Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks

Clifford codes

Published Feb 14, 2002• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Quantum error control codes allow to detect and correct errors that are due to decoherence effects. We review some basic properties of these codes and give some constructions. Our main focus will be on a construction of quantum error control codes that have been introduced by Knill in 1996 with the intention to generalize stabilizer codes. These so-called Clifford codes can be constructed and analyzed with tools from representation theory of finite groups. We show that a large class of Clifford codes are actually stabilizer codes. And we construct the smallest example of a Clifford code that is not a stabilizer code.

DOI
10.1201/9781420035377-11

Related papers

Clifford codes

Andreas Klappenecker, Martin Rötteler

Quantum error control codes allow to detect and correct errors that are due to decoherence effects. We review some basic properties of these codes and give some constructions. Our main focus will be on a construction of quantum error control codes that have been introduced by Knill in 1996 with the intention to generalize stabilizer codes. These so-called Clifford codes can be constructed and analyzed with tools from representation theory of finite groups. We show that a large class of Clifford codes are actually stabilizer codes. And we construct the smallest example of a Clifford code that is not a stabilizer code.

Computational matematics series/Computational mathematics series•Feb 14, 2002•13 citations

Clifford Code Constructions of Operator Quantum Error-Correcting Codes

Andreas Klappenecker, Pradeep Kiran Sarvepalli

Recently, operator quantum error-correcting codes have been proposed to unify and generalize decoherence free subspaces, noiseless subsystems, and quantum error-correcting codes. This correspondence introduces a natural construction of such codes in terms of Clifford codes, an elegant generalization of stabilizer codes due to Knill. Character-theoretic methods are used to derive a simple method to construct operator quantum error-correcting codes from any classical additive code over a finite field, which obviates the need for self-orthogonal codes.

arXiv:quant-ph/0604161•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Dec 1, 2008•37 citations

On the Fourier Transform Approach to Quantum Error Control

Hari Dilip Kumar

Quantum codes are subspaces of the state space of a quantum system that are used to protect quantum information. Some common classes of quantum codes are stabilizer (or additive) codes, non-stabilizer (or non-additive) codes obtained from stabilizer codes, and Clifford codes. These are analyzed in a framework using the Fourier transform on finite groups, the finite group in question being a subgroup of the quantum error group considered. All the classes of codes that can be obtained in this framework are explored, including codes more general than Clifford codes. The error detection properties of one of these more general classes ("direct sums of translates of Clifford codes") are characterized. Examples codes are constructed, and computer code search results presented and analysed.

arXiv:1208.4907•Aug 24, 2012•0 citations

Remarks on clifford codes

Andreas Klappenecker, Martin Rötteler

Clifford codes are quantum error control codes that generalize stabilizer codes. These codes were introduced in 1996 by Knill, but only a single nonstabilizer Clifford code was known to date. We derive a necessary and sufficient condition that allows one to decide when a Clifford code is a stabilizer code. We compile a table of all true Clifford codes for error groups of small order

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Dec 23, 2004•2 citations

Quantum error correcting codes: From stabilizer codes to induced codes

Edward A. Loeb

The first large class of quantum error-correcting codes that was constructed is the class of stabilizer codes. The construction method used for these codes is based on finding abelian subgroups of general Pauli groups. Stabilizer codes are a special case of a more general class of quantum error-correcting codes---Clifford codes. The construction technique for Clifford codes generalizes the stabilizer code construction by introducing abstract error groups. Abstract error groups generalize the Pauli groups so that codes can be constructed for quantum systems with any dimension. Clifford codes are thus constructed by finding normal subgroups of abstract error groups. In this dissertation we show that Clifford codes are a special case of a larger class of codes, which we refer to as induced codes. In addition to this new construction method, we also present some new results pertaining to a subclass of stabilizer codes called degenerate stabilizer codes.

