Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science News

Quantum Mechanics Gets Real

David Lindley

Published Mar 1, 1997• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2307/3980659

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics Gets Bigger

Science•Oct 27, 2000•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Reality

Princeton University Press eBooks•Jan 12, 2021•31 citations

A Royal Road to Quantum Mechanics (or Thereabouts)

Alexander Wilce

This paper fails to derive quantum mechanics from a few simple postulates. But it gets very close --- and it does so without much exertion. More exactly, I obtain a representation of finite-dimensional probabilistic systems in terms of euclidean Jordan algebras, in a strikingly easy way, from simple assumptions. This provides a framework within which real, complex and quaternionic QM can play happily together, and allows some --- but not too much --- room for more exotic alternatives.

•Jun 29, 2016•0 citations

Quantum mechanics and reality

Bryce Seligman DeWitt

Princeton University Press eBooks•Mar 25, 2025•16 citations

Getting Real about Quantum Mechanics

Laura Ruetsche

Scientific realists believe, of successful scientific theories, that they’re at least approximately true. Quantum mechanics (QM) lays credible claim to being the most successful theory in the history of human science. But what does a scientific realist believe when she believes QM? And what can we learn about the scientific realism debate from the fact that that debate, conducted in abstraction, appears incapable of settling what a realist about QM should believe when she believes QM? This contribution explores both questions.

Routledge eBooks•Nov 22, 2017•5 citations

Quantum Mechanics and the Real World

Luis de la Peña, Ana Marı́a Cetto

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations
Scientific realists believe, of successful scientific theories, that they’re at least approximately true. Quantum mechanics (QM) lays credible claim to being the most successful theory in the history of human science. But what does a scientific realist believe when she believes QM? And what can we learn about the scientific realism debate from the fact that that debate, conducted in abstraction, appears incapable of settling what a realist about QM should believe when she believes QM? This contribution explores both questions.