Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics (CCGRRA)

Quantum time

Jonathan Oppenheim

Published Jan 1, 1999• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

After discussing the role of time in both General Relativity and Quantum Gravity, it is argued that even in ordinary Quantum Mechanics, the role of time is ambiguous. A rather surprising result is that measurements of the time-of-arrival of a free particle must always be more inaccurate than 1/E where E is the kinetic energy of the particle. This inaccuracy is not related to the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. It is a dynamical relation which applies to individual measurements of a single quantity.

DOI
10.1063/1.1301593

Related papers

Quantum time

Jonathan Oppenheim

In quantum mechanics, time plays a role unlike any other observable. We find that measuring whether an event happened, and measuring when an event happened are fundamentally different - the two measurements do not correspond to compatible observables and interfere with each other. We also propose a basic limitation on measurements of the arrival time of a free particle given by 1/Ek where Ek is the particle's kinetic energy. The temporal order of events is also an ambiguous concept in quantum mechanics. It is not always possible to determine whether one event lies in the future or past of another event. One cannot measure whether one particle arrives to a particular location before or after another particle if they arrive within a time of 1/E of each other, where E is the total kinetic energy of the two particles. These new inaccuracy limitations are dynamical in nature, and fundamentally different from the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. They refer to individual measurements of a single quantity. It is hoped that by understanding the role of time in quantum mechanics, we may gain new insight into the role of time in a quantum theory of gravity.

•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Minimum Uncertainty for Transit-Time

Jonathan Oppenheim, Benni Reznik, William George Unruh

Using various model clocks it has been shown that the time-of-arrival cannot be measured more accurately than 1/E where E is the kinetic energy of a free particle. However, this result has never been proved. In this paper, we show that a violation of the above limitation for the transit-time, implies a violation of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation.

arXiv:quant-ph/9801034•Jan 16, 1998•2 citations

The role of general relativity in the uncertainty principle

Τ. Padmanabhan

The role played by general relativity in quantum mechanics (especially as regards the uncertainty principle) is investigated. It is confirmed that the validity of time-energy uncertainty does depend on gravitational time dilation. The author also shows that there exists an intrinsic lower bound to the accuracy with which acceleration due to gravity can be measured. The motion of the equivalence principle in quantum mechanics is clarified.

Classical and Quantum Gravity•Sep 1, 1986•18 citations

Measurement of time of arrival in quantum mechanics

Yakir Aharonov, Jonathan Oppenheim, Sandu Popescu +2 more

It is argued that the time of arrival cannot be precisely defined and measured in quantum mechanics. By constructing explicit toy models of a measurement, we show that for a free particle it cannot be measured more accurately then $\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}_{A}\ensuremath{\sim}{1/E}_{k},$ where ${E}_{k}$ is the initial kinetic energy of the particle. With a better accuracy, particles reflect off the measuring device, and the resulting probability distribution becomes distorted. It is shown that a time-of-arrival operator cannot exist, and that approximate time-of-arrival operators do not correspond to the measurements considered here.

arXiv:quant-ph/9709031•Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1998•160 citations

Free will, undecidability, and the problem of time in quantum gravity

Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge A. Pullin

In quantum gravity there is no notion of absolute time. Like all other quantities in the theory, the notion of time has to be introduced "relationally", by studying the behavior of some physical quantities in terms of others chosen as a "clock". We have recently introduced a consistent way of defining time relationally in general relativity. When quantum mechanics is formulated in terms of this new notion of time the resolution of the measurement problem can be implemented via decoherence without the usual pitfalls. The resulting theory has the same experimental results of ordinary quantum mechanics, but every time an event is produced or a measurement happens two alternatives are possible: a) the state collapses; b) the system evolves without changing the state. One therefore has two possible behaviors of the quantum mechanical system and physical observations cannot decide between them, not just as a matter of experimental limitations but as an issue of principle. This first-ever example of fundamental undecidability in physics suggests that nature may behave sometimes as described by one alternative and sometimes as described by another. This in particular may give new vistas on the issue of free will.

