In the first part of this chapter we shall show how it is possible to represent dynamical variables by matrices instead of differential operators without affecting the predicted results of physically significant quantities. We shall see that, although this representation is often more complicated and cumbersome than the methods used earlier, it has a particularly simple form when applied to problems involving angular momentum, and has the great advantage that it can be used in the case of spin where no differential operator representation exists. We shall use such spin matrices to analyze experiments designed to measure the components of spin in various directions and find that these provide an important and illustrative example of the quantum theory of measurement.
In the first part of this chapter we shall show how it is possible to represent dynamical variables by matrices instead of differential operators without affecting the predicted results of physically significant quantities. We shall see that, although this representation is often more complicated and cumbersome than the methods used earlier, it has a particularly simple form when applied to problems involving angular momentum, and has the great advantage that it can be used in the case of spin where no differential operator representation exists. We shall use such spin matrices to analyze experiments designed to measure the components of spin in various directions and find that these provide an important and illustrative example of the quantum theory of measurement.
Angular momentum is a very important and revealing property of many physical systems. In classical mechanics the principle of conservation of angular momentum is a powerful aid to the solution of such problems as the orbits of planets and satellites and the behaviour of gyroscopes and tops. The role of angular momentum in quantum mechanics is probably even more important and this will be the subject of the present chapter and the next. We shall find that the operators representing the components of angular momentum do not commute with each other, although they all commute with the operator representing the total angular momentum. It follows that no pair of these components can be measured compatibly and we shall therefore look for a set of eigenfunctions that are common to the operators representing the total angular momentum and one of its components. We shall find that the angular momentum eigenvalues always form a discrete set and that, in the case of a central field, the operators commute with the Hamiltonian, implying that the total angular momentum and one component can be measured compatibly with the energy in this case, so that their values, once measured, remain constant in time. Consideration of angular momentum will also enable us to make predictions about the behaviour of atoms in magnetic fields, and we shall find that these are in agreement with experiment only if we assume that the electron (in common with many other fundamental particles) has an intrinsic “spin” angular momentum in addition to the “orbital” angular momentum associated with its motion. The interaction between spin and orbital angular momenta leads to detailed features of the atomic spectra which are known as “fine structure.” We shall also use the measurement of angular momentum to illustrate the quantum theory of measurement discussed in the previous chapter.
Chapter 11 is devoted to the quantum theory of angular momentum. As in classical mechanics, working with angular momentum requires leaving the one-dimensional space, with all the complications that this entails. The importance of angular momentum resides in at least three facts: i) central problems are of particular interest; (ii) many particles have an intrinsic angular momentum (the spin); and iii) the physics of angular momentum involves features such as the so-called space quantization. The first part of the chapter deals with the orbital angular momentum and its eigenfunctions, the spherical harmonics. Its algebraic properties, embodied in the matrix representation, allow for an extension of the theory to half-integer angular momentum in terms of Pauli matrices, as well as the addition of angular momenta.
Spin-s systems Angular momentum is one of the fundamental quantities of Newtonian physics, and in quantum physics its importance is at least as great. In quantum mechanics we often distinguish between two types of angular momentum: orbital angular momentum , which a system of particles possesses due to particle motion through space; and spin angular momentum , which is an intrinsic property of a particle. The distinction will be important later, but for now we will ignore it. We will here refer to angular momentum of any sort as “spin” and develop general-purpose mathematical tools for its description. We have already dealt with spin systems, particularly the example of a spin-½ particle. Our approach began with the empirical observation that a measurement of any spin component of a spin-½ particle could yield only the results +ħ/2 or −ħ/2. We introduced the basis states | z ±〉 for the two-dimensional Hilbert space ℋ. We also gave other basis states such as {| x ±〉} and {| y ±〉} in terms of the | z ±〉 states. From basis states and measurement values we constructed operators for the spin components S x , S y , and S z . With the operators in hand, we could then examine the algebraic relations between them (such as the commutation relation in Exercise 3.56). Our job here is to generalize our analysis to systems of arbitrary spin. To do this, we will reverse our chain of logic.
In this chapter, we develop the background needed to move our quantum mechanical formalism fully into three dimensions. We discuss angular momentum, which is the motional complement to spin angular momentum, that we developed earlier. There are some critical differences between orbital and spin angular momentum, and we need to carefully discuss how they relate and how they differ. Why is angular momentum so important? Because in problems where we have central forces (forces that depend only on the distance between two particles and act along the line connecting the two particles), the angular momentum is conserved. So, it becomes an integral part of how we solve the problem. The most important problem we have to solve, the hydrogen atom, is a central force problem; hence, we need this work before we can move forward to some really interesting physics that will come in Chap. 11 . We cover the angular momentum operators, eigenvalues, and eigenstates, their matrix representations, how to combine angular momentum, and spherical harmonics. We revisit the EPR experiment using our new formalism. We also discuss some unique representations of angular momentum by mapping to two-dimensional harmonic oscillators, as developed by Schwinger.
The quantum mechanical description of the azimuthal rotation angle and the orbital angular momentum around the polar axis differs greatly from the description of position and momentum. This has led to a controversy over the existence of a self-adjoint angle operator in the literature. It is possible to circumvent the problems of defining a self-adjoint operator for a periodic variable by using trigonometric functions of operators as a basis for the quantum mechanical description. This approach, however, does not allow us to study the properties of the angle operator itself. By using a state space of an arbitrarily large yet finite number of dimensions, it is possible to introduce angle and orbital angular momentum as a conjugate pair of variables both represented by Hermitian matrices. After physical and measurable quantities have been calculated in this state space the number of dimensions is allowed to tend to infinity in a limiting procedure. The first part of this chapter reviews the difficulties associated with the quantum mechanical formulation of angle and orbital angular momentum and presents a way to overcome these problems using a finite-dimensional state space. In the second part this formulation is generalised to include the phenomenon of non-integer orbital angular momentum. This part is based on a chapter of the PhD thesis of Götte [1], where further details may be found. Introduction The correct description of a periodic variable such as a rotation angle or the optical phase has been a long standing problem in quantum mechanics. At the root of the problem is the question of whether the variable itself is restricted in a 2 π radian range or whether it evolves continuously without bound.
The theory of angular momentum performance a significant position in the classical and quantum mechanical study of physical properties, such as studies into nuclear, atomic, and molecular processes, as well as other quantum problems, including spherical symmetry. In this analysis, angular momentum operators are described in multiple ways, based on the angular momentum operator's commutator, matrix, and geometric representation, The eigenvalue and eigenvector were also known for operatorsJ ̂_±,J ⃑ ̂^2, J ̂_x,J ̂_y and J ̂_zwithin the |j,┤ ├ m⟩ basis. Furthermore, in quantum mechanics, angular momentum is called quantized variable, meaning that it comes in discrete quantities. In contrast to the macroscopic system case where a continuous variable is angular momentum.