Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Introduction

Mark M. Wilde

Published Nov 2, 2016• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Before quantum information became an established discipline, John R. Pierce issued the following quip at the end of his 1973 retrospective article on the history of information theory (Pierce, 1973): “I think that I have never met a physicist who understood information theory. I wish that physicists would stop talking about reformulating information theory and would give us a general expression for the capacity of a channel with quantum effects taken into account rather than a number of special cases.” Since the publication of Pierce's article, we have learned much more about quantum mechanics and information theory than he might have imagined at the time, but we have also realized that there is much more to discover. In spite of all that we have learned, we still unfortunately have not been able to address Pierce's concern in the above quote in full generality. The most basic question that we could ask in quantum Shannon theory (and the one with which Pierce was concerned) is how much classical information a sender can transmit to a receiver by exploiting a quantum channel. We have determined many special cases of quantum channels for which we do know their classical capacities, but we also now know that this most basic question is still wide open in the general case. What Pierce might not have imagined at the time is that a quantum channel has a much larger variety of capacities than does a classical channel. For example, we might wish to determine the classical capacity of a quantum channel assisted by entanglement shared between the sender and receiver. We have seen that in the simplest of cases, such as the noiseless qubit channel, shared entanglement boosts the classical capacity up to two bits, and we now refer to this phenomenon as the super-dense coding effect (see Chapter 6). Interestingly, the entanglementassisted capacity of a quantum channel is one of the few scenarios where we can claim to have a complete understanding of the channel's transmission capabilities. From the results regarding the entanglement-assisted capacity, we have learned that shared entanglement is often a “friend” because it tends to simplify results in both quantum Shannon theory and other subfields of quantum information science.

DOI
10.1017/9781316809976.023

Related papers

In information processing, as in physics, our classical world view provides an incomplete approximation to an underlying quantum reality. Quantum effects like interference and entanglement play no direct role in conventional information processing, but they can—in principle now, but probably eventually in practice—be harnessed to break codes, create unbreakable codes, and speed up otherwise intractable computations.

Charles H. Bennett, David Peter Divincenzo

Information and computation theory have undergone a spurt of new growth, and a renewal of their historic connection to basic physics, as they have expanded to treat the intact transmission and processing of quantum states, and the interaction of such 'quantum information' with traditional forms of information. We may wonder why this did not happen earlier, as quantum principles have long been accepted as fundamental to all of physics. Perhaps the founders of information and computation theory, such as Shannon, Turing and von Neumann, were too accustomed to thinking of information processing in macroscopic terms, not yet having before them the powerful examples of the genetic code and ever-shrinking microelectronics. Be that as it may, information until recently has largely been thought of in classical terms, with quantum mechanics playing a supporting role in the design of the equipment to process it, and setting limits on the rate at which it could be sent through certain channels. Now we know that a fully quantum theory of information and information processing offers, among other benefits, a brand of cryptography whose security rests on fundamental physics, and a reasonable hope of constructing quan- tum computers that could dramatically speed up the solution of certain mathematical problems. These benefits depend on distinc- tively quantum properties such as uncertainty, interference and entanglement. At a more fundamental level, it has become clear that an information theory based on quantum principles extends and completes classical information theory, just as complex numbers extend and complete the reals. Besides quantum generalizations of classical notions such as sources, channels and codes, the new theory includes two complementary, quantifiable kinds of information— classical information and quantum entanglement. Classical infor- mation can be copied at will, but can only be transmitted forward in time, to a receiver in the sender's forward light cone. Entanglement in contrast, cannot be copied, but can connect any two points in space-time. Conventional data processing operations destroy entanglement, but quantum operations can create it and use it for various purposes, such as speeding up certain classical computa- tions and assisting in the transmission of classical information or intact quantum states. Part of the new quantum information theory is the qualitative and quantitative study of entanglement, and its interactions with classical information. Any means, such as an optical fibre, of delivering quantum systems more or less intact from one place to another, may be viewed as a quantum channel. Unlike classical channels, which are well characterized by a single capacity, quantum channels have several distinct capacities, depending on what one is trying to use them for, and what auxiliary resources are brought into play. New effects involving quantum information continue to be discovered, not only in the traditional areas of computation, channel capacity, and cryptography, but in areas such as commu- nication complexity and game theory.

