Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in physics. M, Monographs

Solution of a Quantum Mechanical N-Body Problem

Published Jan 1, 1992• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-47274-2_3

Related papers

Solution of an Exactly Solvable Quantum Mechanical N-Body Problem

Jacob Katriel, Gh. Adam

American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1971•0 citations

Solution of an exactly solvable quantum-mechanical three-body problem

Emil Coffou

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Jun 1, 1969•1 citation

The quantum mechanical few-body problem

John W. Norbury

A solution to quantum mechanical problems of two, three, and four bodies is discussed from the point of view of two-body harmonic oscillator forces. An exact solution to the three- and four-body problems is found for harmonic oscillator forces, assuming equal masses. The aim of the discussion is to make students aware of the real difficulties of the few-body problem.

American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1989•5 citations

On the quantum mechanical n-body problem

Klaus Hepp

Helvetica Physica Acta (Switzerland)•May 16, 1969•10 citations

Mind-Body Problem; A Final Solution by Quantum Language

Shiro Ishikawa

Recently we proposed “quantum language, which was not only characterized as the metaphysical and linguistic turn of quantum mechanics but also the linguistic turn of Descartes=Kant epistemology. If this turn is regarded as progress in the history of Western philosophy, we should study the linguistic mind-body problem more than the epistemological mind-body problem. In this paper we show that to solve the mind-body problem and to propose measurement axiom in quantum language are equivalent. Since our approach is within dualistic idealism, we believe that our linguistic solution is the only true solution ( i.e., even if the other solutions exist, they are not in philosophy but in science).

•Apr 1, 2017•0 citations

A Final Solution to the Mind-Body Problem by Quantum Language

Shiro Ishikawa

Recently we proposed “quantum language”, which was not only characterized as the metaphysical and linguistic turn of quantum mechanics but also the linguistic turn of Descartes = Kant epistemology. And further we believe that quantum language is the only scientifically successful theory in dualistic idealism. If this turn is regarded as progress in the history of western philosophy (i.e., if “philosophical progress” is defined by “approaching to quantum language”), we should study the linguistic mind-body problem more than the epistemological mind-body problem. In this paper, we show that to solve the mind-body problem and to propose “measurement axiom” in quantum language are equivalent. Since our approach is always within dualistic idealism, we believe that our linguistic answer is the only true solution to the mind-body problem.

Journal of Quantum Information Science•Jan 1, 2017•8 citations
Recently we proposed “quantum language, which was not only characterized as the metaphysical and linguistic turn of quantum mechanics but also the linguistic turn of Descartes=Kant epistemology. If this turn is regarded as progress in the history of Western philosophy, we should study the linguistic mind-body problem more than the epistemological mind-body problem. In this paper we show that to solve the mind-body problem and to propose measurement axiom in quantum language are equivalent. Since our approach is within dualistic idealism, we believe that our linguistic solution is the only true solution ( i.e., even if the other solutions exist, they are not in philosophy but in science).
Recently we proposed “quantum language”, which was not only characterized as the metaphysical and linguistic turn of quantum mechanics but also the linguistic turn of Descartes = Kant epistemology. And further we believe that quantum language is the only scientifically successful theory in dualistic idealism. If this turn is regarded as progress in the history of western philosophy (i.e., if “philosophical progress” is defined by “approaching to quantum language”), we should study the linguistic mind-body problem more than the epistemological mind-body problem. In this paper, we show that to solve the mind-body problem and to propose “measurement axiom” in quantum language are equivalent. Since our approach is always within dualistic idealism, we believe that our linguistic answer is the only true solution to the mind-body problem.