Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Edizioni della Normale eBooks

Gaussian states

Alexander Semenovich Holevo

Published Jan 1, 2011• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Consider a quantum degree of freedom, e.g., an oscillator, described by the canonical observables q = Q, p = ℏP. The ground state |0)(0| is the minimum-uncertainty state in which Q and P have zero mean values. The state 5.1.1 $$ \left| {\left. {\overline P ,\overline Q } \right)\left( {\overline Q ,\overline P } \right.} \right| = W_{\overline Q ,\hbar \overline P } \left| {\left. 0 \right)\left( 0 \right.} \right|W_{\overline Q ,\hbar \overline P }^* $$ (where to simplify notations we put $$ \left| {\left. {\overline P ,\overline Q } \right)} \right. \equiv \left| {\left. {\overline P ,\overline Q ;{\hbar \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\hbar {2\omega }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {2\omega }}} \right)} \right. $$ ω being the oscillator frequency) can be regarded as the result of an external influence onto the object in ground state, shifting the mean values of the canonical observables but leaving their uncertainties unchanged.

DOI
10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9_5

Related papers

Tuning the separability in noncommutative space

Pinaki Patra

With the help of the generalized Peres–Horodecki separability criterion (Simon’s condition) for a bipartite Gaussian state, we have studied the separability of the noncommutative (NC) space coordinate degrees of freedom. Non-symplectic nature of the transformation between the usual commutative space and NC space restricts the straightforward use of Simon’s condition in NCS. We have transformed the NCS system to an equivalent Hamiltonian in commutative space through the Bopp shift, which enables the utilization of the separability criterion. To make our study fairly general and to analyze the effect of parameters on the separability of bipartite state in NC-space, we have considered a bilinear Hamiltonian with time-dependent (TD) parameters, along with a TD external interaction, which is linear in field modes. The system is transformed (Sp(4,R)) into canonical form keeping the intrinsic symplectic structure intact. The solution of the TD-Schrödinger equation is obtained with the help of the Lewis–Riesenfeld invariant method (LRIM). Expectation values of the observables (thus the covariance matrix) are constructed from the states obtained from LRIM. It turns out that the existence of the NC parameters in the oscillator determines the separability of the states. In particular, for isotropic oscillators, the separability condition for the bipartite Gaussian states depends on specific values of NC parameters. Moreover, particular anisotropic parameter values for the oscillator may cease the separability. In other words, both the deformation parameters (θ, η) and parameter values of the oscillator (mass, frequency) are important characteristics for the separability of bipartite Gaussian states. Thus tuning the parameter values, one can destroy or recreate the separability of states. With the help of a toy model, we have demonstrated how the tuning of a TD-NC space parameter affects the separability.

arXiv:2304.13035•Journal of Mathematical Physics•May 1, 2024•1 citation

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a Hermitian Gaussian Operator: Role of the Schrödinger-Robertson Uncertainty Relation

Robert F. Snider

Vide Leaf, Hyderabad eBooks•Nov 7, 2022•0 citations

Gaussian States of Continuous Variable Systems

Alessio Serafini

Quantum continuous variable systems are quantum systems obeying the canonical commutation relations. As we have seen in the previous chapter, such systems always require the adoption of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, even when a finite number of degrees of freedom is considered. Besides making their dynamics potentially intractable, this fact also implies that the study of properties related to the information and correlation content of continuous variable systems turns out to be particularly difficult. A widely known way to make continuous variable systems more tractable is to consider the restriction to Gaussian states. Already well trodden in older research on quantum optics, the study of Gaussian systems has more recently become a central theme of continuous variable quantum information. If open quantum systems, coupled to an external environment, are considered, the Gaussian regime applies when the system couples linearly to its environment and when system and environment are governed by Hamiltonians which are at most quadratic in the canonical operators (or, equivalently, when the overall Hamiltonian of system and environment is at most quadratic). These conditions may seem rather restrictive but, as we shall point out in the course of the book, are actually ordinarily met by a vast number of existing experimental set-ups in the areas of quantum optics, trapped ions, optomechanics, atomic ensembles and certain superconducting degrees of freedom (all of these platforms are reviewed in Chapter 9 ). What we will refer to as Gaussian measurements – POVMs that preserve the Gaussian character of initial states – are also customarily carried out with comparatively high efficiency, while the description of quantum noise can be incorporated seamlessly into the Gaussian picture. What is perhaps even more important to note is that the restriction to the Gaussian realm, while not exhaustive of the full wealth of dynamics and situations allowed in the whole Hilbert space, still lets one include most of the processes relevant to quantum technologies. Squeezing, whereby certain canonical quadratures have uncertainties below the vacuum state noise, and can hence be used in precision measurements, quantum entanglement, and cooling, where the entropy is drained out of a system in order to reach a pure quantum state and thus initialise information protocols or low noise experiments, may all be described within the Gaussian regime. Within the quantum information discourse, the Gaussian restriction has been often criticised on the grounds that no real genuinely quantum effects can ever be observed without leaving it at some point, since the statistics obtained from Gaussian states through Gaussian measurements can be reproduced by classical probability distributions. While technically correct, the reader should be reminded that such critiques often disregard the fact that the object described by a Gaussian state does entail a genuinely quantum description in a Hilbert space. Hence, for instance, the preparation of a pure Gaussian quantum state is the preparation of a pure vector of the Hilbert space. Likewise, a highly squeezed Gaussian state prepared for a metrological protocol is a state with very low noise in a certain physical observable, regardless of whether it can be mimicked by a classical distribution or not. The testing and exploitation of quantum non-locality (stronger than classical correlations that imply the presence of quantum entanglement) with Gaussian states does instead require a departure from Gaussian measurements. However, as we will see, certain non-Gaussian measurements are customarily implemented with current technology, and it is hence still relevant to study in detail the creation of such a resource for Gaussian states. This chapter will introduce Gaussian states from a somewhat unusual angle: as ground and thermal states of at most second-order Hamiltonians. Our treatment will highlight the privileged role played by quadratic canonical ( i.e. , ‘symplectic’) transformations in this context, which we will take care to describe in full generality, and will hinge on the reduction of Gaussian states into their normal modes, which allows for their systematic diagonalisation. We will then proceed to explore an equivalent characterisation in terms of statistical moments of the canonical operators, and to introduce the implications of non-commutativity on such statistics in the form of the Robertson–Schrödinger uncertainty relation.