•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Three Unit Quantum Protocols

Mark M. Wilde

This chapter begins our first exciting application of the postulates of the quantum theory to quantum communication. We study the fundamental, unit quantum communication protocols. These protocols involve a single sender Alice and a single receiver Bob. The protocols are ideal and noiseless because we assume that Alice and Bob can exploit perfect classical communication, perfect quantum communication, and perfect entanglement. At the end of this chapter, we suggest how to incorporate imperfections into these protocols for later study. Alice and Bob may wish to perform one of several quantum informationprocessing tasks, such as the transmission of classical information, quantum information, or entanglement. Several fundamental protocols make use of these resources: 1. We will see that noiseless entanglement is an important resource in quantum Shannon theory because it enables Alice and Bob to perform other protocols that are not possible with classical resources only. We will present a simple, idealized protocol for generating entanglement, named entanglement distribution . 2. Alice may wish to communicate classical information to Bob. A trivial method, named elementary coding , is a simple way of doing so and we discuss it briefly. 3. A more interesting technique for transmitting classical information is superdense coding . It exploits a noiseless qubit channel and shared entanglement to transmit more classical information than would be possible with a noiseless qubit channel alone. 4. Finally, Alice may wish to transmit quantum information to Bob. A trivial method for her to do so is to exploit a noiseless qubit channel. However, it is useful to have other ways for transmitting quantum information because such a resource is difficult to engineer in practice. An alternative, surprising method for transmitting quantum information is quantum teleportation . The teleportation protocol exploits classical communication and shared entanglement to transmit quantum information. Each of these protocols is a fundamental unit protocol and provides a foundation for asking further questions in quantum Shannon theory. In fact, the discovery of these latter two protocols was the stimulus for much of the original research in quantum Shannon theory. One could take each of these protocols and ask about its performance if one or more of the resources involved is noisy rather than noiseless. Later chapters of this book explore many of these possibilities.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 2, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Information Theory

Mark M. Wilde

Finally, here is a modern, self-contained text on quantum information theory suitable for graduate-level courses. Developing the subject 'from the ground up' it covers classical results as well as major advances of the past decade. Beginning with an extensive overview of classical information theory suitable for the non-expert, the author then turns his attention to quantum mechanics for quantum information theory, and the important protocols of teleportation, super-dense coding and entanglement distribution. He develops all of the tools necessary for understanding important results in quantum information theory, including capacity theorems for classical, entanglement-assisted, private and quantum communication. The book also covers important recent developments such as superadditivity of private, coherent and Holevo information, and the superactivation of quantum capacity. This book will be warmly welcomed by the upcoming generation of quantum information theorists and the already established community of classical information theorists.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 18, 2013•1,138 citations

Trade-off capacities of the quantum Hadamard channels

Kamil Brádler, Patrick M. Hayden, Dave Touchette +1 more

Coding theorems in quantum Shannon theory express the ultimate rates at which a sender can transmit information over a noisy quantum channel. More often than not, the known formulas expressing these transmission rates are intractable, requiring an optimization over an infinite number of uses of the channel. Researchers have rarely found quantum channels with a tractable classical or quantum capacity, but when such a finding occurs, it demonstrates a complete understanding of that channel's capabilities for transmitting classical or quantum information. Here we show that the three-dimensional capacity region for entanglement-assisted transmission of classical and quantum information is tractable for the Hadamard class of channels. Examples of Hadamard channels include generalized dephasing channels, cloning channels, and the Unruh channel. The generalized dephasing channels and the cloning channels are natural processes that occur in quantum systems through the loss of quantum coherence or stimulated emission, respectively. The Unruh channel is a noisy process that occurs in relativistic quantum information theory as a result of the Unruh effect and bears a strong relationship to the cloning channels. We give exact formulas for the entanglement-assisted classical and quantum communication capacity regions of these channels. The coding strategy for each of these examples is superior to a na\"{\i}ve time-sharing strategy, and we introduce a measure to determine this improvement.

