Reality, locality, and “free will”

Stanley Gudder

Adrian Kent

Henry Pierce Stapp

Boris V. Yakovlev, Liudmila V. Nikiforova

In modern physical theories, when modeling fundamental structures of reality, the relational concept of space and time is not sufficiently taken into account. In modern physical theories, the relational concept of space and time is not sufficiently taken into account when modeling fundamental structures of reality. A priori, the concepts of space and time are introduced, which leads to contradiction. The purpose of the present work is to simulate the localization and motion of a free particle taking into account the relational concept of space and time. When modeling the localization and motion of a free particle, it is shown that the use of the superposition principle, namely, the overlay of subsystems, allows you to take into account the relational concept of space and time. For this, Minkowski space is generalized. State space is introduced - homogeneous space of possible subsystems. From the overlay of these subsystems, Minkowsky space is manifested, taking into account the presence of particles. It is shown that homogeneity and isotropy of space and homogeneity of time follow from homogeneity of space of possible subsystems. For the particle, a non-swinging de Broglie wave packet is obtained.

Narayanankutty Karuppath, Achuthan Panajikunnath

Indeterminacy, entanglement, non-locality and objective reality are the broad areas in quantum physics that have some bearing to the reality of consciousness. If consciousness has a tangible effect on matter, it should not be considered as taboo to talk about it in physics. We postulate free-will to be the characteristic feature of consciousness, the existence of which can be mathematically modeled and studied. In this paper we argue that, in the light of present developments, both quantum mechanics and cosmology point to a Consciousness Controlled Cosmos.

SEERAVERSE Research Group, Seera Tajima, Tajima

Shared Reality as the Synchronization of Realized Sectors examines how shared reality may be understood once observer-dependence is taken seriously. Rather than treating objectivity as a world free of observers, this paper proposes that shared reality may be understood as the maintained overlap and re-synchronization of multiple observer-dependent realized sectors. On this view, objectivity is not the absence of perspective, but the sustained coherence of realized sectors across observer networks. The paper argues that overlap does not require identical content. What is shared is not every local feature, but enough recoverable compatibility of structure for reference, correction, and coordinated action to remain possible. Shared reality is therefore not a pre-given container surrounding observers, but an ongoing synchronization achievement, sustained through language, record, measurement, science, law, and other institutional forms. Within this framework, sovereign observers are not opposed to shared reality, but are necessary to it. A synchronizable world requires observers who can sustain local depth without collapsing into conformity or hardening into closure. The paper also considers the role of artificial systems in the synchronization layer, arguing that they function less as independent sources of objectivity than as amplifiers, mediators, and stabilizers of inter-observer coordination. At the same time, the paper explicitly limits its scope: it offers a structural account of shareability, not an exhaustive empirical sociology of coordination. This paper is the seventh in the Selection Geometry / Intent Physics sequence. Paper VI asked how reality formation becomes lived from the observer side. Paper VII asks how lived realities remain shareable. It therefore serves as the bridge from observer-experience to the synchronization layer of science, institutions, and civilization-scale coherence.