Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks

The Pauli Principle and Orbitals

Published Feb 1, 2012• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9781848167476_0004

Related papers

Sparsity of the wavefunction from the generalized Pauli exclusion principle

Romit Chakraborty, David A. Mazziotti

Electron occupations that arise from pure quantum states are restricted by a stringent set of conditions that are said to generalize the Pauli exclusion principle. These generalized Pauli constraints (GPCs) define the boundary of the set of one-electron reduced density matrices (1-RDMs) that are derivable from at least one N-electron wavefunction. In this paper, we investigate the sparsity of the Slater-determinant representation of the wavefunction that is a necessary, albeit not sufficient, condition for its 1-RDM to lie on the boundary of the set of pure N-representable 1-RDMs or in other words saturate one of the GPCs. The sparse wavefunction, we show, is exact not only for 3 electrons in 6 orbitals but also for 3 electrons in 8 orbitals. For larger numbers of electrons and/or orbitals in the lowest spin state, the exact wavefunction does not generally saturate one of the GPCs, and hence, the sparse representation is typically an approximation. Because the sparsity of the wavefunction is a necessary but not sufficient condition for saturation of one of the GPCs, optimization of the sparse wavefunction Ansatz to minimize the ground-state energy does not necessarily produce a wavefunction whose 1-RDM exactly saturates one of the GPCs. While the sparse Ansatz can be employed with arbitrary orbitals or optimized orbitals, in this paper, we explore the Ansatz with the natural orbitals from full configuration interaction, which yields an upper bound to the ground-state energy that equals the exact energy for a given basis set if the full-configuration-interaction wavefunction saturates the Ansatz’s GPC. With calculations on the boron isoelectronic sequence, the dinitrogen cation N2+, hydrogen chains, and cyclic conjugated π systems, we examine the quality of the sparse wavefunction Ansatz from the amount of correlation energy recovered.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 5, 2018•12 citations

The Pauli Principle Revisited

Murat Altunbulak, Alexander Klyachko

arXiv:0802.0918•Communications in Mathematical Physics•Jul 3, 2008•156 citations

Role of Pauli Principle

Pure and applied physics•Jan 1, 1969•0 citations

Test of the Pauli Exclusion Principle in the VIP-2 Underground Experiment

Catalina Curceanu, Hexi Shi, Sergio Bartalucci +25 more

The validity of the Pauli exclusion principle—a building block of Quantum Mechanics—is tested for electrons. The VIP (violation of Pauli exclusion principle) and its follow-up VIP-2 experiments at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso search for X-rays from copper atomic transitions that are prohibited by the Pauli exclusion principle. The candidate events—if they exist—originate from the transition of a 2 p orbit electron to the ground state which is already occupied by two electrons. The present limit on the probability for Pauli exclusion principle violation for electrons set by the VIP experiment is 4.7 × 10 − 29 . We report a first result from the VIP-2 experiment improving on the VIP limit, which solidifies the final goal of achieving a two orders of magnitude gain in the long run.

arXiv:1705.02165•Entropy•Jun 24, 2017•21 citations

Structure of the one‐electron reduced density matrix from the generalized P auli exclusion principle

Romit Chakraborty, David A. Mazziotti

The Pauli exclusion principle requires that the occupations of the orbitals lie between zero and one. These Pauli conditions hold for one‐electron reduced density matrices (1‐RDMs) from both open and closed quantum systems. More than 40 years ago, it was recognized that there are additional conditions on the 1‐RDM for closed quantum systems. In this review, we discuss the structure of the 1‐RDM from the generalized Pauli exclusion principle in many‐electron atoms and molecules and the violation of the generalized Pauli principle as a sufficient condition for the openness of a many‐electron quantum system. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•May 15, 2015•24 citations

Two-Electron Atoms — Pauli Principle

T. A. Littlefield, N. Thorley

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1979•0 citations
Electron occupations that arise from pure quantum states are restricted by a stringent set of conditions that are said to generalize the Pauli exclusion principle. These generalized Pauli constraints (GPCs) define the boundary of the set of one-electron reduced density matrices (1-RDMs) that are derivable from at least one N-electron wavefunction. In this paper, we investigate the sparsity of the Slater-determinant representation of the wavefunction that is a necessary, albeit not sufficient, condition for its 1-RDM to lie on the boundary of the set of pure N-representable 1-RDMs or in other words saturate one of the GPCs. The sparse wavefunction, we show, is exact not only for 3 electrons in 6 orbitals but also for 3 electrons in 8 orbitals. For larger numbers of electrons and/or orbitals in the lowest spin state, the exact wavefunction does not generally saturate one of the GPCs, and hence, the sparse representation is typically an approximation. Because the sparsity of the wavefunction is a necessary but not sufficient condition for saturation of one of the GPCs, optimization of the sparse wavefunction Ansatz to minimize the ground-state energy does not necessarily produce a wavefunction whose 1-RDM exactly saturates one of the GPCs. While the sparse Ansatz can be employed with arbitrary orbitals or optimized orbitals, in this paper, we explore the Ansatz with the natural orbitals from full configuration interaction, which yields an upper bound to the ground-state energy that equals the exact energy for a given basis set if the full-configuration-interaction wavefunction saturates the Ansatz’s GPC. With calculations on the boron isoelectronic sequence, the dinitrogen cation N2+, hydrogen chains, and cyclic conjugated π systems, we examine the quality of the sparse wavefunction Ansatz from the amount of correlation energy recovered.
The validity of the Pauli exclusion principle—a building block of Quantum Mechanics—is tested for electrons. The VIP (violation of Pauli exclusion principle) and its follow-up VIP-2 experiments at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso search for X-rays from copper atomic transitions that are prohibited by the Pauli exclusion principle. The candidate events—if they exist—originate from the transition of a 2 p orbit electron to the ground state which is already occupied by two electrons. The present limit on the probability for Pauli exclusion principle violation for electrons set by the VIP experiment is 4.7 × 10 − 29 . We report a first result from the VIP-2 experiment improving on the VIP limit, which solidifies the final goal of achieving a two orders of magnitude gain in the long run.
The Pauli exclusion principle requires that the occupations of the orbitals lie between zero and one. These Pauli conditions hold for one‐electron reduced density matrices (1‐RDMs) from both open and closed quantum systems. More than 40 years ago, it was recognized that there are additional conditions on the 1‐RDM for closed quantum systems. In this review, we discuss the structure of the 1‐RDM from the generalized Pauli exclusion principle in many‐electron atoms and molecules and the violation of the generalized Pauli principle as a sufficient condition for the openness of a many‐electron quantum system. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.