arXiv:1001.1732•Physical Review A•Jun 14, 2010•79 citations

Coding theorems for quantum communication channels

Alexander Semenovich Holevo

The more than thirty years old issue of the information capacity of quantum communication channels was dramatically clarified during when a number of direct quantum coding theorems were discovered. To a considerable extent this progress is due to an interplay between the quantum communication theory and quantum information ideas related to more recent development in quantum computing. It is remarkable, however, that many probabilistic tools underlying the treatment of the quantum case have their roots, and in some cases direct prototypes, in the classical Shannon theory.

arXiv:quant-ph/9708046•IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Nov 27, 2002•17 citations

Entanglement Concentration

Mark M. Wilde

Entanglement is one of the most useful resources in quantum information processing. If a sender and receiver share noiseless entanglement in the form of maximally entangled states, then Chapter 6 showed how they can teleport quantum bits between each other with the help of classical communication, or they can double the capacity of a noiseless qubit channel for transmitting classical information. We will see further applications in Chapter 20 where they can exploit noiseless entanglement to assist in the transmission of classical or quantum data over a noisy quantum channel. Given the utility of maximal entanglement, a reasonable question is to ask what a sender and receiver can accomplish if they share pure entangled states that are not maximally entangled. In the quantum Shannon-theoretic setting, we make the further assumption that the sender and receiver can share many copies of these pure entangled states. We find out in this chapter that they can “concentrate” these non-maximally entangled states to maximally entangled ebits, and the optimal rate at which they can do so in the asymptotic limit is equal to the “entropy of entanglement” (the von Neumann entropy of half of one copy of the original state). Entanglement concentration is thus another fundamental task in noiseless quantum Shannon theory, and it gives a different operational interpretation to the von Neumann entropy. Entanglement concentration is perhaps complementary to Schumacher compression in the sense that it gives a firm quantum information-theoretic interpretation of the term “ebit” (just as Schumacher compression did for the term “qubit”), and it plays a part in demonstrating how the entropy of entanglement is the unique measure of entanglement for pure bipartite states.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 18, 2013•0 citations
Before quantum information became an established discipline, John R. Pierce issued the following quip at the end of his 1973 retrospective article on the history of information theory (Pierce, 1973): “I think that I have never met a physicist who understood information theory. I wish that physicists would stop talking about reformulating information theory and would give us a general expression for the capacity of a channel with quantum effects taken into account rather than a number of special cases.” Since the publication of Pierce's article, we have learned much more about quantum mechanics and information theory than he might have imagined at the time, but we have also realized that there is much more to discover. In spite of all that we have learned, we still unfortunately have not been able to address Pierce's concern in the above quote in full generality. The most basic question that we could ask in quantum Shannon theory (and the one with which Pierce was concerned) is how much classical information a sender can transmit to a receiver by exploiting a quantum channel. We have determined many special cases of quantum channels for which we do know their classical capacities, but we also now know that this most basic question is still wide open in the general case. What Pierce might not have imagined at the time is that a quantum channel has a much larger variety of capacities than does a classical channel. For example, we might wish to determine the classical capacity of a quantum channel assisted by entanglement shared between the sender and receiver. We have seen that in the simplest of cases, such as the noiseless qubit channel, shared entanglement boosts the classical capacity up to two bits, and we now refer to this phenomenon as the super-dense coding effect (see Chapter 6). Interestingly, the entanglementassisted capacity of a quantum channel is one of the few scenarios where we can claim to have a complete understanding of the channel's transmission capabilities. From the results regarding the entanglement-assisted capacity, we have learned that shared entanglement is often a “friend” because it tends to simplify results in both quantum Shannon theory and other subfields of quantum information science.
