Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of Physics

Spin wave theory of the Heisenberg model for large spin and the classical limit

Published Nov 1, 1969• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0003-4916(69)90189-4

Related papers

Interaction Corrections to Spin-Wave Theory in the Large-S Limit of the Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet

Niels Benedikter

arXiv:1604.02548•Mathematical Physics Analysis and Geometry•Jan 20, 2017•9 citations

On the spin wave problem in the Heisenberg model of Ferromagnetism

J. Zittartz

The European Physical Journal A•Oct 1, 1965•21 citations

On asymptotic limits for the quantum Heisenberg model

Joseph G. Conlon, Jan Philip Solovej

The authors discuss various asymptotic limits of the classical and quantum Heisenberg model. They give a new proof that the thermodynamic free energy of the quantum model converges to the free energy of the classical model in the limit of large spins. They also obtain Gaussian and free Bose gas limits for the classical and quantum models respectively.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 21, 1990•22 citations

Classical and Quantum Theories of Spin

Fabián H. Gaioli, Edgardo T. Garcia Alvarez

arXiv:hep-th/9807131•Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 1998•13 citations

Finite quantum Heisenberg spin models and their approach to the classical limit

Larry Engelhardt, Marshall Luban, Christian Schröder

We determine the temperature range over which classical Heisenberg spin models closely reproduce the zero-field susceptibility of the corresponding quantum Heisenberg models for a finite number $N$ of interacting quantum spins $s$. Using mostly quantum and classical Monte Carlo methods, as well as analytical methods where applicable, we have explored a variety of geometries, including polygons, open chains, and all Platonic and several Archimedean polytopes. These systems range in size from $N=2$ to 120, and we have considered values of $s$ from $1∕2$ to 50 for both antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic exchange. Particular attention is devoted to quantifying the slow convergence of the large $s$ quantum data to the limiting classical data. This is motivated by the desire to define conditions where classical Monte Carlo methods can provide useful predictions for finite quantum Heisenberg spin systems.

Physical Review B•Aug 11, 2006•21 citations

Phase diagram of the half-filled two-dimensional SU ( N ) Hubbard-Heisenberg model: A quantum Monte Carlo study

Fakher F. Assaad

We investigate the phase diagram of the half-filled $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ Hubbard-Heisenberg model with hopping $t$, exchange $J$, and Hubbard $U$, on a two-dimensional square lattice. In the large-$N$ limit, and as a function of decreasing values of $t∕J$, the model shows a transition from a $d$-density wave state to a spin dimerized insulator. A similar behavior is observed at $N=6$ whereas at $N=2$ a spin density wave insulating ground state is stabilized. The $N=4$ model, has a $d$-density wave ground state at large values of $t∕J$ which as a function of decreasing values of $t∕J$ becomes unstable to an insulating state with no apparent lattice and spin broken symmetries. In this state, the staggered spin-spin correlations decay as a power law, resulting in gapless spin excitations at $\stackrel{P\vec}{q}=(\ensuremath{\pi},\ensuremath{\pi})$. Furthermore, low lying spin modes with small spectral weight are apparent around the wave vectors $\stackrel{P\vec}{q}=(0,\ensuremath{\pi})$ and $\stackrel{P\vec}{q}=(\ensuremath{\pi},0)$. This gapless spin liquid state is equally found in the SU(4) Heisenberg $(U∕t\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty})$ model in the self-adjoint antisymmetric representation. An interpretation of this state in terms of a $\ensuremath{\pi}$-flux phase is offered. Our results stem from projective $(T=0)$ quantum Monte Carlo simulations on lattice sizes ranging up to $24\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}24$.

arXiv:cond-mat/0406074•Physical Review B•Feb 4, 2005•139 citations
We determine the temperature range over which classical Heisenberg spin models closely reproduce the zero-field susceptibility of the corresponding quantum Heisenberg models for a finite number NNN of interacting quantum spins sss. Using mostly quantum and classical Monte Carlo methods, as well as analytical methods where applicable, we have explored a variety of geometries, including polygons, open chains, and all Platonic and several Archimedean polytopes. These systems range in size from N=2N=2N=2 to 120, and we have considered values of sss from 1∕21∕21∕2 to 50 for both antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic exchange. Particular attention is devoted to quantifying the slow convergence of the large sss quantum data to the limiting classical data. This is motivated by the desire to define conditions where classical Monte Carlo methods can provide useful predictions for finite quantum Heisenberg spin systems.
We investigate the phase diagram of the half-filled SU(N)\mathrm{SU}(N)SU(N) Hubbard-Heisenberg model with hopping ttt, exchange JJJ, and Hubbard UUU, on a two-dimensional square lattice. In the large-NNN limit, and as a function of decreasing values of t∕Jt∕Jt∕J, the model shows a transition from a ddd-density wave state to a spin dimerized insulator. A similar behavior is observed at N=6N=6N=6 whereas at N=2N=2N=2 a spin density wave insulating ground state is stabilized. The N=4N=4N=4 model, has a ddd-density wave ground state at large values of t∕Jt∕Jt∕J which as a function of decreasing values of t∕Jt∕Jt∕J becomes unstable to an insulating state with no apparent lattice and spin broken symmetries. In this state, the staggered spin-spin correlations decay as a power law, resulting in gapless spin excitations at $\stackrel{P\vec}{q}=(\ensuremath{\pi},\ensuremath{\pi})$. Furthermore, low lying spin modes with small spectral weight are apparent around the wave vectors $\stackrel{P\vec}{q}=(0,\ensuremath{\pi})$ and $\stackrel{P\vec}{q}=(\ensuremath{\pi},0)$. This gapless spin liquid state is equally found in the SU(4) Heisenberg $(U∕t\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty})$ model in the self-adjoint antisymmetric representation. An interpretation of this state in terms of a $\ensuremath{\pi}$-flux phase is offered. Our results stem from projective (T=0)(T=0)(T=0) quantum Monte Carlo simulations on lattice sizes ranging up to $24\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}24$.