Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

World Scientific series in 20th century physics

Quantum Mechanics, High Energy Physics and Accelerators: Selected Papers of John S Bell (With Commentary)

Published Jan 1, 1995• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789812795854

Related papers

John S. Bell on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•11 citations

John Bell and the Foundation of Quantum Mechanics

Sheldon Goldstein

•Jul 1, 2014•0 citations

John Bell and the Moral Aspect of Quantum Mechanics

Kurt Gottfried, N. David Mermin

Europhysics news•Jan 1, 1991•2 citations

Quantum Mechanics, High Energy Physics and Accelerators: Selected Papers of John S Bell (With Commentary)

Mary Bell, Kurt Gottfried, Martinus J. G. Veltman

The scientific career of John Stewart Bell was distinguished by its breadth and its quality. He made several very important contributions to scientific fields as diverse as accelerator physics, high energy physics and the foundations of quantum mechanics. This book contains a large part of J S Bell's publications, including those that are recognized as his most important achievements, as well as others that are for no good reason less well known. The selection was made by Mary Bell, Martinus Veltman and Kurt Gottfried, all of whom were involved with John Bell both personally and professionally throughout a large part of his life. An introductory chapter has been written to help place the selected papers in a historical context and to review their significance. This book comprises an impressive collection of outstanding scientific work of one of the greatest scientists of the recent past, and it will remain important and influential for a long time to come.

World Scientific series in 20th century physics•Sep 1, 1995•17 citations

Gravitation and the Noise Needed in Objective Reduction Models

Stephen L. Adler

I briefly recall intersections of my research interests with those of John Bell. I then argue that the noise needed in theories of objective state vector reduction most likely comes from a fluctuating complex part in the classical spacetime metric; that is, state vector reduction is driven by complex-number-valued “ space–time foam.” Introduction My research interests have intersected those of John Bell three times. The first was when I found the forward lepton theorem for high-energy neutrino reactions, showing that for forward lepton kinematics, a conserved vector current (CVC) and a partially conserved axial vector current (PCAC) imply that the neutrino cross section can be related to a pion scattering cross section [1]. This led to an exchange of letters and discussions with Bell during 1964–5, which are described in the Commentaries for my selected papers [2]. The second was in the course of my work on the axial-vector anomaly [3], when I had further correspondence with John Bell, as described both in the Commentaries [4] and in the volume of essays on Yang–Mills theories assembled by 't Hooft [5]. The third time was a few years after Bell's death in 1990, when I became interested in the foundations of quantum theory and the quantum measurement problem, in the course of writing my book on quaternionic quantum mechanics [6]. Foundational issues in standard, complex quantum theory had preoccupied Bell for much of his career and led to his best known work. However, my correspondence with Bell in the 1960s never touched on quantum foundations, and I only read his seminal writings on the subject much later on. In this article I focus on this third area of shared interests. Objective Reduction Models There is now a well-defined phenomenology of state vector reduction, pioneered by the work of Ghirardi, Rimini, andWeber (GRW) and of Philip Pearle, and worked on by many others. John Bell was interested in this program from the outset.

arXiv:1401.0353•Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 31, 2016•24 citations

The 1964 paper of John Bell

Ujjwal Sen

We present a commentary on the famous 1964 paper of John Bell that rules out the entire class of underlying hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics that are local.

arXiv:2408.04483•Aug 8, 2024•0 citations
The scientific career of John Stewart Bell was distinguished by its breadth and its quality. He made several very important contributions to scientific fields as diverse as accelerator physics, high energy physics and the foundations of quantum mechanics. This book contains a large part of J S Bell's publications, including those that are recognized as his most important achievements, as well as others that are for no good reason less well known. The selection was made by Mary Bell, Martinus Veltman and Kurt Gottfried, all of whom were involved with John Bell both personally and professionally throughout a large part of his life. An introductory chapter has been written to help place the selected papers in a historical context and to review their significance. This book comprises an impressive collection of outstanding scientific work of one of the greatest scientists of the recent past, and it will remain important and influential for a long time to come.
I briefly recall intersections of my research interests with those of John Bell. I then argue that the noise needed in theories of objective state vector reduction most likely comes from a fluctuating complex part in the classical spacetime metric; that is, state vector reduction is driven by complex-number-valued “ space–time foam.” Introduction My research interests have intersected those of John Bell three times. The first was when I found the forward lepton theorem for high-energy neutrino reactions, showing that for forward lepton kinematics, a conserved vector current (CVC) and a partially conserved axial vector current (PCAC) imply that the neutrino cross section can be related to a pion scattering cross section [1]. This led to an exchange of letters and discussions with Bell during 1964–5, which are described in the Commentaries for my selected papers [2]. The second was in the course of my work on the axial-vector anomaly [3], when I had further correspondence with John Bell, as described both in the Commentaries [4] and in the volume of essays on Yang–Mills theories assembled by 't Hooft [5]. The third time was a few years after Bell's death in 1990, when I became interested in the foundations of quantum theory and the quantum measurement problem, in the course of writing my book on quaternionic quantum mechanics [6]. Foundational issues in standard, complex quantum theory had preoccupied Bell for much of his career and led to his best known work. However, my correspondence with Bell in the 1960s never touched on quantum foundations, and I only read his seminal writings on the subject much later on. In this article I focus on this third area of shared interests. Objective Reduction Models There is now a well-defined phenomenology of state vector reduction, pioneered by the work of Ghirardi, Rimini, andWeber (GRW) and of Philip Pearle, and worked on by many others. John Bell was interested in this program from the outset.