Up to a point, the quantum theory developed in Chapter 5 was quite general. However, the systems we had in mind were non-relativistic ones consisting of a xed number of particles. In this chapter, we extend the theory to deal with systems in which the number of particles can change. There are several reasons for wanting to do this. The most obvious is that we need a method of describing high-energy scattering and decay processes in which particles can be created and destroyed. A second is that, when we try to make quantum theory consistent with special relativity, we encounter diculties (discussed in Chapter 7) that can be resolved only in this more general setting. The nal reason is that, even for systems of non-relativistic particles, the mathematics rapidly becomes intractable as the number of particles increases. A useful device for dealing with large systems is, roughly speaking, to imagine adding an extra particle, which serves as a theoretical probe of the state of the system. To put the matter another way, the method of second quantization developed in this chapter provides a means of dealing with the entire system by considering only a few particles at a time.
Up to a point, the quantum theory developed in Chapter 5 was quite general. However, the systems we had in mind were non-relativistic ones consisting of a xed number of particles. In this chapter, we extend the theory to deal with systems in which the number of particles can change. There are several reasons for wanting to do this. The most obvious is that we need a method of describing high-energy scattering and decay processes in which particles can be created and destroyed. A second is that, when we try to make quantum theory consistent with special relativity, we encounter diculties (discussed in Chapter 7) that can be resolved only in this more general setting. The nal reason is that, even for systems of non-relativistic particles, the mathematics rapidly becomes intractable as the number of particles increases. A useful device for dealing with large systems is, roughly speaking, to imagine adding an extra particle, which serves as a theoretical probe of the state of the system. To put the matter another way, the method of second quantization developed in this chapter provides a means of dealing with the entire system by considering only a few particles at a time.
Up to a point, the quantum theory developed in chapter 5 was quite general. However, the systems we had in mind were non-relativistic ones consisting of a fixed number of particles. In this chapter, we extend the theory to deal with systems in which the number of particles can change. There are several reasons for wanting to do this. The most obvious is that we need a method of describing high-energy scattering and decay processes in which particles can be created and destroyed. A second is that, when we try to make quantum theory consistent with special relativity, we encounter difficulties (discussed in chapter 7) that can be resolved only in this more general setting. The final reason is that, even for systems of non-relativistic particles, the mathematics rapidly becomes intractable as the number of particles increases. A useful device for dealing with large systems is, roughly speaking, to imagine adding an extra particle, which serves as a theoretical probe of the state of the system. To put the matter another way, the method of second quantization developed in this chapter provides a means of dealing with the entire system by considering only a few particles at a time.
Nothing can be made out of nothing. William Shakespeare , King Lear Historically, quantization of the motion of particles was developed first. The state was described by a wave function and observables by operators. When dealing with interactions between particles and fields, such as the electromagnetic field, the fields were treated classically. Classical field equations look like the quantum mechanical equations for the wave function of the field quanta. For example, the Klein–Gordon classical field equation is similar to the quantum mechanical wave equation for a relativistic spinless particle. Quantizing the fields, leading to quantum field theory, appears to be quantizing a theory that has already been quantized; hence the name “second quantization.” In reality, there is only one quantization and one quantum theory. The method of second quantization is important in the study of many-particle systems. It enables us to express many-body operators in terms of creation and annihilation operators, thus rendering calculations less cumbersome. Moreover, the method makes it possible to treat systems with a variable number of particles; that is why the method initially emerged in the context of quantum field theory. In Chapter 1 we indicated that any one-particle wave function may be expanded in a complete set of states. In this chapter, we show that products of single-particle states, when properly symmetrized, form an orthonormal basis for the expansion of the wave function of an N -particle system.