Information and computation theory have undergone a spurt of new growth, and a renewal of their historic connection to basic physics, as they have expanded to treat the intact transmission and processing of quantum states, and the interaction of such 'quantum information' with traditional forms of information. We may wonder why this did not happen earlier, as quantum principles have long been accepted as fundamental to all of physics. Perhaps the founders of information and computation theory, such as Shannon, Turing and von Neumann, were too accustomed to thinking of information processing in macroscopic terms, not yet having before them the powerful examples of the genetic code and ever-shrinking microelectronics. Be that as it may, information until recently has largely been thought of in classical terms, with quantum mechanics playing a supporting role in the design of the equipment to process it, and setting limits on the rate at which it could be sent through certain channels. Now we know that a fully quantum theory of information and information processing offers, among other benefits, a brand of cryptography whose security rests on fundamental physics, and a reasonable hope of constructing quan- tum computers that could dramatically speed up the solution of certain mathematical problems. These benefits depend on distinc- tively quantum properties such as uncertainty, interference and entanglement. At a more fundamental level, it has become clear that an information theory based on quantum principles extends and completes classical information theory, just as complex numbers extend and complete the reals. Besides quantum generalizations of classical notions such as sources, channels and codes, the new theory includes two complementary, quantifiable kinds of information— classical information and quantum entanglement. Classical infor- mation can be copied at will, but can only be transmitted forward in time, to a receiver in the sender's forward light cone. Entanglement in contrast, cannot be copied, but can connect any two points in space-time. Conventional data processing operations destroy entanglement, but quantum operations can create it and use it for various purposes, such as speeding up certain classical computa- tions and assisting in the transmission of classical information or intact quantum states. Part of the new quantum information theory is the qualitative and quantitative study of entanglement, and its interactions with classical information. Any means, such as an optical fibre, of delivering quantum systems more or less intact from one place to another, may be viewed as a quantum channel. Unlike classical channels, which are well characterized by a single capacity, quantum channels have several distinct capacities, depending on what one is trying to use them for, and what auxiliary resources are brought into play. New effects involving quantum information continue to be discovered, not only in the traditional areas of computation, channel capacity, and cryptography, but in areas such as commu- nication complexity and game theory.
This chapter begins our first exciting application of the postulates of the quantum theory to quantum communication. We study the fundamental, unit quantum communication protocols. These protocols involve a single sender Alice and a single receiver Bob. The protocols are ideal and noiseless because we assume that Alice and Bob can exploit perfect classical communication, perfect quantum communication, and perfect entanglement. At the end of this chapter, we suggest how to incorporate imperfections into these protocols for later study. Alice and Bob may wish to perform one of several quantum informationprocessing tasks, such as the transmission of classical information, quantum information, or entanglement. Several fundamental protocols make use of these resources: 1. We will see that noiseless entanglement is an important resource in quantum Shannon theory because it enables Alice and Bob to perform other protocols that are not possible with classical resources only. We will present a simple, idealized protocol for generating entanglement, named entanglement distribution . 2. Alice may wish to communicate classical information to Bob. A trivial method, named elementary coding , is a simple way of doing so and we discuss it briefly. 3. A more interesting technique for transmitting classical information is superdense coding . It exploits a noiseless qubit channel and shared entanglement to transmit more classical information than would be possible with a noiseless qubit channel alone. 4. Finally, Alice may wish to transmit quantum information to Bob. A trivial method for her to do so is to exploit a noiseless qubit channel. However, it is useful to have other ways for transmitting quantum information because such a resource is difficult to engineer in practice. An alternative, surprising method for transmitting quantum information is quantum teleportation . The teleportation protocol exploits classical communication and shared entanglement to transmit quantum information. Each of these protocols is a fundamental unit protocol and provides a foundation for asking further questions in quantum Shannon theory. In fact, the discovery of these latter two protocols was the stimulus for much of the original research in quantum Shannon theory. One could take each of these protocols and ask about its performance if one or more of the resources involved is noisy rather than noiseless. Later chapters of this book explore many of these possibilities.
