Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

On the isomorphism of a ?quantum logic? with the logic of the projections in a hilbert space

Renzo Cirelli, Paolo Cotta-Ramusino

Published Jan 1, 1973• 13 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00671575

Related papers

On the isomorphism of a quantum logic with the logic of the projections in a Hilbert space. II

Renzo Cirelli, Paolo Cotta-Ramusino, E. Novati

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 1974•10 citations

Quantum logics and hilbert space

Sylvia Pulmannová

Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 1994•7 citations

Embedding quantum logics in Hilbert space

Stanley Gudder, John R. Michel

Letters in Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 1979•8 citations

An Introduction to Hilbert Space and Quantum Logic

David W. Cohen

Problem books in mathematics•Jan 1, 1989•115 citations

Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces

B. P. Lanyon, Marco Barbieri, Marcelo Pereira de Almeida +7 more

arXiv:0804.0272•Nature Physics•Dec 7, 2008•754 citations

The Birth of quantum logic

Miklós Rédei

By quoting extensively from unpublished letters written by John von Neumann to Garret Birkhoff during the preparatory phase (in 1935) of their ground-breaking 1936 paper that established quantum logic, the main steps in the thought process leading to the 1936 Birkhoff–von Neumann paper are reconstructed. The reconstruction makes it clear why Birkhoff and von Neumann rejected the notion of quantum logic as the projection lattice of an infinite dimensional complex Hilbert space and why they postulated in their 1936 paper that the quantum propositional system should be isomorphic to an abstract projective geometry. Looking at the paper now I see, that I forgot to say this, which should be said somewhere in the first §: That while common logics did apply to quantum mechanics, if the notion of simultaneous measurability is introduced as an auxiliary notion, we wished to construct a logical system, which applies directly to quantum mechanics – without any extraneous secondary notions like simultaneous measurability. And in order to have such a consequent, one-piece system of logics, we must change the classical class calculus of logics. (J. von Neumann to G. Birkhoff, November 21, 1935)

History and Philosophy of Logic•Mar 30, 2007•9 citations
By quoting extensively from unpublished letters written by John von Neumann to Garret Birkhoff during the preparatory phase (in 1935) of their ground-breaking 1936 paper that established quantum logic, the main steps in the thought process leading to the 1936 Birkhoff–von Neumann paper are reconstructed. The reconstruction makes it clear why Birkhoff and von Neumann rejected the notion of quantum logic as the projection lattice of an infinite dimensional complex Hilbert space and why they postulated in their 1936 paper that the quantum propositional system should be isomorphic to an abstract projective geometry. Looking at the paper now I see, that I forgot to say this, which should be said somewhere in the first §: That while common logics did apply to quantum mechanics, if the notion of simultaneous measurability is introduced as an auxiliary notion, we wished to construct a logical system, which applies directly to quantum mechanics – without any extraneous secondary notions like simultaneous measurability. And in order to have such a consequent, one-piece system of logics, we must change the classical class calculus of logics. (J. von Neumann to G. Birkhoff, November 21, 1935)