Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

On the Intuitive Understanding of Non-Locality as Implied by Quantum Theory

David Böhm, Basil J. Hiley

Published Jan 1, 1977• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-010-1196-9_10

Related papers

On the intuitive understanding of nonlocality as implied by quantum theory

David Böhm, Basil J. Hiley

Foundations of Physics•Mar 1, 1975•178 citations

The philosophical implications of quantum non-locality

Paul Christopher Jeffries

•Jul 1, 2000•0 citations

Quantum mechanics : a half century later : papers of a Colloquium on Fifty Years of Quantum Mechanics, held at the University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, May 2-4, 1974

J. Leite Lopes, Michel Paty

Include the Observer in the Wave Function?.- On the Possible Connections between Quantum Mechanics and Gravitation.- The Quantum Probability Calculus.- Quantum Logics and Ideal Measurements of the First Kind.- A First Lecture on Quantum Mechanics.- Essay on the Development of the Statistical Theory of the Calculus of Probability.- The Quantum Mechanical One-System Formalism, Joint Probabilities and Locality.- On Propositions and Physical Systems.- Towards a Proper Quantum Theory.- On the Intuitive Understanding of Non-Locality as Implied by Quantum Theory.- Four Ideas of David Bohm on the Relationship between Quantum Mechanics and Relativity.- The Role of Quantum Mechanics in the Set-up of a Mathematical Government among Molecular Populations.- Hidden Parameters, Hidden Probabilities.- The Recent Attempts to Verify Quantum Mechanics.- Spin Correlation Measurement in Proton-Proton Scattering and Comparison with the Theories of the Local Hidden Variables.

D. Reidel Pub. Co. eBooks•Jan 1, 1977•1 citation

ON QUANTUM NON-LOCALITY AND POSSIBLE WORLDS. CRITICAL REMARKS

Witold Strawiński

Filozofia Nauki•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

How to use quantum theory locally to explain "non-local" correlations

Richard Healey

J.S. Bell's work has convinced many that correlations in violation of CHSH inequalities show that the world itself is non-local, and that there is an apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation of quantum theory and relativity. Against this consensus, this paper argues that there is no conflict between quantum theory and relativity. Quantum theory itself helps us explain such (otherwise) puzzling correlations in a way that contradicts neither Bell's intuitive locality principle nor his local causality condition. The argument depends on understanding quantum theory along pragmatist lines, and on a more general view of how that theory helps us explain. Quantum theory is compatible with Bell's intuitive locality principle and with his local causality condition not because it conforms to them, but because they are simply inapplicable to quantum theory, as so understood.

arXiv:1207.7064•Jul 27, 2012•2 citations

Beyond the Quantum - From Self-Organization to Consciousness

Ediho Lokanga

Despite the many successes of quantum mechanics, a minority within the physics community feels unease and has loudly expressed their discomfort. There are unresolved foundational questions, the measurement problem, wave particle duality, non-local effects, etc. This feeling arises when one realizes that quantum mechanics implies a number of counter-intuitive notions. This has led such a great physicist as Niels Bohr to comment, “Anyone who is not shocked by the quantum mechanics theory does not understand it!” In the same vein, Roger Penrose exclaimed: “Something new will have to come in and change the structure of quantum mechanics.”

•Sep 19, 2007•0 citations
Include the Observer in the Wave Function?.- On the Possible Connections between Quantum Mechanics and Gravitation.- The Quantum Probability Calculus.- Quantum Logics and Ideal Measurements of the First Kind.- A First Lecture on Quantum Mechanics.- Essay on the Development of the Statistical Theory of the Calculus of Probability.- The Quantum Mechanical One-System Formalism, Joint Probabilities and Locality.- On Propositions and Physical Systems.- Towards a Proper Quantum Theory.- On the Intuitive Understanding of Non-Locality as Implied by Quantum Theory.- Four Ideas of David Bohm on the Relationship between Quantum Mechanics and Relativity.- The Role of Quantum Mechanics in the Set-up of a Mathematical Government among Molecular Populations.- Hidden Parameters, Hidden Probabilities.- The Recent Attempts to Verify Quantum Mechanics.- Spin Correlation Measurement in Proton-Proton Scattering and Comparison with the Theories of the Local Hidden Variables.
J.S. Bell's work has convinced many that correlations in violation of CHSH inequalities show that the world itself is non-local, and that there is an apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation of quantum theory and relativity. Against this consensus, this paper argues that there is no conflict between quantum theory and relativity. Quantum theory itself helps us explain such (otherwise) puzzling correlations in a way that contradicts neither Bell's intuitive locality principle nor his local causality condition. The argument depends on understanding quantum theory along pragmatist lines, and on a more general view of how that theory helps us explain. Quantum theory is compatible with Bell's intuitive locality principle and with his local causality condition not because it conforms to them, but because they are simply inapplicable to quantum theory, as so understood.
Despite the many successes of quantum mechanics, a minority within the physics community feels unease and has loudly expressed their discomfort. There are unresolved foundational questions, the measurement problem, wave particle duality, non-local effects, etc. This feeling arises when one realizes that quantum mechanics implies a number of counter-intuitive notions. This has led such a great physicist as Niels Bohr to comment, “Anyone who is not shocked by the quantum mechanics theory does not understand it!” In the same vein, Roger Penrose exclaimed: “Something new will have to come in and change the structure of quantum mechanics.”