Finally, here is a modern, self-contained text on quantum information theory suitable for graduate-level courses. Developing the subject 'from the ground up' it covers classical results as well as major advances of the past decade. Beginning with an extensive overview of classical information theory suitable for the non-expert, the author then turns his attention to quantum mechanics for quantum information theory, and the important protocols of teleportation, super-dense coding and entanglement distribution. He develops all of the tools necessary for understanding important results in quantum information theory, including capacity theorems for classical, entanglement-assisted, private and quantum communication. The book also covers important recent developments such as superadditivity of private, coherent and Holevo information, and the superactivation of quantum capacity. This book will be warmly welcomed by the upcoming generation of quantum information theorists and the already established community of classical information theorists.
Coding theorems in quantum Shannon theory express the ultimate rates at which a sender can transmit information over a noisy quantum channel. More often than not, the known formulas expressing these transmission rates are intractable, requiring an optimization over an infinite number of uses of the channel. Researchers have rarely found quantum channels with a tractable classical or quantum capacity, but when such a finding occurs, it demonstrates a complete understanding of that channel's capabilities for transmitting classical or quantum information. Here we show that the three-dimensional capacity region for entanglement-assisted transmission of classical and quantum information is tractable for the Hadamard class of channels. Examples of Hadamard channels include generalized dephasing channels, cloning channels, and the Unruh channel. The generalized dephasing channels and the cloning channels are natural processes that occur in quantum systems through the loss of quantum coherence or stimulated emission, respectively. The Unruh channel is a noisy process that occurs in relativistic quantum information theory as a result of the Unruh effect and bears a strong relationship to the cloning channels. We give exact formulas for the entanglement-assisted classical and quantum communication capacity regions of these channels. The coding strategy for each of these examples is superior to a na\"{\i}ve time-sharing strategy, and we introduce a measure to determine this improvement.
The more than thirty years old issue of the information capacity of quantum communication channels was dramatically clarified during when a number of direct quantum coding theorems were discovered. To a considerable extent this progress is due to an interplay between the quantum communication theory and quantum information ideas related to more recent development in quantum computing. It is remarkable, however, that many probabilistic tools underlying the treatment of the quantum case have their roots, and in some cases direct prototypes, in the classical Shannon theory.
Entanglement is one of the most useful resources in quantum information processing. If a sender and receiver share noiseless entanglement in the form of maximally entangled states, then Chapter 6 showed how they can teleport quantum bits between each other with the help of classical communication, or they can double the capacity of a noiseless qubit channel for transmitting classical information. We will see further applications in Chapter 20 where they can exploit noiseless entanglement to assist in the transmission of classical or quantum data over a noisy quantum channel. Given the utility of maximal entanglement, a reasonable question is to ask what a sender and receiver can accomplish if they share pure entangled states that are not maximally entangled. In the quantum Shannon-theoretic setting, we make the further assumption that the sender and receiver can share many copies of these pure entangled states. We find out in this chapter that they can “concentrate” these non-maximally entangled states to maximally entangled ebits, and the optimal rate at which they can do so in the asymptotic limit is equal to the “entropy of entanglement” (the von Neumann entropy of half of one copy of the original state). Entanglement concentration is thus another fundamental task in noiseless quantum Shannon theory, and it gives a different operational interpretation to the von Neumann entropy. Entanglement concentration is perhaps complementary to Schumacher compression in the sense that it gives a firm quantum information-theoretic interpretation of the term “ebit” (just as Schumacher compression did for the term “qubit”), and it plays a part in demonstrating how the entropy of entanglement is the unique measure of entanglement for pure bipartite states.