Niels Bohr ranks with Einstein among the physicists of the 20th century. He rose to this status through his invention of the quantum theory of the atom and his leadership in its defense and development. He also ranks with Einstein in his humanism and his sense of responsibility to his science and the society that enabled him to create it. The book presents previously unpublished excerpts from extensive correspondence between Bohr and his immediate family and uses it to describe and analyze the psychological and cultural background to his development of quantum theory. The book also contains a reprinting of the three papers of 1913 (the 'Trilogy') in which Bohr worked out the provisional basis of a quantum theory of the atom.
Niels Bohr ranks with Einstein among the physicists of the 20th century. He rose to this status through his invention of the quantum theory of the atom and his leadership in its defense and development. He also ranks with Einstein in his humanism and his sense of responsibility to his science and the society that enabled him to create it. The book presents previously unpublished excerpts from extensive correspondence between Bohr and his immediate family and uses it to describe and analyze the psychological and cultural background to his development of quantum theory. The book also contains a reprinting of the three papers of 1913 (the 'Trilogy') in which Bohr worked out the provisional basis of a quantum theory of the atom.
Quantum theory, the most successful physical theory of all time, provoked intense debate between the twentieth century's two greatest physicists, Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein. Quantum information theory has emerged from intensive study of the structure and interpretation of quantum theory to become one of the fastest growing areas of twenty-first century science. This second edition has been extensively revised and updated to cover recent developments, including the findings of papers published since the well-received first edition. A substantial new chapter is devoted to the development and structure of quantum information theory. Developments in the experimental and theoretical study of Bell's Theorem are also covered in detail, and the accounts of ongoing work have been brought up to date. A fascinating account of the development of quantum theory, this book will appeal to anyone with an interest in the fundamental questions of physics, its philosophy and its history.
This book gives a detailed study of the development and the interpretation given to Niels Bohr's Principle of Correspondence. It also describes the role that this principle played in guiding Bohr's research over the critical period from 1920 to 1927. Quantum mechanics, developed in the 1920s and 1930s by Bohr, Heisenberg, Born, Schrödinger and Dirac, represents one of the most profound turning points in science. This theory required a wholly new kind of physics in which many of the principles, concepts and models representing reality, that had formed the basis of classical physics since Galileo and Newton, had to be abandoned. This book re-examines the birth of quantum mechanics, in particular examining the development of crucial and original insights of Niels Bohr.
SUMMARY. — The formalisms of quantum mechanics, invented in 1925-26, were very quickly and successfully deployed in solving many problems of atomic and molecular physics. For most physicists these successes expressed the physical meaning of the theory. For a few others, mainly German-speaking physicists closely associated with Niels Bohr, quantum mechanics brought a new definition of knowledge applicable to all exercises of the pure and applied reason. In this paper I describe some of the psychological traits of Bohr and the young men he inspired to extend his epistemological teachings to biology, depth psychology, and other fields remote from the quantum theory of the atom. By calling attention to these traits I aim not to belittle Bohr's thought or its extrapolations, but rather to show how an unsystematic philosophy developed in a particular time and place, and with reference to special problems in atomic physics, could have laid claim to universal validity. I conclude with a parallel between Bohr and his band on the one hand and Newton and his immediate disciples on the other.
“How wonderful that we have met with a paradox. Now we have some hope of making progress,” said Niels Bohr with characteristic irony. The quantum view of the atom began with Bohr. Coming from Denmark, he worked with Rutherford, who although famously skeptical about theoreticians, supported him. Max Planck had previously introduced the idea of the quantum, and Einstein had extended it from matter to light, but Bohr’s proposal that electrons can adjust their orbits only by quantum leaps was revolutionary. The next revolution was Schrödinger’s description of electrons as waves instead of particles. This led to recognition of the wave–particle duality. The rest of the 20th century was marked by the realization that the apparently fundamental particles of the nucleus, the proton and the neutron, each actually consisted of a series of sub-particles. The wave–particle duality created a baffling series of paradoxes. Following revolutions tended to be driven by theoreticians, and massive team efforts were required to identify the sub-particles experimentally.
At the close of the nineteenth century, we stood on the threshold of one of the greatest periods of science, in which the entire world and understanding of science would be shaken to the core and greatly modified. This explosion of knowledge led ultimately to that same information revolution that we live in today. Planck and Einstein showed that light was not continuous but made of small corpuscles that today we call photons. Einstein changed the understanding of mechanics with his theory of relativity: airplanes became conceivable; radio and television blossomed; and the microelectronics industry, which drives most of modern technology, came into being. New areas of science were greatly expanded and developed, and one of these was quantum mechanics, which is the story to be told here. Yet, the development of quantum mechanics and the leadership of Niels Bohr have distorted the understanding of quantum mechanics in a strange way. There are some who would say that Bohr set back the real understanding of quantum mechanics by half a century. I believe they underestimate his role, and it may be something more like a full century. Whether we call it the Copenhagen interpretation, or the Copenhagen orthodoxy, it is the how for the continuing mysticism provided by Mach that is still remaining in quantum mechanics. It is not the why. Why it perseveres and why it was forced on the field in the first place is an important perception to be studied. In this book, I want to trace the development of quantum mechanics and try to uncover the why.
Containing the proceedings of the symposium held by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the birth of Niels Bohr, this collection was first published in 1988. More than any other individual, Bohr was responsible for the development of quantum mechanics and for many of its applications in the pursuit of fundamental understanding of physical reality. In addition to his unique role in the discovery and elucidation of quantum theory, Bohr led the study of the fission of nuclei and was greatly concerned with the impact of the existence of the atomic bomb in the post-World War II era. This unique volume provides a panoramic view of modern physics, some of the philosophical issues associated with quantum theory, the impact of this momentous scientific development on the political circumstance of the Cold War Era and the qualities of a superlative scientist.