Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

QUANTUM DEPHASING BY CHAOS

Published Feb 1, 1998• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We examine whether the chaotic behavior of classical systems with a limited number of degrees of freedom can produce quantum dephasing, against the conventional idea that dephasing takes place only in large systems with a huge number of constituents and complicated internal interactions.On the basis of this analysis, we briefly discuss the possibility of defining quantum chaos and of inventing a "chaos detector".

DOI
10.1142/9789812817099_0009

Related papers

Extreme Decoherence and Quantum Chaos

Zhenyu Xu, Luis Pedro García-Pintos, Aurélia Chenu +1 more

We study the ultimate limits to the decoherence rate associated with dephasing processes. Fluctuating chaotic quantum systems are shown to exhibit extreme decoherence, with a rate that scales exponentially with the particle number, thus exceeding the polynomial dependence of systems with fluctuating k-body interactions. Our findings suggest the use of quantum chaotic systems as a natural test bed for spontaneous wave function collapse models. We further discuss the implications on the decoherence of AdS/CFT black holes resulting from the unitarity loss associated with energy dephasing.

arXiv:1810.02319•Physical Review Letters•Jan 9, 2019•67 citations

Extreme Decoherence: from Quantum Chaos to Black Holes

Zhenyu Xu, Luis Pedro García-Pintos, Aurélia Chenu +1 more

We study the ultimate limits to the decoherence rate associated with dephasing processes. Fluctuating chaotic quantum systems are shown to exhibit extreme decoherence, with a rate that scales exponentially with the particle number, thus exceeding the polynomial dependence of systems with fluctuating $k$-body interactions. Our findings suggest the use of quantum chaotic systems as a natural test-bed for spontaneous wave function collapse models. We further discuss the implications on the decoherence of AdS/CFT black holes resulting from the unitarity loss associated with energy dephasing.

•Oct 4, 2018•1 citation

Dynamical Chaos and Decoherence

Giulio Casati, Davide Rossini

Fidelity is a convenient tool to study the sensitivity of quantum motion under Hamiltonian perturbations. In this paper we first show that classical chaos can produce the dephasing necessary to suppress quantum interference, even in the absence of any environment. To this end we consider the fidelity of mixed states, which takes into account interference amplitudes, and directly relate its decay to the decay of an appropriate classical correlation function, which is totally unrelated to quantum phases. We then discuss the dephasing in a two-qubit system, induced by the coupling to a single-particle, deterministic chaotic environment. The latter is shown to behave as a pure dephasing many-body object which induces decoherence in the system; memory effects are also taken into account.

Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement•Jan 1, 2007•3 citations

Coherence-preserving chaos in a mixed quantum classical description

Jiangbin Gong, Gong-ou Xu, Rui-hua Xie

We give here a physical picture that exponential instability can occur with the coherence of states preserved in a mixed quantum classical description. Taking advantage of the concept of the geometrical structure of a quantum system, we are able to illustrate our ideas with some examples in a simple manner. This kind of chaos may be important for further investigations of chaotic behaviors in systems with both quantum and classical degrees of freedom.

Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics•Jul 1, 1995•2 citations

Quantum dissipation due to the interaction with chaos

Doron Cohen, Tsampikos Kottos

We discuss the possibility of having "quantum dissipation" due to the interaction with chaotic degrees of freedom. We define the conditions that should be satisfied in order to have a dissipative effect similar to the one due to an interaction with a (many body) bath. We also compare with the case where the environment is modeled by a random matrix model. In the case of interaction with "chaos" we observe a regime where the relaxation process is nonuniversal and reflects the underlaying semiclassical dynamics. As an example we consider a two level system (spin) that interacts with a two-dimensional anharmonic oscillator.

arXiv:cond-mat/0302319•Physical Review E•May 25, 2004•27 citations

Hamiltonian Chaos III

Niraj Srivastava, Charles Kaufman, Gerhard H. Muller

Does quantum chaos exist?If it exists, what is it?If it does not, what was it supposed to have been?Why should we associate chaos with a "third revolution in physics" if it fails to be expressible in terms of quantum mechanics, our most fundamental theory of physical reality?Is there something wrong with quantum mechanics?Or is chaos merely a mathematical construct relevant only for models in classical mechanics?Is the human mind doomed to interpret and understand quantum mechanics in classical terms?The list of unanswered questions in quantum chaos research itself shows symptoms of the phenomenon it attempts to grasp. 1 How do we recognize classical Hamiltonian chaos?We have dealt with this question in our two previous columns.2,3 In Part I we discussed the implications of integrability and non-integrability for the phase-space trajectories of classical Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom.We described the method of Poincaré surfaces of section as a convenient and striking discriminant between the two possibilities.In Part II we searched for an alternate mode of representation for classical Hamiltonian systems, a mode that is an equally powerful indicator of chaos, but one that can be more directly translated into quantum mechanics than the Poincaré map.We proposed a representation based on the construction of classical invariants via time averages of dynamical variables, a representation that can be employed under very general circumstances including integrable and nonintegrable models.In this column we shall construct quantum invariants, demonstrate the impact of non-integrability on these quantities, and discuss their properties in relation to their classical counterparts.In a future column we intend to introduce quantum Poincaré surfaces of section for stationary states and bring full circle our survey of quantum and classical Hamiltonian chaos.Consider a quantized integrable model.Its eigenstates are labeled by quantum numbers.There are as many quantum numbers as there are degrees of freedom.Each quantum number represents a quantized action.In the still evolving language of quantum chaos, quantum numbers are said to have been "lost" in the transition from a quantum system whose classical counterpart is integrable to one whose counterpart is chaotic.The broken, or lost, tori of classical chaos become lost quantum numbers of quantum chaos.As we shall see, the loss of quantum numbers is vividly mirrored in the behavior of the quantum invariants.We begin by describing the construction of the quantum invariants for a

