Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Quantum Imaging

Mikhail I. Kolobov

Published Jan 1, 2007• 111 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/0-387-33988-4

Related papers

Fundamental Limits of Classical and Quantum Imaging

Carlos A. Pérez-Delgado, Mark E. Pearce, Pieter Kok

Quantum imaging promises increased imaging performance over classical protocols. However, there are a number of aspects of quantum imaging that are not well understood. In particular, it has been unknown so far how to compare classical and quantum imaging procedures. Here, we consider classical and quantum imaging in a single theoretical framework and present general fundamental limits on the resolution and the deposition rate for classical and quantum imaging. The resolution can be estimated from the image itself. We present a utility function that allows us to compare imaging protocols in a wide range of applications.

arXiv:1204.5209•Physical Review Letters•Sep 18, 2012•45 citations

Quantum Imaging

Ray LaPierre

Undergraduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Cram\'er-Rao Bounds for Classical and Quantum Imaging

Carlos A. Pérez-Delgado, Mark E. Pearce, Pieter Kok

Quantum imaging promises increased imaging performance over classical protocols. However, there are a number of aspects of quantum imaging that are not well understood. In particular, it has so far been unknown how to compare classical and quantum imaging procedures. Here, we consider classical and quantum imaging in a single theoretical framework and present the fundamental limit on the resolution in the form of Cram\'er-Rao bounds for classical and quantum imaging. The resolution can be estimated from the image itself. We present a utility function that allows us to compare imaging protocols in a wide range of applications.

•Apr 23, 2012•0 citations

Quantum imaging and sensing

Edoardo Charbon A

Computational Optical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Sciences•Mar 5, 2026•0 citations

Quantum aspects of imaging

A. Gatti

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Quantum imaging: enhanced image formation using quantum states of light

Robert W. Boyd, Kam Wai Clifford Chan, Anand K. Jha +4 more

We review recent research in the field of quantum imaging. Quantum imaging deals with the formation of images that possess higher resolution or better signal-to-noise characteristics than conventional images by making use of the coherence properties of quantum light fields. Quantum imaging also deals with indirect imaging methods such as ghost imaging, in which image information is conveyed not by a single light field but by the correlations between two separate light fields. In this contribution we concentrate primarily on recent results in the area of ghost imaging.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Apr 30, 2009•6 citations
Quantum imaging promises increased imaging performance over classical protocols. However, there are a number of aspects of quantum imaging that are not well understood. In particular, it has been unknown so far how to compare classical and quantum imaging procedures. Here, we consider classical and quantum imaging in a single theoretical framework and present general fundamental limits on the resolution and the deposition rate for classical and quantum imaging. The resolution can be estimated from the image itself. We present a utility function that allows us to compare imaging protocols in a wide range of applications.
Quantum imaging promises increased imaging performance over classical protocols. However, there are a number of aspects of quantum imaging that are not well understood. In particular, it has so far been unknown how to compare classical and quantum imaging procedures. Here, we consider classical and quantum imaging in a single theoretical framework and present the fundamental limit on the resolution in the form of Cram\'er-Rao bounds for classical and quantum imaging. The resolution can be estimated from the image itself. We present a utility function that allows us to compare imaging protocols in a wide range of applications.
We review recent research in the field of quantum imaging. Quantum imaging deals with the formation of images that possess higher resolution or better signal-to-noise characteristics than conventional images by making use of the coherence properties of quantum light fields. Quantum imaging also deals with indirect imaging methods such as ghost imaging, in which image information is conveyed not by a single light field but by the correlations between two separate light fields. In this contribution we concentrate primarily on recent results in the area of ghost imaging.