Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Physical and Engineering Sciences

Is quantum mechanics useful?

Rolf W. Landauer

Published Dec 15, 1995• 124 citations

Abstract

Abstract Technologies differ in their explicit utilization of quantum mechanical behaviour. A transistor, despite its roots in energy band structure, does not invoke quantum mechanically coherent transmission between terminals. The impressive progress in the past decade in mesoscopic physics, when combined with studies that have analysed a totally quantum mechanical computational process, suggest that we may be ready to move toward more quantum mechanical procedures for information processing. This paper is a warning signal; this possibility is beset by problems. The case will be made via two separate but complementary arguments. First, by summarizing this author's published comments on computation via totally quantum mechanical coherent Hamiltonians. The computation is likely to suffer from localization, i.e. from reflection of the computational trajectory, causing the computation to turn around. Additionally, small errors will accumulate and cause the computation to go off track. This is supplemented by analysis of specific proposals that suggest more detailed machinery than invoked in the general literature on quantum mechanical Hamiltonian computation.

DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1995.0106

Related papers

Quantum Information Science: An Update

L. C. Kwek, Freddy Permana Zen

It is now roughly thirty years since the incipient ideas on quantum information science was concretely formalized. Over the last three decades, there has been much development in this field, and at least one technology, namely devices for quantum cryptography, is now commercialized. Yet, the holy grail of a workable quantum computing machine still lies faraway at the horizon. In any case, it took nearly several centuries before the vacuum tubes were invented after the first mechanical calculating were constructed, and several decades later, for the transistor to bring the current computer technology to fruition. In this review, we provide a short survey of the current development and progress in quantum information science. It clearly does not do justice to the amount of work in the past thirty years. Nevertheless, despite the modest attempt, this review hopes to induce younger researchers into this exciting field.

Journal of Physics Conference SeriesAug 1, 20160 citations

From Experimental Records to Wave–Particle Duality Judgments: A Habitat Information Physics Audit of the Experimental Inference Chain

Zhou Zheng

Optical experiments have produced reliable and diverse records of spatial distributions, localized detection, energy exchange, and conditional statistics. This paper accepts those records and does not attribute the predictive success of quantum theory to cognitive error. Its aim is to audit the reasoning chain from experimental conditions, signal conversion, and instrument records to judgments about wave–particle ontology. The method separately defines source state, process action, process signal, observation signal, recorded data, statistical computation, and model interpretation, then revisits selected cases in that order and recalculates parameters from an atomic wave-packet scattering experiment published in 2025. Period analysis begins with the frequency of a specified signal mode and distinguishes carrier period, wave-packet duration, pulse repetition interval, detector time resolution, event interval, quantum-state occupation, and an observer’s temporal integration. The case audits show that localized clicks and accumulated interference distributions constrain different statistical levels; conditional subsamples in path-marking experiments do not replace the unsorted ensemble; and coherent fractions and path information in atomic wave-packet scattering depend on explicit model mappings. The evidence supports a limited conclusion: experimental records alone do not uniquely entail that light switches between two mutually exclusive ontological identities. Moving from model comparison to a universal ontological judgment requires additional argument. This paper does not claim that signal-identification bias caused the historical development of wave–particle duality, nor does it aim to eliminate quantum probability. The Discussion briefly introduces a candidate process picture in which continuous transmission and localized records coexist. Evidence reliability, scope, and limitations are summarized at the end. The paper closes the logic of the experimental inference chain; it does not provide quantitative constitutive closure for the candidate explanation.

Oct 14, 20260 citations

Quantum computation

Lov K. Grover

As device structures get smaller quantum mechanical effects predominate. About twenty years ago it was shown that it was possible to redesign devices so that they could still carry out the same functions. Recently it has been shown that the processing speed of computers based on quantum mechanics is indeed far superior to their classical counterparts for some important applications. This paper introduces quantum mechanics and shows how this can be used for computation.

IEEE PotentialsJan 1, 19997 citations

The Future of Quantum Information Processing

Jelena Stajic

Quantum mini-toc In a world overwhelmed by increasing amounts of data, finding new ways to store and process information has become a necessity. Conventional silicon-based electronics has experienced rapid and steady growth, thanks to the progressive miniaturization of its basic component, the transistor, but that trend cannot continue indefinitely. ![Figure][1] CREDIT: PHOTO: CURT SUPLEE AND EMILY EDWARDS, JOINT QUANTUM INSTITUTE AND UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND; CHIP FABRICATION: SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES WITH SUPPORT FROM THE INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS ACTIVITY In conventional devices, information is stored and manipulated in binary form: The elementary components of these devices—the so-called bits—have two states, each of which encodes the binary 0 or 1. To move beyond the binary system, one can exploit the laws of quantum mechanics. A quantum-mechanical object with two energy levels at its disposal can occupy either of those two levels, but also an arbitrary combination (superposition) of the two, much like an electron in a two-slit experiment can go through both slits at once. This results in infinitely many quantum states that a single quantum bit, or qubit, can take; together with another strange property of quantum mechanics—entanglement—it allows for a much more powerful information platform than is possible with conventional components. Quantum information processing (QIP) uses qubits as its basic information units. QIP has many facets, from quantum simulation, to cryptography, to quantum computation, which is expected to solve problems more complex than those within the capabilities of conventional computers. To be useful for QIP, a qubit needs to be both isolated from its environment and tightly controllable, which places stringent requirements on its physical realization. But this is only the first step; to build a quantum computer, for example, we must also have a scalable architecture and error correction that can be performed in parallel with computation; in addition, efficient quantum algorithms must exist for solving the problem at hand—a considerable theoretical challenge. A number of qubit types have been proposed and experimentally realized that satisfy at least some of these criteria, and tremendous progress has been made over the past decade in improving the figures of merit, such as the coherence time. In this special section, four Reviews look into the future of QIP in some of its most promising physical realizations. On p. [1164][2], Monroe and Kim discuss the challenges of scaling trapped ion architectures to hundreds and thousands of qubits and beyond. Devoret and Schoelkopf (p. [1169][3]) speculate on the future of superconducting circuits, whereas Awschalom et al. (p. [1174][4]) focus on the many promising qubit flavors based on spins in semiconductors. Finally, Stern and Lindner (p. [1179][5]) lay out the prospects for quantum computation using the entirely different approach of topologically protected states. The future of QIP appears bright in spite of the many remaining challenges. As a bonus, overcoming these challenges will probably also advance basic research. [1]: pending:yes [2]: /lookup/volpage/339/1164?iss=6124 [3]: /lookup/volpage/339/1169?iss=6124 [4]: /lookup/volpage/339/1174?iss=6124 [5]: /lookup/volpage/339/1179?iss=6124

ScienceMar 7, 201368 citations

CAN QUANTUM MECHANICS HELP DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING?

Anne Broadbent, Alain Tapp

We present a brief survey of results where quantum information processing is useful for performing distributed computation tasks. We describe problems that are impossible to solve using classical resources but that become feasible with the help of quantum mechanics. We also give examples where the use of quantum information significantly reduces the need for communication. The main focus of the survey is on communication complexity but we also address other distributed tasks.

International Journal of Quantum InformationFeb 1, 20101 citation

Can quantum mechanics help distributed computing?

Anne Broadbent, Alain Tapp

We present a brief survey of results where quantum information processing is useful to solve distributed computation tasks. We describe problems that are impossible to solve using classical resources but that become feasible with the help of quantum mechanics. We also give examples where the use of quantum information significantly reduces the need for communication. The main focus of the survey is on communication complexity but we also address other distributed tasks.

arXiv:0810.5317ACM SIGACT NewsSep 1, 200828 citations