Computers in Physics•Jan 1, 1992•3 citations
We examine whether the chaotic behavior of classical systems with a limited number of degrees of freedom can produce quantum dephasing, against the conventional idea that dephasing takes place only in large systems with a huge number of constituents and complicated internal interactions.On the basis of this analysis, we briefly discuss the possibility of defining quantum chaos and of inventing a "chaos detector".
We study the ultimate limits to the decoherence rate associated with dephasing processes. Fluctuating chaotic quantum systems are shown to exhibit extreme decoherence, with a rate that scales exponentially with the particle number, thus exceeding the polynomial dependence of systems with fluctuating k-body interactions. Our findings suggest the use of quantum chaotic systems as a natural test bed for spontaneous wave function collapse models. We further discuss the implications on the decoherence of AdS/CFT black holes resulting from the unitarity loss associated with energy dephasing.
We study the ultimate limits to the decoherence rate associated with dephasing processes. Fluctuating chaotic quantum systems are shown to exhibit extreme decoherence, with a rate that scales exponentially with the particle number, thus exceeding the polynomial dependence of systems with fluctuating kkk-body interactions. Our findings suggest the use of quantum chaotic systems as a natural test-bed for spontaneous wave function collapse models. We further discuss the implications on the decoherence of AdS/CFT black holes resulting from the unitarity loss associated with energy dephasing.
Fidelity is a convenient tool to study the sensitivity of quantum motion under Hamiltonian perturbations. In this paper we first show that classical chaos can produce the dephasing necessary to suppress quantum interference, even in the absence of any environment. To this end we consider the fidelity of mixed states, which takes into account interference amplitudes, and directly relate its decay to the decay of an appropriate classical correlation function, which is totally unrelated to quantum phases. We then discuss the dephasing in a two-qubit system, induced by the coupling to a single-particle, deterministic chaotic environment. The latter is shown to behave as a pure dephasing many-body object which induces decoherence in the system; memory effects are also taken into account.
We discuss the possibility of having "quantum dissipation" due to the interaction with chaotic degrees of freedom. We define the conditions that should be satisfied in order to have a dissipative effect similar to the one due to an interaction with a (many body) bath. We also compare with the case where the environment is modeled by a random matrix model. In the case of interaction with "chaos" we observe a regime where the relaxation process is nonuniversal and reflects the underlaying semiclassical dynamics. As an example we consider a two level system (spin) that interacts with a two-dimensional anharmonic oscillator.
Does quantum chaos exist?If it exists, what is it?If it does not, what was it supposed to have been?Why should we associate chaos with a "third revolution in physics" if it fails to be expressible in terms of quantum mechanics, our most fundamental theory of physical reality?Is there something wrong with quantum mechanics?Or is chaos merely a mathematical construct relevant only for models in classical mechanics?Is the human mind doomed to interpret and understand quantum mechanics in classical terms?The list of unanswered questions in quantum chaos research itself shows symptoms of the phenomenon it attempts to grasp. 1 How do we recognize classical Hamiltonian chaos?We have dealt with this question in our two previous columns.2,3 In Part I we discussed the implications of integrability and non-integrability for the phase-space trajectories of classical Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom.We described the method of Poincaré surfaces of section as a convenient and striking discriminant between the two possibilities.In Part II we searched for an alternate mode of representation for classical Hamiltonian systems, a mode that is an equally powerful indicator of chaos, but one that can be more directly translated into quantum mechanics than the Poincaré map.We proposed a representation based on the construction of classical invariants via time averages of dynamical variables, a representation that can be employed under very general circumstances including integrable and nonintegrable models.In this column we shall construct quantum invariants, demonstrate the impact of non-integrability on these quantities, and discuss their properties in relation to their classical counterparts.In a future column we intend to introduce quantum Poincaré surfaces of section for stationary states and bring full circle our survey of quantum and classical Hamiltonian chaos.Consider a quantized integrable model.Its eigenstates are labeled by quantum numbers.There are as many quantum numbers as there are degrees of freedom.Each quantum number represents a quantized action.In the still evolving language of quantum chaos, quantum numbers are said to have been "lost" in the transition from a quantum system whose classical counterpart is integrable to one whose counterpart is chaotic.The broken, or lost, tori of classical chaos become lost quantum numbers of quantum chaos.As we shall see, the loss of quantum numbers is vividly mirrored in the behavior of the quantum invariants.We begin by describing the construction of the quantum invariants for a