Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Russian Physics Journal

Second approximation of the generalized WKBJ method. III

Н. И. Жирнов

Published Nov 1, 1968• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00816071

Related papers

New approaches to the generalized WKB approximation. III

N. I. Zhlrnov, A.A. Sokolov

Russian Physics Journal•Oct 1, 1974•0 citations

The generalized WKB method in the three-dimensional case. III

Н. И. Жирнов, F. B. Nurlygayanov

Russian Physics Journal•Mar 1, 1976•0 citations

The quantum pendulum in the WKBJ approximation

Roop Narain Kesarwani, Y. P. Varshni

Eigenvalues are determined for the plane pendulum problem by the WKBJ method in one- and four-term approximations, and the results are compared. It is found that at high quantum numbers, the four-term WKBJ approximation can yield eigenvalues of eight-significant-figure accuracy, but for low quantum numbers the results continue to be poor.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 1982•7 citations

The generalized WKB method in the three-dimensional case. II

Н. И. Жирнов, F. B. Nurlygayanov

Russian Physics Journal•Mar 1, 1976•0 citations

Classical particles with spin. I. The WKBJ approximation

John J. Stachel, Jerzy F Plebanski

This is the first of a series of papers developing the classical theory of a spinning particle. The equations of motion will be derived from a Lagrangian, and solutions for the classical trajectory and spin precession in external fields will be given. In this paper an abstract spin vector is introduced to characterize the spin of a classical particle. Lagrangians for the classical trajectories and for the motion of the abstract spin vector are derived from corresponding quantum-mechanical Lagrangians by the WKBJ approximation method for nonrelativistic and relativistic particles. The equations of motion for the trajectory and the abstract spin vector following from the extremalization of these Lagrangians are given. The equations of motion for the precession in an external electromagnetic field of the spin vector (or tensor) in space–time is derived from the equations of motion for the abstract spin vector. In the relativistic case, they are equivalent to the Bargmann–Michel–Telegdi equations [Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 435 (1959)]. The relationship between the ensemble and single-particle points of view is also elucidated.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1977•13 citations

The use of the Airy functions in a potential barrier problem

Bertha Swirles Jeffreys

ABSTRACT The exact solution for a trapezoidal potential barrier is given in terms of Airy functions and trigonometrical functions. Numerical values are found for the ratio of the amplitudes of the transmitted and reflected waves. These are compared with those given by the WKBJ approximation.

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society•Apr 1, 1956•8 citations
This is the first of a series of papers developing the classical theory of a spinning particle. The equations of motion will be derived from a Lagrangian, and solutions for the classical trajectory and spin precession in external fields will be given. In this paper an abstract spin vector is introduced to characterize the spin of a classical particle. Lagrangians for the classical trajectories and for the motion of the abstract spin vector are derived from corresponding quantum-mechanical Lagrangians by the WKBJ approximation method for nonrelativistic and relativistic particles. The equations of motion for the trajectory and the abstract spin vector following from the extremalization of these Lagrangians are given. The equations of motion for the precession in an external electromagnetic field of the spin vector (or tensor) in space–time is derived from the equations of motion for the abstract spin vector. In the relativistic case, they are equivalent to the Bargmann–Michel–Telegdi equations [Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 435 (1959)]. The relationship between the ensemble and single-particle points of view is also elucidated.