Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Measurement

Measurement unification

Ken Krechmer

Published May 21, 2021• 12 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In many quantum measurement experiments and thought experiments, unexplained results appear. As example, entangled particles appear to interact instantly across distances. A 2018 Measurement paper (Relative Measurement Theory, K. Krechmer, 2018) proposed that the calibration of a measuring apparatus to a reference is required in both quantum measurement models and empirical measurement results. Current quantum measurement models equalize the units but not to a reference. Current empirical measurement indications are equalized to a reference. These two measurements are different. The lack of calibration to a reference in quantum mechanics creates this difference. Including calibration explains the results of the particle spin experiments, quantum teleportation experiments, and Mach-Zehnder interferometer experiments, as well as Mermin's device, Schrödinger's Cat, and other thought experiments.

DOI
10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109625

Related papers

Quantum Entanglement is Explained in Classic Terms

Ken Krechmer

In many quantum measurement experiments and thought experiments, measurement results appear that do not seem to have classic explanations. As example: In quantum particle spin experiments, entangled particles appear to interact instantly across distances; and in interferometer experiments, one measurement result appears to be split over two paths. Currently, these measurement phenomena are treated as unique to quantum mechanics and not understandable in classic physics. Recognizing calibration in theory explains and resolves all the differences that appear to occur between classic and quantum measurements.

•Aug 1, 2021•0 citations

Relative Measurement Theory the Unification of Experimental and Theoretical Measurements

Kenneth R Krechmer

The discontinuous, non-causal and instantaneous changes due to a measurement that appear in quantum mechanics (QM) theory are not consistent with a classical understanding of physical reality, but are completely confirmed by experiments. Relative measurement theory explains why. This paper presents the first formal development of an experimental measurement which includes the uncertainty due to calibration and resolution. The uncertainty due to calibration and resolution, previously considered experimental artifacts, is shown to be equal to the uncertainty that appears in QM theory and experiment. When the calibration to a reference and resolution effects are considered, all the QM measurement discontinuities are consistent with classical explanations.

•Feb 1, 2019•1 citation

Relative measurement theory

Ken Krechmer

The discontinuous, non-causal and instantaneous changes due to a measurement that appear in quantum mechanics (QM) theory are not consistent with a classical understanding of physical reality, but are completely confirmed by experiments. Relative measurement theory explains why. This paper presents the first formal development of an experimental measurement which includes the uncertainty due to calibration and resolution. The uncertainty due to calibration and resolution, previously considered experimental artifacts, is shown to be equal to the uncertainty that appears in QM theory and experiment. When the calibration to a reference and resolution effects are considered, all the QM measurement discontinuities are consistent with classical explanations.

Measurement•Nov 9, 2017•18 citations

Quantum fluctuations, particles and entanglement: A discussion towards the solution of the quantum measurement problems

Kenichi Konishi

The quantum measurement problems are revisited from a new perspective. One of the main ideas of this work is that the basic entities of our world are various types of particles, elementary or composite. It follows that each elementary process, hence each measurement process at its core, is a space–time, pointlike, event. Another key idea is that, when a microsystem [Formula: see text] gets into contact with the experimental device, factorization of [Formula: see text] rapidly fails and entangled mixed states appear. The wave functions for the microsystem-apparatus coupled systems for different measurement outcomes then lack overlapping space–time support. It means that the aftermath of each measurement is a single term in the sum: a “wave function collapse.” Our discussion leading to a diagonal density matrix, [Formula: see text] shows how the information encoded in the wave function [Formula: see text] gets transcribed, via entanglement with the experimental device and environment, into the relative frequencies [Formula: see text] for various experimental results [Formula: see text]. These results represent the first, significant steps towards filling in the logical gaps in the standard interpretation based on Born’s rule, and replacing it with a more natural one. Accepting objective reality of quantum fluctuations, independent of any experiments, and independently of human presence, one renounces the idea that in a fundamental, complete theory of Nature the result of each single experiment must necessarily be predictable. A few well-known puzzles such as the Schrödinger cat conundrum and the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox are briefly reviewed: they can all be naturally explained away.

arXiv:2111.14723•International Journal of Modern Physics A•Jun 14, 2022•8 citations

Calibration to a Reference Determines when Schrödinger's Cats Die

Ken Krechmer

In 1935 E. Schrödinger proposed a thought experiment to illustrate his concerns with superpositions in quantum measurements. It appears in his experiment that a cat is both alive and dead. This paradoxical superposition has not been explained before. The following identifies that calibration to a reference, currently assumed to be only empirical in measurement theory, explains the paradox of Schrödinger's cats.

