Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Routledge eBooks

Many Worlds

Dan Gilhooley, Frank Toich

Published Sep 23, 2019• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.4324/9780429320446-8

Related papers

A World of Many Worlds

Marisol de la Cadena, Mario Blaser

•Jan 1, 2018•47 citations

A World of Many Worlds

Duke University Press eBooks•Oct 25, 2018•6 citations

A World of Many Worlds

Duke University Press eBooks•Oct 25, 2018•116 citations

A World of Many Worlds

Duke University Press eBooks•Jan 1, 2018•300 citations

Many Worlds

Benjamin Bähr, Boris Lemmer, Rina Piccolo

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

MNOGI SVJETOVI KVANTNE MEHANIKE I MODALNOG REALIZMA

Milena Radović

The purpose of this paper is to give an overview of modal realism and many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics and compare the concepts of many worlds in those two theories. Main source for modal realism is David Lewis' book On the Plurality of Worlds (1986). For many worlds interpretation I rely on Bryce DeWitt and Lev Vaidman. First part of the paper concerns modal realism, second is about many worlds interpretation and third is the comparison of those two. Many worlds in modal realism and many worlds interpretation have the same phenomenology, but are different ontologically. The worlds of modal realism are causally and spatiotemporally separated and have always been, while the worlds of many worlds interpretation are part of a branching universe. That means they were the same world at some point in the past, even though they are equally separated, as the worlds of modal realism are, after the branching.

•Aug 26, 2018•0 citations
The purpose of this paper is to give an overview of modal realism and many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics and compare the concepts of many worlds in those two theories. Main source for modal realism is David Lewis' book On the Plurality of Worlds (1986). For many worlds interpretation I rely on Bryce DeWitt and Lev Vaidman. First part of the paper concerns modal realism, second is about many worlds interpretation and third is the comparison of those two. Many worlds in modal realism and many worlds interpretation have the same phenomenology, but are different ontologically. The worlds of modal realism are causally and spatiotemporally separated and have always been, while the worlds of many worlds interpretation are part of a branching universe. That means they were the same world at some point in the past, even though they are equally separated, as the worlds of modal realism are, after the branching.