In Chapter 1, we treated the electromagnetic field as classical. Henceforth, we will want to treat it as a quantum field. In order to do so, we will first present some of the formalism of quantum field theory. This formalism is very useful in describing many-particle systems and processes in which the number of particles changes. Why this is important to a quantum description of nonlinear optics can be seen by considering a parametric amplifier of the type discussed in the last chapter. A pump field, consisting of many photons, amplifies idler and signal fields by means of a process in which a pump photon splits into two lower-energy photons, one at the idler frequency and one at the signal frequency. Therefore, what we would like to do in this chapter is to provide a discussion of some of the basics of quantum field theory that will be useful in the treatment of the quantization of the electromagnetic field. In particular, we will begin with a summary of quantum theory notation, and a discussion of many-particle Hilbert spaces. These provide the arena in which all of the action takes place. We will then move on to a treatment of the canonical quantization procedure for fields. This will allow us to develop a scattering theory for fields, which is ideally what we need. This relates the properties of a field entering a medium to those of the field leaving it, and this corresponds to what is done in an experiment.
This chapter introduces and applies the method of second quantization, a technique that underpins the formulation of quantum many-particle theories. Second quantization formalism treats systems of bosons or fermions with a fixed or variable number of particles in a unified way. The chapter reviews the key aspects of this formalism. The formalism of second quantization treats systems of bosons with a fixed or variable number of particles in a unified manner. In many physical processes, the particle number does change. Different quantum operators are expressed most naturally in different representations, which make basis changes an essential issue in quantum physics. Quantum field theory is a universal tool that has applications ranging from atomic, molecular, and particle physics to condensed matter and statistical physics as well as modern quantum chemistry. The fundamental difference between classical and quantum mechanics relates to the concept of indistinguishability of identical particles.
Up to this point, our study of quantum mechanics has concerned itself with the behaviour of particles that inhabit a Galilean spacetime. For many purposes, in atomic, molecular and condensed matter physics, this theory is quite adequate. We saw in earlier chapters, however, that our actual spacetime has a structure which is much closer to that of the Minkowski spacetime of special relativity and that more general structures must be considered when gravitational phenomena are significant. From a purely theoretical point of view, it is therefore important to formulate quantum theory in a way which is consistent with these more general spacetimes. The benefits of constructing a relativistic quantum theory actually go far beyond the aesthetic satisfaction of making our geometrical and quantummechanical reasoning compatible. For one thing, we shall discover that the relativistic theory provides a deeper understanding of spin and the distinction between fermions and bosons, which in the non-relativistic theory appear simply as facts of life that we must strive to accommodate. Also, of course, there are many situations in which relativistic effects become observable, for which nonrelativistic theory provides no explanation. The most obvious are high-energy scattering experiments, in which particles acquire kinetic energies comparable with or greater than their rest energies mc2, and the correct 4-momentum (3.34) must be used. There are, however, more subtle effects, such as the spin-orbit coupling that is essential for interpreting atomic spectra, which are also of relativistic origin.
Up to this point, our study of quantum mechanics has concerned itself with the behaviour of particles that inhabit a Galilean spacetime. For many purposes, in atomic, molecular and condensed matter physics, this theory is quite adequate. We saw in earlier chapters, however, that our actual spacetime has a structure which is much closer to that of the Minkowski spacetime of special relativity and that more general structures must be considered when gravitational phenomena are signicant. From a purely theoretical point of view, it is therefore important to formulate quantum theory in a way which is consistent with these more general spacetimes. The benets of constructing a relativistic quantum theory actually go far beyond the aesthetic satisfaction of making our geometrical and quantum-mechanical reasoning compatible. For one thing, we shall discover that the relativistic theory provides a deeper understanding of spin and the distinction between fermions and bosons, which in the non-relativistic theory appear simply as facts of life that we must strive to accommodate. Also, of course, there are many situations in which relativistic eects become observable, for which non-relativistic theory provides no explanation. The most obvious are high-energy scattering experiments, in which particles acquire kinetic energies comparable with or greater than their rest energies mc2, and the correct 4-momentum (3.33) must be used. There are, however, more subtle eects, such as the spin-orbit coupling that is essential for interpreting atomic spectra, which are also of relativistic origin.