Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Elsevier eBooks

THE COHERENT STATES

Published Jan 1, 1984• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-08-026523-0.50022-9

Related papers

SOME APPLICATIONS OF COHERENT STATES.

Tom Kibble

•Oct 31, 1968•3 citations

COHERENT STATES: HOW FAR CAN ONE GO?

J. -P. Antoine

•May 1, 1994•0 citations

COHERENT STATES: A GENERAL FORMALISM

Jean-Pierre Antoine

Workshop on Geometric Methods in Physics (WGMP)•Oct 1, 1993•1 citation

COHERENT AND SQUEEZED STATES

World Scientific lecture notes in physics•Mar 1, 1991•0 citations

COHERENT STATES, CHAOS, AND INFORMATION

Eric J. Heller, Steven Tomsovic

•May 1, 1994•1 citation

"Nonclassical" states in quantum physics: brief historical review V. V Dodonov, V I Man'ko

V.V. Dodonov, V.I. Man'ko

COHERENT AND " N O N C L A S S I C A L " STATES 3 4 BRIEF HISTORY OF NONCLASSICAL STATES COHERENT AND " N O N C L A S S I C A L " STATES 5 6 BRIEF HISTORY OF NONCLASSICAL STATES CHILDHOOD OF SQUEEZED STATES 7 8 BRIEF HISTORY OF NONCLASSICAL STATES COHERENT STATES OF NONSTATIONARY OSCILLATORS 9 NON-GAUSSIAN OSCILLATOR STATES 11 12 BRIEF HISTORY OF NONCLASSICAL STATES COHERENT PHASE STATES 13 in the last decade of the 20th century (see the paragraph on photon-added states \nin section 3). Lerner [120] noticed that the commutation relations (32) do not \ndetermine the operators C, S uniquely. Earlier, the same observation was made \nby Wigner [121] with respect to the triple {n, a, a*} (see the next section). In the \ngeneral case, besides the "polar decomposition" (31), which is equivalent to the \nrelations E-\\n) = (1-Sn0)\\n - 1), E+\\n) = |n + 1), (35) one can define operator U = C + iS via the relation U\\n) = f(n)\\n -1), \nwhere function f(n) may be arbitrary enough, being restricted by the requirement /(0) =0 and certain other constraints which ensure that the spectra of the \n"cosine" and "sine" operators belong to the interval (—1,1). The properties of \nLerner's construction were studied in [122].

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 13, 2003•1 citation
COHERENT AND " N O N C L A S S I C A L " STATES 3 4 BRIEF HISTORY OF NONCLASSICAL STATES COHERENT AND " N O N C L A S S I C A L " STATES 5 6 BRIEF HISTORY OF NONCLASSICAL STATES CHILDHOOD OF SQUEEZED STATES 7 8 BRIEF HISTORY OF NONCLASSICAL STATES COHERENT STATES OF NONSTATIONARY OSCILLATORS 9 NON-GAUSSIAN OSCILLATOR STATES 11 12 BRIEF HISTORY OF NONCLASSICAL STATES COHERENT PHASE STATES 13 in the last decade of the 20th century (see the paragraph on photon-added states \nin section 3). Lerner [120] noticed that the commutation relations (32) do not \ndetermine the operators C, S uniquely. Earlier, the same observation was made \nby Wigner [121] with respect to the triple {n, a, a*} (see the next section). In the \ngeneral case, besides the "polar decomposition" (31), which is equivalent to the \nrelations E-\\n) = (1-Sn0)\\n - 1), E+\\n) = |n + 1), (35) one can define operator U = C + iS via the relation U\\n) = f(n)\\n -1), \nwhere function f(n) may be arbitrary enough, being restricted by the requirement /(0) =0 and certain other constraints which ensure that the spectra of the \n"cosine" and "sine" operators belong to the interval (—1,1). The properties of \nLerner's construction were studied in [122].