Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Erkenntnis

Quantum Vagueness

Steven French, Décio Krause

Published Jun 9, 2003• 44 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1023921928559

Related papers

Vague identity and quantum indeterminacy

K. Krause

•Jan 1, 1995•2 citations

Quantum indiscernibility without vague identity

Joanna Odrowąż‐Sypniewska

Analysis•Jan 1, 2001•2 citations

Quantum indiscernibility without vague identity

Joanna Odrowąż‐Sypniewska

Analysis•Jan 1, 2001•4 citations

Quantum Causality

Peter J. Riggs

arXiv:0910.2834•Studies in history and philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2009•25 citations

Metaphysical Indeterminacy, Properties, and Quantum Theory

Alisa Bokulich

It has frequently been suggested that quantum mechanics may provide a genuine case of ontic vagueness or metaphysical indeterminacy. However, discussions of quantum theory in the vagueness literature are often cur- sory and, as I shall argue, have in some respects been mis- guided. Hitherto much of the debate over ontic vagueness and quantum theory has centered on the indeterminate construal of ontic vagueness, and whether the quantum phenomenon of entanglement produces particles whose identity is indeterminate. I argue that this way of framing the debate is mistaken. A more thorough ex- amination of quantum theory and the phenomenon of entanglement reveals that quantum mechanics is best in- terpreted as supporting what I call the property construal of ontic vagueness, where vague properties are understood in terms of determinable properties without the corresponding determinates.

Res Philosophica•Jan 1, 2014•64 citations

Quantum Causality

Sergey M. Korotaev, Evgeniy O. Kiktenko

International Symposium Honoring Mathematical Physicist Jean-Pierre Vigier•Oct 16, 2013•1 citation
It has frequently been suggested that quantum mechanics may provide a genuine case of ontic vagueness or metaphysical indeterminacy. However, discussions of quantum theory in the vagueness literature are often cur- sory and, as I shall argue, have in some respects been mis- guided. Hitherto much of the debate over ontic vagueness and quantum theory has centered on the indeterminate construal of ontic vagueness, and whether the quantum phenomenon of entanglement produces particles whose identity is indeterminate. I argue that this way of framing the debate is mistaken. A more thorough ex- amination of quantum theory and the phenomenon of entanglement reveals that quantum mechanics is best in- terpreted as supporting what I call the property construal of ontic vagueness, where vague properties are understood in terms of determinable properties without the corresponding determinates.