•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Nonbinary Stabilizer Codes

Pradeep Kiran Sarvepalli, Salah A. Aly

Abstract Recently, the field of quantum error-correcting codes has rapidly emerged as an important discipline. As quantum information is extremely sensitive to noise, it seems unlikely that any large scale quantum computation is feasible without quantum error-correction. In this paper we give a brief exposition of the theory of quantum stabilizer codes. We review the stabilizer formalism of quantum codes, establish the connection between classical codes and stabilizer codes and the main methods for constructing quantum codes from classical codes. In addition to the expository part, we include new results that cannot be found elsewhere. Specifically, after reviewing some important bounds for quantum codes, we prove the nonexistence of pure perfect quantum stabilizer codes with minimum distance greater than 3. Finally, we illustrate the general methods of constructing quantum codes from classical codes by explicitly constructing two new families of quantum codes and conclude by showing how to construct new quantum codes by shortening.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Sep 19, 2007•0 citations
Abstract Quantum error control codes allow to detect and correct errors that are due to decoherence effects. We review some basic properties of these codes and give some constructions. Our main focus will be on a construction of quantum error control codes that have been introduced by Knill in 1996 with the intention to generalize stabilizer codes. These so-called Clifford codes can be constructed and analyzed with tools from representation theory of finite groups. We show that a large class of Clifford codes are actually stabilizer codes. And we construct the smallest example of a Clifford code that is not a stabilizer code.
Quantum error control codes allow to detect and correct errors that are due to decoherence effects. We review some basic properties of these codes and give some constructions. Our main focus will be on a construction of quantum error control codes that have been introduced by Knill in 1996 with the intention to generalize stabilizer codes. These so-called Clifford codes can be constructed and analyzed with tools from representation theory of finite groups. We show that a large class of Clifford codes are actually stabilizer codes. And we construct the smallest example of a Clifford code that is not a stabilizer code.
Recently, operator quantum error-correcting codes have been proposed to unify and generalize decoherence free subspaces, noiseless subsystems, and quantum error-correcting codes. This correspondence introduces a natural construction of such codes in terms of Clifford codes, an elegant generalization of stabilizer codes due to Knill. Character-theoretic methods are used to derive a simple method to construct operator quantum error-correcting codes from any classical additive code over a finite field, which obviates the need for self-orthogonal codes.
Quantum codes are subspaces of the state space of a quantum system that are used to protect quantum information. Some common classes of quantum codes are stabilizer (or additive) codes, non-stabilizer (or non-additive) codes obtained from stabilizer codes, and Clifford codes. These are analyzed in a framework using the Fourier transform on finite groups, the finite group in question being a subgroup of the quantum error group considered. All the classes of codes that can be obtained in this framework are explored, including codes more general than Clifford codes. The error detection properties of one of these more general classes ("direct sums of translates of Clifford codes") are characterized. Examples codes are constructed, and computer code search results presented and analysed.
The first large class of quantum error-correcting codes that was constructed is the class of stabilizer codes. The construction method used for these codes is based on finding abelian subgroups of general Pauli groups. Stabilizer codes are a special case of a more general class of quantum error-correcting codes---Clifford codes. The construction technique for Clifford codes generalizes the stabilizer code construction by introducing abstract error groups. Abstract error groups generalize the Pauli groups so that codes can be constructed for quantum systems with any dimension. Clifford codes are thus constructed by finding normal subgroups of abstract error groups. In this dissertation we show that Clifford codes are a special case of a larger class of codes, which we refer to as induced codes. In addition to this new construction method, we also present some new results pertaining to a subclass of stabilizer codes called degenerate stabilizer codes.
Abstract Recently, the field of quantum error-correcting codes has rapidly emerged as an important discipline. As quantum information is extremely sensitive to noise, it seems unlikely that any large scale quantum computation is feasible without quantum error-correction. In this paper we give a brief exposition of the theory of quantum stabilizer codes. We review the stabilizer formalism of quantum codes, establish the connection between classical codes and stabilizer codes and the main methods for constructing quantum codes from classical codes. In addition to the expository part, we include new results that cannot be found elsewhere. Specifically, after reviewing some important bounds for quantum codes, we prove the nonexistence of pure perfect quantum stabilizer codes with minimum distance greater than 3. Finally, we illustrate the general methods of constructing quantum codes from classical codes by explicitly constructing two new families of quantum codes and conclude by showing how to construct new quantum codes by shortening.