Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Generalized Quantum Mechanics

Bogdan Mielnik

Published Jan 1, 1978• 12 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-009-9769-1_4

Related papers

Building a bridge between Classical and Quantum Mechanics

Peter Renkel

The way Quantum Mechanics (QM) is introduced to people used to Classical Mechanics (CM) is by a complete change of the general methodology) despite QM historically stemming from CM as a means to explain experimental results. Therefore, it is desirable to build a bridge from CM to QM. This paper presents a generalization of CM to QM. It starts from the generalization of a point-like object and naturally arrives at the quantum state vector of quantum systems in the complex valued Hilbert space, its time evolution and quantum representation of a measurement apparatus of any size. Each time, when generalization is performed, there is a possibility to develop new theory giving up most simple generalizations. It is shown that a measurement apparatus is a special case of a general quantum object. An example of a measurement apparatus of an intermediate size is considered in the end.

arXiv:1701.04698•Jan 14, 2017•1 citation

Generalized quantum mechanics

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Generalized quantum mechanics

Bogdan Mielnik

Communications in Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 1974•236 citations

On Quantum Mechanics

We discuss the axiomatic basis of quantum mechanics and show that it is neither general nor consistent, since its axioms are incompatible with each other and moreover it does not incorporate the magnetic quantization as in the cyclotron motion. A general and consistent system of axioms is conjectured which incorporates also the magnetic quantization. 1 The neccessity of quantum mechanics (QM) was a result of experimental data for the energy spectrum of atoms which could not be explained in accord with the laws of classical mechanics. Nevertheless in the axiomatic basis of QM there are axioms which are not supported by the experimental results, since the whole system of axioms (1) is introduced only as a ”plausible generalization ” of the first axiom [1]:

•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics as a Natural Generalization of Classical Statistical Mechanics

Qian Shang-Wu

By comparison between equations of motion of geometrical optics(GO)and that of classical statistical mechanics(CSM),we find that there should be an analogy between GO and CSM instead of GO and classical mechanics (CM).Furthermore,by comparison between the classical limit(CL)of quantum mechanics(QM)and CSM,we find that CL of QM is CSM not CM,hence we demonstrate that QM is a natural generalization of CSM instead of CM.

Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis•Jan 1, 1994•0 citations

General Quantum Mechanics

Princeton University Press eBooks•Jun 16, 2020•0 citations
The way Quantum Mechanics (QM) is introduced to people used to Classical Mechanics (CM) is by a complete change of the general methodology) despite QM historically stemming from CM as a means to explain experimental results. Therefore, it is desirable to build a bridge from CM to QM. This paper presents a generalization of CM to QM. It starts from the generalization of a point-like object and naturally arrives at the quantum state vector of quantum systems in the complex valued Hilbert space, its time evolution and quantum representation of a measurement apparatus of any size. Each time, when generalization is performed, there is a possibility to develop new theory giving up most simple generalizations. It is shown that a measurement apparatus is a special case of a general quantum object. An example of a measurement apparatus of an intermediate size is considered in the end.
We discuss the axiomatic basis of quantum mechanics and show that it is neither general nor consistent, since its axioms are incompatible with each other and moreover it does not incorporate the magnetic quantization as in the cyclotron motion. A general and consistent system of axioms is conjectured which incorporates also the magnetic quantization. 1 The neccessity of quantum mechanics (QM) was a result of experimental data for the energy spectrum of atoms which could not be explained in accord with the laws of classical mechanics. Nevertheless in the axiomatic basis of QM there are axioms which are not supported by the experimental results, since the whole system of axioms (1) is introduced only as a ”plausible generalization ” of the first axiom [1]: