Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks

Chapter 7

Magnetic Field

Published Aug 30, 2004• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This chapter provides a nice application of the formalism of second quantization to the fractional quantum Hall effect. Throughout this chapter we will stay in the operator formalism and make no use of functional integrals. Whereas in the previous chapters we worked in the grand canonical ensemble, the fractional quantum Hall effect is usually discussed in the canonical ensemble which is mainly due to the huge degeneracy of the noninteracting system. For filling factors less than one, a suitable approximation is to consider only the contributions in the lowest Landau level. This projection of the many-body Hamiltonian onto the lowest Landau level can be done very easily with the help of annihilation and creation operators.

DOI
10.1201/9781482286052-6

Related papers

Chapter 2

Second Quantization

In this chapter we introduce the many-body Hamiltonian for the N -electron system and rewrite it in terms of annihilation and creation operators. This rewriting is called second quantization. We introduce the canonical and the grand canonical ensemble which is the framework in which quantum statistical mechanics has to be formulated. By considering the ideal Fermi gas, we try to motivate that the grand canonical ensemble may be more practical for computations than the canonical ensemble.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Aug 30, 2004•0 citations

Second quantization

Yuli V. Nazarov, Jeroen Danon

In this chapter we describe a technique to deal with identical particles that is called second quantization . Despite being a technique, second quantization helps a lot in understanding physics. One can learn and endlessly repeat newspaper-style statements particles are fields , fields are particles without grasping their meaning. Second quantization brings these concepts to an operational level. Since the procedure of second quantization is slightly different for fermions and bosons, we have to treat the two cases separately. We start with considering a system of identical bosons, and introduce creation and annihilation operators (CAPs) that change the number of particles in a given many-particle state, thereby connecting different states in Fock space. We show how to express occupation numbers in terms of CAPs, and then get to the heart of the second quantization: the commutation relations for the bosonic CAPs. As a next step, we construct field operators out of the CAPs and spend quite some time (and energy) presenting the physics of the particles in terms of these field operators. Only afterward, do we explain why all this activity has been called second quantization. In Section 3.4 we then present the same procedure for fermions, and we mainly focus on what is different as compared to bosons. The formalism of second quantization is summarized in Table 3.1.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 3, 2013•0 citations

Projections and correlationsin the fractional quantum Hall effect

Jørgen Fulsebakke

More than 30 years after its surprising experimental discovery, the quantum Hall effect remains one of the most active and interesting fields of research in condensed matter physics. The theory pertaining to the phenomenon comprises a hugely varied and fascinating body of work, incorporating frameworks such as variational trial wavefunctions, topological phases, conformal field theory and more. There are reasons to expect that some phases of the system harbour nonabelian excitations: particles whose interchange affects the state of the whole system in a way depending on the order of exchange. This has been proposed as a suitable basis for noise resistant quantum computing. The excitations are an emergent property of the totality of the system, whose main active constituent is the well understood electron. The electrons act together in such a way as to manifest exotic quasiparticles; these kinds of strong correlations are a general feature of the system. One can argue that the quantum Hall effect shows the limits of reductionism. In this work we focus on trial wavefunctions as descriptions of the phenomenon. Although highly succesful in the past their evaluation is often impeded by a feature known as lowest Landau level projection. We approach the projection from several angles and in this context introduce an effective and general technique termed energy projection. Using this we examine several trial wavefunctions that have been difficult to deal with in the past. The quantity known as the pair correlation function is an important tool for the analysis of wavefunctions. Its study, however, has often been mainly qualitative in the literature. We construct an expansion useful for exact characterisation and comparison of pair correlations and show that it has desirable properties as compared to a similar preexisting expansion. This is then used to scale pair correlation functions to macroscopic sizes.

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

COLLECTIVE FIELD THEORY APPLIED TO THE FRACTIONAL QUANTUM HALL EFFECT

BUNJI SAKITA, Dong-Ning Sheng, Zhao-Bin Su

We present an application of collective field theory to the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE). We first express the condition, that the electrons are all in the lowest Landau level, as a constraint equation for the state functional. We then derive the fractional filling factor from this equation together with the no-free-vortex assumption. A hierarchy of filling factors is derived by using the particle-vortex dual transformations. In the final section we discuss an attempt at a dynamical theory of FQHE, which would justify the no-free-vortex assumption. A derivation of Laughlin’s wave function with and without quasi-hole excitations is also given.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Pseudopotentials for multiparticle interactions in the quantum Hall regime

Steven H. Simon, Edward H. Rezayi, Nigel R. Cooper

In fractional quantum Hall physics, the Hilbert space is projected to a single Landau level and the entire Hamiltonian consists of just the projected interelectron interaction. Haldane's pseudopotential formalism has been an extremely useful tool both for understanding these interactions and for understanding the quantum Hall states that result. In the current paper, we consider the analog of this pseudopotential construction that results from general $M$-body interactions rather than the usual (Coulomb) two-body interaction.

arXiv:cond-mat/0701260•Physical Review B•May 4, 2007•98 citations

Effective hypernetted-chain study of even-denominator-filling state of the fractional quantum Hall effect

Orion Ciftja

The microscopic approach for studying the half-filled state of the fractional quantum Hall effect is based on the idea of proposing a trial Fermi wave function of the Jastrow-Slater form, which is then fully projected onto the lowest Landau level. A simplified starting point is to drop the projection operator and to consider an unprojected wave function. A recent study claims that such a wave function approximated in a Jastrow form may still constitute a good starting point on the study of the half-filled state. In this paper we formalize the effective hypernetted-chain approximation and apply it to the unprojected Fermi wave function, which describes the even-denominator-filling states. We test the above approximation by using the Fermi hypernetted-chain theory, which constitutes the natural choice for the present case. Our results suggest that the approximation of the Slater determinant of plane waves as a Jastrow wave function may not be a very accurate approximation. We conclude that the lowest Landau-level projection operator cannot be neglected if one wants a better quantitative understanding of the phenomena.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Apr 15, 1999•16 citations
This chapter provides a nice application of the formalism of second quantization to the fractional quantum Hall effect. Throughout this chapter we will stay in the operator formalism and make no use of functional integrals. Whereas in the previous chapters we worked in the grand canonical ensemble, the fractional quantum Hall effect is usually discussed in the canonical ensemble which is mainly due to the huge degeneracy of the noninteracting system. For filling factors less than one, a suitable approximation is to consider only the contributions in the lowest Landau level. This projection of the many-body Hamiltonian onto the lowest Landau level can be done very easily with the help of annihilation and creation operators.
In this chapter we describe a technique to deal with identical particles that is called second quantization . Despite being a technique, second quantization helps a lot in understanding physics. One can learn and endlessly repeat newspaper-style statements particles are fields , fields are particles without grasping their meaning. Second quantization brings these concepts to an operational level. Since the procedure of second quantization is slightly different for fermions and bosons, we have to treat the two cases separately. We start with considering a system of identical bosons, and introduce creation and annihilation operators (CAPs) that change the number of particles in a given many-particle state, thereby connecting different states in Fock space. We show how to express occupation numbers in terms of CAPs, and then get to the heart of the second quantization: the commutation relations for the bosonic CAPs. As a next step, we construct field operators out of the CAPs and spend quite some time (and energy) presenting the physics of the particles in terms of these field operators. Only afterward, do we explain why all this activity has been called second quantization. In Section 3.4 we then present the same procedure for fermions, and we mainly focus on what is different as compared to bosons. The formalism of second quantization is summarized in Table 3.1.
More than 30 years after its surprising experimental discovery, the quantum Hall effect remains one of the most active and interesting fields of research in condensed matter physics. The theory pertaining to the phenomenon comprises a hugely varied and fascinating body of work, incorporating frameworks such as variational trial wavefunctions, topological phases, conformal field theory and more. There are reasons to expect that some phases of the system harbour nonabelian excitations: particles whose interchange affects the state of the whole system in a way depending on the order of exchange. This has been proposed as a suitable basis for noise resistant quantum computing. The excitations are an emergent property of the totality of the system, whose main active constituent is the well understood electron. The electrons act together in such a way as to manifest exotic quasiparticles; these kinds of strong correlations are a general feature of the system. One can argue that the quantum Hall effect shows the limits of reductionism. In this work we focus on trial wavefunctions as descriptions of the phenomenon. Although highly succesful in the past their evaluation is often impeded by a feature known as lowest Landau level projection. We approach the projection from several angles and in this context introduce an effective and general technique termed energy projection. Using this we examine several trial wavefunctions that have been difficult to deal with in the past. The quantity known as the pair correlation function is an important tool for the analysis of wavefunctions. Its study, however, has often been mainly qualitative in the literature. We construct an expansion useful for exact characterisation and comparison of pair correlations and show that it has desirable properties as compared to a similar preexisting expansion. This is then used to scale pair correlation functions to macroscopic sizes.
We present an application of collective field theory to the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE). We first express the condition, that the electrons are all in the lowest Landau level, as a constraint equation for the state functional. We then derive the fractional filling factor from this equation together with the no-free-vortex assumption. A hierarchy of filling factors is derived by using the particle-vortex dual transformations. In the final section we discuss an attempt at a dynamical theory of FQHE, which would justify the no-free-vortex assumption. A derivation of Laughlin’s wave function with and without quasi-hole excitations is also given.
In fractional quantum Hall physics, the Hilbert space is projected to a single Landau level and the entire Hamiltonian consists of just the projected interelectron interaction. Haldane's pseudopotential formalism has been an extremely useful tool both for understanding these interactions and for understanding the quantum Hall states that result. In the current paper, we consider the analog of this pseudopotential construction that results from general MMM-body interactions rather than the usual (Coulomb) two-body interaction.
The microscopic approach for studying the half-filled state of the fractional quantum Hall effect is based on the idea of proposing a trial Fermi wave function of the Jastrow-Slater form, which is then fully projected onto the lowest Landau level. A simplified starting point is to drop the projection operator and to consider an unprojected wave function. A recent study claims that such a wave function approximated in a Jastrow form may still constitute a good starting point on the study of the half-filled state. In this paper we formalize the effective hypernetted-chain approximation and apply it to the unprojected Fermi wave function, which describes the even-denominator-filling states. We test the above approximation by using the Fermi hypernetted-chain theory, which constitutes the natural choice for the present case. Our results suggest that the approximation of the Slater determinant of plane waves as a Jastrow wave function may not be a very accurate approximation. We conclude that the lowest Landau-level projection operator cannot be neglected if one wants a better quantitative understanding of the phenomena.