Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Quantum Cybernetics

Gerhard Grössing

Published Jan 1, 2000• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4612-1296-6

Related papers

Quantum Cybernetics

Gerhard Grössing

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Real quantum cybernetics

Gerhard Grössing

Physics Letters A•May 1, 1987•3 citations

Quantum Cybernetics Technical Committee Reports: Investigating the Role of Quantum Effects in Regulating Quantum and Classical Systems

Daoyi Dong

This article provides a summary of the operation and activities of the IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Society (SMCS) Technical Committee on Quantum Cybernetics (TC-qCyber) since its inception on 30 March 2017.

IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Magazine•Apr 1, 2020•0 citations

Wave Probabilistic Functions for Quantum Cybernetics

Miroslav Svítek

This paper presents the theory of wave probabilistic models, which in turn represents the basic principles of quantum cybernetics. The features of the theory presented here are mathematically formulated, and selected illustrative examples demonstrate possible applications of the theory. The proposed methodology represents an original approach that emerges from defined assumptions like single-valuedness, the resonance principle, etc. From these simple assumptions, a set of principles of quantum cybernetics can be derived, e.g., quantization, spin, and entanglement.

IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews)•Apr 6, 2011•7 citations

QUANTUM ENGINEERING

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jul 21, 2019•0 citations

Logical foundations of modern cybernetics

A. Szymański, Jerzy Szymański

According to Norbert Wiener, the concept of system, modelling and control, should be regarded in the frames of cybernetics. However, until now there does not exist any concept of cybernetics as a formal science, enabling us to attack the problem of control and communication in general. The authors of this paper consider two dichotomies holding between particular manifestations of control and communication under certain concepts. The first one holds between deterministic and indeterministic control and communication processes considered separately in the frames of commutative and non‐commutative theories. The latter theories are connected with cases when the measurement changes states of the observed system. Such a situation takes place in two domains: quantum measurement and psychological measurement. The authors propose a new look at cybernetics as a Birkhoff logic or an orthomodular lattice as well as the generalized probability theory constructed on it, which could yield a unified description of classical—quantum—and psycho‐sociological control and communication processes. Such an attempt, as a practical result, lays the foundations for noncommutative psychological measurement theory which should be constructed in the future.

World Futures•Jun 1, 1995•1 citation
This paper presents the theory of wave probabilistic models, which in turn represents the basic principles of quantum cybernetics. The features of the theory presented here are mathematically formulated, and selected illustrative examples demonstrate possible applications of the theory. The proposed methodology represents an original approach that emerges from defined assumptions like single-valuedness, the resonance principle, etc. From these simple assumptions, a set of principles of quantum cybernetics can be derived, e.g., quantization, spin, and entanglement.
According to Norbert Wiener, the concept of system, modelling and control, should be regarded in the frames of cybernetics. However, until now there does not exist any concept of cybernetics as a formal science, enabling us to attack the problem of control and communication in general. The authors of this paper consider two dichotomies holding between particular manifestations of control and communication under certain concepts. The first one holds between deterministic and indeterministic control and communication processes considered separately in the frames of commutative and non‐commutative theories. The latter theories are connected with cases when the measurement changes states of the observed system. Such a situation takes place in two domains: quantum measurement and psychological measurement. The authors propose a new look at cybernetics as a Birkhoff logic or an orthomodular lattice as well as the generalized probability theory constructed on it, which could yield a unified description of classical—quantum—and psycho‐sociological control and communication processes. Such an attempt, as a practical result, lays the foundations for noncommutative psychological measurement theory which should be constructed in the future.