arXiv:0903.1859•Mar 10, 2009•4 citations

The solution to the problem of time in quantum gravity also solves the time of arrival problem in quantum mechanics

Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge A. Pullin

Abstract We introduced with coauthors some years ago a solution to the problem of time in quantum gravity which consists in formulating the quantum theory in terms of real clocks. It combines Page and Wootters’ relational proposal with Rovelli’s evolving constants of the motion. Time is associated with an operator and not a classical parameter. We show here that this construction provides a natural solution to the time of arrival problem in quantum mechanics and leads to a well defined time-energy uncertainty relation for the clocks.

arXiv:2204.08371•New Journal of Physics•Apr 14, 2022•7 citations
After discussing the role of time in both General Relativity and Quantum Gravity, it is argued that even in ordinary Quantum Mechanics, the role of time is ambiguous. A rather surprising result is that measurements of the time-of-arrival of a free particle must always be more inaccurate than 1/E where E is the kinetic energy of the particle. This inaccuracy is not related to the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. It is a dynamical relation which applies to individual measurements of a single quantity.
In quantum mechanics, time plays a role unlike any other observable. We find that measuring whether an event happened, and measuring when an event happened are fundamentally different - the two measurements do not correspond to compatible observables and interfere with each other. We also propose a basic limitation on measurements of the arrival time of a free particle given by 1/Ek where Ek is the particle's kinetic energy. The temporal order of events is also an ambiguous concept in quantum mechanics. It is not always possible to determine whether one event lies in the future or past of another event. One cannot measure whether one particle arrives to a particular location before or after another particle if they arrive within a time of 1/E of each other, where E is the total kinetic energy of the two particles. These new inaccuracy limitations are dynamical in nature, and fundamentally different from the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. They refer to individual measurements of a single quantity. It is hoped that by understanding the role of time in quantum mechanics, we may gain new insight into the role of time in a quantum theory of gravity.
It is argued that the time of arrival cannot be precisely defined and measured in quantum mechanics. By constructing explicit toy models of a measurement, we show that for a free particle it cannot be measured more accurately then $\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}_{A}\ensuremath{\sim}{1/E}_{k},$ where Ek{E}_{k}Ek​ is the initial kinetic energy of the particle. With a better accuracy, particles reflect off the measuring device, and the resulting probability distribution becomes distorted. It is shown that a time-of-arrival operator cannot exist, and that approximate time-of-arrival operators do not correspond to the measurements considered here.
In quantum gravity there is no notion of absolute time. Like all other quantities in the theory, the notion of time has to be introduced "relationally", by studying the behavior of some physical quantities in terms of others chosen as a "clock". We have recently introduced a consistent way of defining time relationally in general relativity. When quantum mechanics is formulated in terms of this new notion of time the resolution of the measurement problem can be implemented via decoherence without the usual pitfalls. The resulting theory has the same experimental results of ordinary quantum mechanics, but every time an event is produced or a measurement happens two alternatives are possible: a) the state collapses; b) the system evolves without changing the state. One therefore has two possible behaviors of the quantum mechanical system and physical observations cannot decide between them, not just as a matter of experimental limitations but as an issue of principle. This first-ever example of fundamental undecidability in physics suggests that nature may behave sometimes as described by one alternative and sometimes as described by another. This in particular may give new vistas on the issue of free will.
Abstract We introduced with coauthors some years ago a solution to the problem of time in quantum gravity which consists in formulating the quantum theory in terms of real clocks. It combines Page and Wootters’ relational proposal with Rovelli’s evolving constants of the motion. Time is associated with an operator and not a classical parameter. We show here that this construction provides a natural solution to the time of arrival problem in quantum mechanics and leads to a well defined time-energy uncertainty relation for the clocks.