Qeios•Dec 5, 2023•0 citations

Observing Schrödinger's Cat

Kenneth R Krechmer

: Understanding E. Schrodinger's 1935 tongue-in-cheek thought experiment requires calibrating his observer to the time units of the measurement result. Calibration, a metrology process, defines the units of a measurement result. Without such a definition any measurement is confusing.

•Apr 1, 2020•0 citations
In many quantum measurement experiments and thought experiments, unexplained results appear. As example, entangled particles appear to interact instantly across distances. A 2018 Measurement paper (Relative Measurement Theory, K. Krechmer, 2018) proposed that the calibration of a measuring apparatus to a reference is required in both quantum measurement models and empirical measurement results. Current quantum measurement models equalize the units but not to a reference. Current empirical measurement indications are equalized to a reference. These two measurements are different. The lack of calibration to a reference in quantum mechanics creates this difference. Including calibration explains the results of the particle spin experiments, quantum teleportation experiments, and Mach-Zehnder interferometer experiments, as well as Mermin's device, Schrödinger's Cat, and other thought experiments.
In many quantum measurement experiments and thought experiments, measurement results appear that do not seem to have classic explanations. As example: In quantum particle spin experiments, entangled particles appear to interact instantly across distances; and in interferometer experiments, one measurement result appears to be split over two paths. Currently, these measurement phenomena are treated as unique to quantum mechanics and not understandable in classic physics. Recognizing calibration in theory explains and resolves all the differences that appear to occur between classic and quantum measurements.
The discontinuous, non-causal and instantaneous changes due to a measurement that appear in quantum mechanics (QM) theory are not consistent with a classical understanding of physical reality, but are completely confirmed by experiments. Relative measurement theory explains why. This paper presents the first formal development of an experimental measurement which includes the uncertainty due to calibration and resolution. The uncertainty due to calibration and resolution, previously considered experimental artifacts, is shown to be equal to the uncertainty that appears in QM theory and experiment. When the calibration to a reference and resolution effects are considered, all the QM measurement discontinuities are consistent with classical explanations.
The discontinuous, non-causal and instantaneous changes due to a measurement that appear in quantum mechanics (QM) theory are not consistent with a classical understanding of physical reality, but are completely confirmed by experiments. Relative measurement theory explains why. This paper presents the first formal development of an experimental measurement which includes the uncertainty due to calibration and resolution. The uncertainty due to calibration and resolution, previously considered experimental artifacts, is shown to be equal to the uncertainty that appears in QM theory and experiment. When the calibration to a reference and resolution effects are considered, all the QM measurement discontinuities are consistent with classical explanations.
The quantum measurement problems are revisited from a new perspective. One of the main ideas of this work is that the basic entities of our world are various types of particles, elementary or composite. It follows that each elementary process, hence each measurement process at its core, is a space–time, pointlike, event. Another key idea is that, when a microsystem [Formula: see text] gets into contact with the experimental device, factorization of [Formula: see text] rapidly fails and entangled mixed states appear. The wave functions for the microsystem-apparatus coupled systems for different measurement outcomes then lack overlapping space–time support. It means that the aftermath of each measurement is a single term in the sum: a “wave function collapse.” Our discussion leading to a diagonal density matrix, [Formula: see text] shows how the information encoded in the wave function [Formula: see text] gets transcribed, via entanglement with the experimental device and environment, into the relative frequencies [Formula: see text] for various experimental results [Formula: see text]. These results represent the first, significant steps towards filling in the logical gaps in the standard interpretation based on Born’s rule, and replacing it with a more natural one. Accepting objective reality of quantum fluctuations, independent of any experiments, and independently of human presence, one renounces the idea that in a fundamental, complete theory of Nature the result of each single experiment must necessarily be predictable. A few well-known puzzles such as the Schrödinger cat conundrum and the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox are briefly reviewed: they can all be naturally explained away.