Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Elsevier eBooks

Quantum Mechanics of Some Simple Systems

John P. Lowe, Kirk A. Peterson

Published Jan 1, 2006• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/b978-012457551-6/50004-4

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics of Some Simple Systems

S. M. Blinder

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics of Simple Systems

Andreas Hofmann

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Quantum mechanics of some simple system

S. M. Blinder

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2021•1 citation

A Royal Road to Quantum Mechanics (or Thereabouts)

Alexander Wilce

This paper fails to derive quantum mechanics from a few simple postulates. But it gets very close --- and it does so without much exertion. More exactly, I obtain a representation of finite-dimensional probabilistic systems in terms of euclidean Jordan algebras, in a strikingly easy way, from simple assumptions. This provides a framework within which real, complex and quaternionic QM can play happily together, and allows some --- but not too much --- room for more exotic alternatives.

•Jun 29, 2016•0 citations

QUANTUM MECHANICS OF SOME SIMPLE SYSTEMS

John P. Lowe

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1978•0 citations

A microscopic derivation of the quantum measurement postulates

Vyacheslav Lysov, Yasha Neiman

In the mid-19th century, both the laws of mechanics and thermodynamics were known, and both appeared fundamental. This was changed by Boltzmann and Gibbs, who showed that thermodynamics can be *derived*, by applying mechanics to very large systems, and making simple statistical assumptions about their behavior. Similarly, when Quantum Mechanics (QM) was first discovered, it appeared to require two sets of postulates: one about the deterministic evolution of wavefunctions, and another about the probabilistic measurement process. Here again, the latter is derivable from the former: by applying unitary evolution to large systems (apparatuses, observers and environment), and making simple assumptions about their behavior, one can derive all the features of quantum measurement. We set out to demonstrate this claim, using a simple and explicit model of a quantum experiment, which we hope will be clear and compelling to the average physicist.

arXiv:2107.00803•Jul 2, 2021•0 citations
In the mid-19th century, both the laws of mechanics and thermodynamics were known, and both appeared fundamental. This was changed by Boltzmann and Gibbs, who showed that thermodynamics can be *derived*, by applying mechanics to very large systems, and making simple statistical assumptions about their behavior. Similarly, when Quantum Mechanics (QM) was first discovered, it appeared to require two sets of postulates: one about the deterministic evolution of wavefunctions, and another about the probabilistic measurement process. Here again, the latter is derivable from the former: by applying unitary evolution to large systems (apparatuses, observers and environment), and making simple assumptions about their behavior, one can derive all the features of quantum measurement. We set out to demonstrate this claim, using a simple and explicit model of a quantum experiment, which we hope will be clear and compelling to the average physicist.