CRC Press eBooks•Jun 1, 2023•0 citations

Gaussian states as minimum uncertainty states

Shuangshuang Fu, Shunlong Luo, Yue Zhang

Physics Letters A•Oct 8, 2019•17 citations

Influence of dissipation on quantum wave dynamics in confined potential systems

A. A. Smirnovsky, Andrey L. Sanin

Quantum dynamics of wave packet in one-dimensional system with distributed potential and dissipation is investigated in context of Schrodinger-Langevin-Kostin equation. Quadratic potential and double well potential bounded by external impenetrable walls are represented as examples. Numerical simulations are carried out for initial Gaussian packet at different values of dissipation parameters. For the quantum oscillator with dissipation the asymptotic dynamical limit in time is established. The mean values of coordinate and velocity tend to zero but uncertainty relation tends to minimal value 0.5 (in atomic units). Oscillations and resonances at external time-dependent action were studied. Dynamical properties of system with double well potential are investigated at different frequencies of external action. Fourier spectra of mean coordinate are characterized by sharply expressed singular components.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Feb 23, 2006•1 citation

Set of orthogonal conditional probability distributions and quantum oscillator states

Igor Ya. Doskoch, Margarita A. Man’ko

Journal of Russian Laser Research•Sep 1, 2024•0 citations
Consider a quantum degree of freedom, e.g., an oscillator, described by the canonical observables q = Q, p = ℏP. The ground state |0)(0| is the minimum-uncertainty state in which Q and P have zero mean values. The state 5.1.1 ∣P‾,Q‾)(Q‾,P‾∣=WQ‾,ℏP‾∣0)(0∣WQ‾,ℏP‾∗\left| {\left. {\overline P ,\overline Q } \right)\left( {\overline Q ,\overline P } \right.} \right| = W_{\overline Q ,\hbar \overline P } \left| {\left. 0 \right)\left( 0 \right.} \right|W_{\overline Q ,\hbar \overline P }^*​P,Q​)(Q​,P​=WQ​,ℏP​∣0)(0∣WQ​,ℏP∗​ (where to simplify notations we put \left| {\left. {\overline P ,\overline Q } \right)} \right. \equiv \left| {\left. {\overline P ,\overline Q ;{\hbar \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\hbar {2\omega }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {2\omega }}} \right)} \right. ω being the oscillator frequency) can be regarded as the result of an external influence onto the object in ground state, shifting the mean values of the canonical observables but leaving their uncertainties unchanged.
With the help of the generalized Peres–Horodecki separability criterion (Simon’s condition) for a bipartite Gaussian state, we have studied the separability of the noncommutative (NC) space coordinate degrees of freedom. Non-symplectic nature of the transformation between the usual commutative space and NC space restricts the straightforward use of Simon’s condition in NCS. We have transformed the NCS system to an equivalent Hamiltonian in commutative space through the Bopp shift, which enables the utilization of the separability criterion. To make our study fairly general and to analyze the effect of parameters on the separability of bipartite state in NC-space, we have considered a bilinear Hamiltonian with time-dependent (TD) parameters, along with a TD external interaction, which is linear in field modes. The system is transformed (Sp(4,R)) into canonical form keeping the intrinsic symplectic structure intact. The solution of the TD-Schrödinger equation is obtained with the help of the Lewis–Riesenfeld invariant method (LRIM). Expectation values of the observables (thus the covariance matrix) are constructed from the states obtained from LRIM. It turns out that the existence of the NC parameters in the oscillator determines the separability of the states. In particular, for isotropic oscillators, the separability condition for the bipartite Gaussian states depends on specific values of NC parameters. Moreover, particular anisotropic parameter values for the oscillator may cease the separability. In other words, both the deformation parameters (θ, η) and parameter values of the oscillator (mass, frequency) are important characteristics for the separability of bipartite Gaussian states. Thus tuning the parameter values, one can destroy or recreate the separability of states. With the help of a toy model, we have demonstrated how the tuning of a TD-NC space parameter affects the separability.
