Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Bosonization I: The Fermion–Boson Dictionary

R. Shankar

Published Aug 31, 2017• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1017/9781139044349.017

Related papers

Bosonization II: Selected Applications

R. Shankar

“Bosonization” refers to the possibility of describing a theory of relativistic Dirac fermions obeying standard anticommutation rules by a boson field theory. While this may be possible in all dimensions, it has so far proved most useful in d = 1, where the bosonic version of the given fermionic theory is local and simple, and often simpler than the Fermi theory. This chapter should be viewed as a stepping stone toward a more thorough approach, for which references are given at the end. In this chapter I will set up the bosonization machine, explaining its basic logic and the dictionary for transcribing a fermionic theory to a bosonic theory. The next chapter will be devoted to applications. To my knowledge, bosonization, as described here, was first carried out by Lieb and Mattis [1] in their exact solution of the Luttinger model [2]. Later, Luther and Peschel [3] showed how to use it to find asymptotic (low momentum and energy) correlation functions for more generic interacting Fermi systems. It was independently discovered in particle physics by Coleman [4], and further developed by Mandelstam [5]. Much of what I know and use is inspired by the work of Luther and Peschel. Preamble Before getting into any details, I would first like to answer two questions. First, if bosonization applies only to relativistic Dirac fermions, why is it of any interest to condensed matter theory where relativity is not essential? Second, what is the magic by which bosonization helps us tame interacting field theories? As for the first question, there are two ways in which Dirac fermions enter condensed matter physics. The first is in the study of two-dimensional Ising models, where we have already encountered them. Recall that if we use the transfer matrix approach and convert the classical problem on an N × N lattice to a quantum problem in one dimension we end up with a 2 N -dimensional Hilbert space, with a Pauli matrix at each of N sites. The two dimensions at each site represent the twofold choice of values open to the Ising spins. Consider now a spinless fermion degree of freedom at each site. Here too we have two choices: the fermion state is occupied or empty.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 31, 2017•3 citations

Bosonization of fermion interaction

Seiju Ami

•Sep 13, 1996•0 citations

One-Dimensional Fermions and Bosonization

Yoshio Kuramoto

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2020•1 citation

Exact Operator Fractionalization and Edge Physics in the Lowest-Landau-Level

Arkadiusz Bochniak, Zohar Nussinov, Alexander Seidel +1 more

Advancing a microscopic field-theoretic framework that rigorously unveils the underlying topological hallmarks of fractional quantum Hall fluids is a prerequisite for making progress in the classification of strongly-coupled topological matter. Here we expand on such a program and, in particular, address the problems of Laughlin's quasiparticle(hole) operator fractionalization and condensation of non-local operators characterizing topological order in the lowest-Landau-level (LLL). We express the sequence of (both bosonic and fermionic) Laughlin second-quantized states in a manner that highlights the lack of local condensation. In addition, we present a rigorous constructive subspace bosonization dictionary for the bulk fluid and establish the universal long-distance behavior of edge excitations by formulating a conjecture complementary to Wen's.

•Oct 12, 2021•0 citations

Boson description of fermion systems

B. Sørensen

Physics Letters•Oct 1, 1966•9 citations

Mechanism for particle fractionalization and universal edge physics in quantum Hall fluids

Arkadiusz Bochniak, Zohar Nussinov, Alexander Seidel +1 more

Abstract Advancing a microscopic framework that rigorously unveils the underlying topological hallmarks of fractional quantum Hall (FQH) fluids is a prerequisite for making progress in the classification of strongly-coupled topological matter. We present a second-quantization framework that reveals an exact fusion mechanism for particle fractionalization in FQH fluids, and uncovers the fundamental structure behind the condensation of non-local operators characterizing topological order in the lowest-Landau-level. We show the first exact analytic computation of the quasielectron Berry connections leading to its fractional charge and exchange statistics, and perform Monte Carlo simulations that numerically confirm the fusion mechanism for quasiparticles. We express the sequence of (bosonic and fermionic) Laughlin second-quantized states, highlighting the lack of local condensation, and present a rigorous constructive subspace bosonization dictionary for the bulk fluid. Finally, we establish universal long-distance behavior of edge excitations by formulating a conjecture based on the DNA, or root state, of the FQH fluid.

arXiv:2110.06216•Communications Physics•Jul 1, 2022•5 citations
“Bosonization” refers to the possibility of describing a theory of relativistic Dirac fermions obeying standard anticommutation rules by a boson field theory. While this may be possible in all dimensions, it has so far proved most useful in d = 1, where the bosonic version of the given fermionic theory is local and simple, and often simpler than the Fermi theory. This chapter should be viewed as a stepping stone toward a more thorough approach, for which references are given at the end. In this chapter I will set up the bosonization machine, explaining its basic logic and the dictionary for transcribing a fermionic theory to a bosonic theory. The next chapter will be devoted to applications. To my knowledge, bosonization, as described here, was first carried out by Lieb and Mattis [1] in their exact solution of the Luttinger model [2]. Later, Luther and Peschel [3] showed how to use it to find asymptotic (low momentum and energy) correlation functions for more generic interacting Fermi systems. It was independently discovered in particle physics by Coleman [4], and further developed by Mandelstam [5]. Much of what I know and use is inspired by the work of Luther and Peschel. Preamble Before getting into any details, I would first like to answer two questions. First, if bosonization applies only to relativistic Dirac fermions, why is it of any interest to condensed matter theory where relativity is not essential? Second, what is the magic by which bosonization helps us tame interacting field theories? As for the first question, there are two ways in which Dirac fermions enter condensed matter physics. The first is in the study of two-dimensional Ising models, where we have already encountered them. Recall that if we use the transfer matrix approach and convert the classical problem on an N × N lattice to a quantum problem in one dimension we end up with a 2 N -dimensional Hilbert space, with a Pauli matrix at each of N sites. The two dimensions at each site represent the twofold choice of values open to the Ising spins. Consider now a spinless fermion degree of freedom at each site. Here too we have two choices: the fermion state is occupied or empty.
Advancing a microscopic field-theoretic framework that rigorously unveils the underlying topological hallmarks of fractional quantum Hall fluids is a prerequisite for making progress in the classification of strongly-coupled topological matter. Here we expand on such a program and, in particular, address the problems of Laughlin's quasiparticle(hole) operator fractionalization and condensation of non-local operators characterizing topological order in the lowest-Landau-level (LLL). We express the sequence of (both bosonic and fermionic) Laughlin second-quantized states in a manner that highlights the lack of local condensation. In addition, we present a rigorous constructive subspace bosonization dictionary for the bulk fluid and establish the universal long-distance behavior of edge excitations by formulating a conjecture complementary to Wen's.
Abstract Advancing a microscopic framework that rigorously unveils the underlying topological hallmarks of fractional quantum Hall (FQH) fluids is a prerequisite for making progress in the classification of strongly-coupled topological matter. We present a second-quantization framework that reveals an exact fusion mechanism for particle fractionalization in FQH fluids, and uncovers the fundamental structure behind the condensation of non-local operators characterizing topological order in the lowest-Landau-level. We show the first exact analytic computation of the quasielectron Berry connections leading to its fractional charge and exchange statistics, and perform Monte Carlo simulations that numerically confirm the fusion mechanism for quasiparticles. We express the sequence of (bosonic and fermionic) Laughlin second-quantized states, highlighting the lack of local condensation, and present a rigorous constructive subspace bosonization dictionary for the bulk fluid. Finally, we establish universal long-distance behavior of edge excitations by formulating a conjecture based on the DNA, or root state, of the FQH fluid.