform cannot both decay too rapidly. The most familiar form is the Wiener-Heisenberg inequality, 5.1 ∥(x−x0)f(x)∥2∥(ξ−ξ0)f\lower0.5em⌢(ξ)∥2⩾∥f∥224π, \left\| {(x - x_0 )f(x)} \right\|_2 \left\| {(\xi - \xi _0 )\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{f} (\xi )} \right\|_2 \geqslant \frac{{\mathop {\left\| f \right\|}\nolimits_2^2 }} {{4\pi }},∥(x−x0​)f(x)∥2​​(ξ−ξ0​)f\lower0.5em⌢​(ξ)​2​⩾4π∥f∥22​​, which becomes an equality only for multiples of Gaussians of the form exp(−πα(x − x0)2 + 2πiξ0x). In this chapter, D will denote the normalized differentiation or momentum operator D = (1/2πi)d/dx. The inequality (5.1) is often written 5.2 σX(f)σD(f)≡∥Xf−⟨Xf,f⟩f∥2∥Df−⟨Df,f⟩f∥2⩾1, \sigma _X (f)\sigma _D (f) \equiv \left\| {Xf - \left\langle {Xf,f} \right\rangle f} \right\|_2 \left\| {Df - \left\langle {Df,f} \right\rangle f} \right\|_2 \geqslant 1,σX​(f)σD​(f)≡∥Xf−⟨Xf,f⟩f∥2​∥Df−⟨Df,f⟩f∥2​⩾1, where X is the multiplication operator f(x) ↦ xf(x). Barnes [22] attributes the first proof of (5.1) to a lecture delivered by Wiener in Hilbert’s mathematical physics seminar in Göttingen in 1925. In fact, Wiener discusses this lecture, though not the explicit proof of (5.1), at length in his autobiography (see [365], p. 105). What distinguished Wiener’s approach, however, was his macroscopic interpretation of (5.1), a point of view that led to further important achievements, including the Landau, Pollack and Slepian “Bell Labs” uncertainty principles in Chapter 3
Abstract Uncertainty principles like Heisenberg's assert an inequality obeyed by some measure of joint uncertainty associated with a function and its Fourier transform. The more groups under which that measure is invariant, the more that measure represents an intrinsic property of the underlying object represented by the given function. The Fourier transform is imbedded in a continuous group of operators, the fractional Fourier transforms, but the Heisenberg measure of overall spread turns out not to be invariant under that group. A new family is developed of measures that are invariant under the group of fractional Fourier transforms and that obey associated uncertainty principles. The first member corresponds to Heisenberg's measure but is generally smaller than his although equal to it in special cases.
【The Heisenberg inequality associated with the uncertainty principle is extended to an infinite dimensional abstract Wiener space (H, B) with an abstract Wiener measure p 1_11​ . For ϕ\phiϕ ∈\in∈ L 2^22 (p 1_11​ ) and T ∈\in∈ L(B, H), it is shown that (※Equations, See Full-text), where F(sub) ϕ\phiϕ is the Fourier-Wiener transform of ϕ\phiϕ . The conditions when the equality holds also discussed.】
This paper is a small discussion about the uncertainty principle. With the great discoveries and researches made by predecessors, I try to answer some questions within the uncertainty principle. Using the definition of momentum, the momentum in de Broglie wave, the property of cosine function, the Euler’s formula, the basic property of plane wave, the law of derivative, the energy of quantum discovered by Max Planck, the photon energy discovered by Albert Einstein, the energy equation of a system and the Hamiltonian operator, I figure out the Schrodinger equation successfully. With the help of Schrodinger equation, the possibility density of a wave function, the concept of normalization, the average value of position and momentum, the Fourier transform, the integration by parts and the limit of normalized wave functions, I find the position operator and the momentum operator. Then using some knowledge of the standard deviation and the variance, the concept of inner product of vectors, some property of Dirac symbol, the law of calculation of complex number and the law of operator calculation, I obtain the general uncertainty relationship of abstract mathematical quantities. According to the general relationship, I get the inequality of uncertainty principle, and discuss the specific relationship between the position and the momentum. After getting the inequality, I use Heisenberg’s experiment of measuring an electron by using the γ ray to hit the electron to explain why we cannot measure the position and the momentum simultaneously. Based on Heisenberg’s experiment, I give my own explanation by discussing the earth and a spacecraft. Transforming the perspective, we can easily see how the accuracies of position and momentum change. In addition, I attempt to figure out why the uncertainty exists. However, I can only explain it by discussing the time and frequency in mathematical method and have no idea to work it out in a pure physics approach.
We establish in this section an integral 6.1.1 $$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \hfill {\left[ {\int_{\mathbb{R}} {{{{(x - b)}}^{2}}|\psi (x)} {{|}^{2}}dx} \right]\left[ {\int_{\mathbb{R}} {|\psi \prime (x){{|}^{2}}dx - 2ia} \int_{\mathbb{R}} {\psi \prime (x)\bar{\psi }(x)dx} } \right.} \\ \hfill {\left. { + {{a}^{2}}\int_{\mathbb{R}} {|\psi (x){{|}^{2}}dx} } \right] \geqslant \frac{1}{4}{{{\left[ {\int_{\mathbb{R}} {|\psi (x){{|}^{2}}dx} } \right]}}^{2}},} \\ \end{array}$$ to as Heisenberg’s inequality, for a sufficiently nice function Ψ : ℝ → ℂ where a, b ∈ ℝ. Even though Ψ is allowed to be complex-valued the second factor on the left-hand side of (6.1.1) will be non-negative. This inequality, which is a purely mathematical result of course, will be shown to form the basis for a precise formulation of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. The discussion of this principle in Chapter 1 was brief and non-rigorous. For now, we proceed strictly along mathematical lines.
Most physics books do not reveal clearly how the Heisenberg uncertainty principle was derived. This uncertainty comes from the consequence of the wave-particle duality of matter giving statement that position and momentum cannot be measured in the same time. This article tries to reveal mathematics background behind the expression the Heisenberg uncertainty using supported mathematics background such as Fourier transform, Fourier transform integral, the probability of Gaussian distribution and it ends up with the expression of wave function which describe the localized particle giving relation Heisenberg uncertainty principle.