Quantum continuous variable systems are quantum systems obeying the canonical commutation relations. As we have seen in the previous chapter, such systems always require the adoption of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, even when a finite number of degrees of freedom is considered. Besides making their dynamics potentially intractable, this fact also implies that the study of properties related to the information and correlation content of continuous variable systems turns out to be particularly difficult. A widely known way to make continuous variable systems more tractable is to consider the restriction to Gaussian states. Already well trodden in older research on quantum optics, the study of Gaussian systems has more recently become a central theme of continuous variable quantum information. If open quantum systems, coupled to an external environment, are considered, the Gaussian regime applies when the system couples linearly to its environment and when system and environment are governed by Hamiltonians which are at most quadratic in the canonical operators (or, equivalently, when the overall Hamiltonian of system and environment is at most quadratic). These conditions may seem rather restrictive but, as we shall point out in the course of the book, are actually ordinarily met by a vast number of existing experimental set-ups in the areas of quantum optics, trapped ions, optomechanics, atomic ensembles and certain superconducting degrees of freedom (all of these platforms are reviewed in Chapter 9 ). What we will refer to as Gaussian measurements – POVMs that preserve the Gaussian character of initial states – are also customarily carried out with comparatively high efficiency, while the description of quantum noise can be incorporated seamlessly into the Gaussian picture. What is perhaps even more important to note is that the restriction to the Gaussian realm, while not exhaustive of the full wealth of dynamics and situations allowed in the whole Hilbert space, still lets one include most of the processes relevant to quantum technologies. Squeezing, whereby certain canonical quadratures have uncertainties below the vacuum state noise, and can hence be used in precision measurements, quantum entanglement, and cooling, where the entropy is drained out of a system in order to reach a pure quantum state and thus initialise information protocols or low noise experiments, may all be described within the Gaussian regime. Within the quantum information discourse, the Gaussian restriction has been often criticised on the grounds that no real genuinely quantum effects can ever be observed without leaving it at some point, since the statistics obtained from Gaussian states through Gaussian measurements can be reproduced by classical probability distributions. While technically correct, the reader should be reminded that such critiques often disregard the fact that the object described by a Gaussian state does entail a genuinely quantum description in a Hilbert space. Hence, for instance, the preparation of a pure Gaussian quantum state is the preparation of a pure vector of the Hilbert space. Likewise, a highly squeezed Gaussian state prepared for a metrological protocol is a state with very low noise in a certain physical observable, regardless of whether it can be mimicked by a classical distribution or not. The testing and exploitation of quantum non-locality (stronger than classical correlations that imply the presence of quantum entanglement) with Gaussian states does instead require a departure from Gaussian measurements. However, as we will see, certain non-Gaussian measurements are customarily implemented with current technology, and it is hence still relevant to study in detail the creation of such a resource for Gaussian states. This chapter will introduce Gaussian states from a somewhat unusual angle: as ground and thermal states of at most second-order Hamiltonians. Our treatment will highlight the privileged role played by quadratic canonical ( i.e. , ‘symplectic’) transformations in this context, which we will take care to describe in full generality, and will hinge on the reduction of Gaussian states into their normal modes, which allows for their systematic diagonalisation. We will then proceed to explore an equivalent characterisation in terms of statistical moments of the canonical operators, and to introduce the implications of non-commutativity on such statistics in the form of the Robertson–Schrödinger uncertainty relation.
Quantum dynamics of wave packet in one-dimensional system with distributed potential and dissipation is investigated in context of Schrodinger-Langevin-Kostin equation. Quadratic potential and double well potential bounded by external impenetrable walls are represented as examples. Numerical simulations are carried out for initial Gaussian packet at different values of dissipation parameters. For the quantum oscillator with dissipation the asymptotic dynamical limit in time is established. The mean values of coordinate and velocity tend to zero but uncertainty relation tends to minimal value 0.5 (in atomic units). Oscillations and resonances at external time-dependent action were studied. Dynamical properties of system with double well potential are investigated at different frequencies of external action. Fourier spectra of mean coordinate are characterized by sharply expressed singular components.