Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Princeton University Press eBooks

From Particles to Quanta

Published Jul 21, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2307/j.ctv131bvbv.5

Related papers

The Principle of equal Probabilities of Quantum States

M. Psimopoulos, Emilie Dafflon

The statistical problem of the distribution of $s$ quanta of equal energy $ε_0$ and total energy $E$ among $N$ distinguishable particles is resolved using the conventional theory based on Boltzmann's principle of equal probabilities of configurations of particles distributed among energy levels and the concept of average state. In particular, the probability that a particle is in the \k{appa}-th energy level i.e. contains \k{appa} quanta, is given by $p(κ)=\displaystyle \frac{\displaystyle \binom{N+s-κ-2}{N-2}}{\displaystyle \binom{N+s-1}{N-1}} \;\;\; ; \;\;\; κ= 0, 1, 2, \cdots, s$ In this context, the special case ($N=4$, $s=4$) presented indicates that the alternative concept of most probable state is not valid for finite values of $s$ and $N$. In the present article we derive alternatively $p(κ)$ by distributing $s$ quanta over $N$ particles and by introducing a new principle of equal probability of quantum states, where the quanta are indistinguishable in agreement with the Bose statistics. Therefore, the analysis of the two approaches presented in this paper highlights the equivalence of quantum theory with classical statistical mechanics for the present system. At the limit $ε_{o} \rightarrow 0 $; $s \rightarrow \infty $; $s ε_{o} = E \sim$ fixed, where the energy of the particles becomes continuous, $p(κ)$ transforms to the Boltzmann law $P(ε) = \displaystyle \frac{1}{\langle ε\rangle}e^{-\fracε{\langle ε\rangle}} \;\;\; ; \;\;\; 0\leq ε< +\infty$ where $\langle ε\rangle = E/N$. Hence, the classical principle of equal a priori probabilities for the energy of the particles leading to the above law, is justified here by quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2111.09246•Nov 17, 2021•0 citations

From Waves to Particles

Essential textbooks in physics•Nov 1, 2018•0 citations

On breaking quanta

Прохоров Лев Васильевич

The nature of particles, wave functions, and the possibility of breaking quanta are discussed.

Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters•Jan 1, 2009•1 citation

No classical particle limit for massless quanta

Riccardo Falcone, Simon Fuchs

We investigate whether relativistic massless classical particles may emerge as the classical limit of massless quanta. To address this question independently of any specific dynamics, environment, or pointer basis, we develop an axiomatic and purely kinematical framework for the coarse-graining approach. In this formulation, a candidate classical phase space is taken as the outcome space of a POVM subject only to minimal classicality and covariance under the relevant spacetime symmetry group. Applying this framework to the Poincaré group, we prove a no-go theorem for massless particles: the covariance requirement is incompatible with the operational conditions for classicality. The theorem leaves open field-like limits of massless quanta, for example the emergence of electromagnetic or gravitational fields, while ruling out classical massless particles, such as classical photons or gravitons.

quant-pharXiv:2606.14632•Jun 15, 2026•0 citations

From Data to Quanta

Slobodan Perović

University of Chicago Press eBooks•Jan 1, 2021•4 citations

Particles and Waves

Giulio Armando Ottonello

Springer geochemistry•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations
The statistical problem of the distribution of sss quanta of equal energy ε0ε_0ε0​ and total energy EEE among NNN distinguishable particles is resolved using the conventional theory based on Boltzmann's principle of equal probabilities of configurations of particles distributed among energy levels and the concept of average state. In particular, the probability that a particle is in the \k{appa}-th energy level i.e. contains \k{appa} quanta, is given by p(κ)=(N+s−κ−2N−2)(N+s−1N−1)      ;      κ=0,1,2,⋯ ,sp(κ)=\displaystyle \frac{\displaystyle \binom{N+s-κ-2}{N-2}}{\displaystyle \binom{N+s-1}{N-1}} \;\;\; ; \;\;\; κ= 0, 1, 2, \cdots, sp(κ)=(N−1N+s−1​)(N−2N+s−κ−2​)​;κ=0,1,2,⋯,s In this context, the special case (N=4N=4N=4, s=4s=4s=4) presented indicates that the alternative concept of most probable state is not valid for finite values of sss and NNN. In the present article we derive alternatively p(κ)p(κ)p(κ) by distributing sss quanta over NNN particles and by introducing a new principle of equal probability of quantum states, where the quanta are indistinguishable in agreement with the Bose statistics. Therefore, the analysis of the two approaches presented in this paper highlights the equivalence of quantum theory with classical statistical mechanics for the present system. At the limit $ε_{o} \rightarrow 0 $; $s \rightarrow \infty $; sεo=E∼s ε_{o} = E \simsεo​=E∼ fixed, where the energy of the particles becomes continuous, p(κ)p(κ)p(κ) transforms to the Boltzmann law P(ε)=1⟨ε⟩e−ε⟨ε⟩      ;      0≤ε<+∞P(ε) = \displaystyle \frac{1}{\langle ε\rangle}e^{-\fracε{\langle ε\rangle}} \;\;\; ; \;\;\; 0\leq ε< +\inftyP(ε)=⟨ε⟩1​e−⟨ε⟩ε​;0≤ε<+∞ where ⟨ε⟩=E/N\langle ε\rangle = E/N⟨ε⟩=E/N. Hence, the classical principle of equal a priori probabilities for the energy of the particles leading to the above law, is justified here by quantum mechanics.
We investigate whether relativistic massless classical particles may emerge as the classical limit of massless quanta. To address this question independently of any specific dynamics, environment, or pointer basis, we develop an axiomatic and purely kinematical framework for the coarse-graining approach. In this formulation, a candidate classical phase space is taken as the outcome space of a POVM subject only to minimal classicality and covariance under the relevant spacetime symmetry group. Applying this framework to the Poincaré group, we prove a no-go theorem for massless particles: the covariance requirement is incompatible with the operational conditions for classicality. The theorem leaves open field-like limits of massless quanta, for example the emergence of electromagnetic or gravitational fields, while ruling out classical massless particles, such as classical photons or gravitons.