Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks

Tangled Light

Brian Clegg

Published Jan 1, 2008• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Back in 1935, Albert Einstein had thrown down a gauntlet to the champions of quantum theory. He had realized that if quantum theory were true it should be possible for two photons separated to opposite sides of the Universe to influence each other. This was such a blatant contradiction of special relativity that he was sure that his EPR paper on this ‘quantum entanglement’ effect would spell the end of quantum physics and a return to sanity. Einstein was rarely wrong when it came to science, but this time he was wonderfully far off the mark.

DOI
10.1007/978-1-349-99581-3_10

Related papers

An Interpretation of Quantum Entanglement and the Nature of the Universe

JunSteed Huang, JiaminMoran Huang, GuangQian Lu

Albert Einstein found that, for two particles coming from the same source, when the state of one changes, that of the other may change at the same time, no matter how far they are apart from each other.This superluminal phenomenon totally violates the special theory of relativity which says nothing's speed exceeds the limit of light speed, what's more, as of today, nobody has made a satisfying explanation of this strange phenomenon, not even Einstein's own general relativity.We bring forward our novel view of this long pending dilemma based on the observations of the latest physical lab reports and by summarizing various theories of information, computer science, communications, religion and physics itself.We call it Super General Relativity for now.

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research•Jan 1, 2014•2 citations

Postwar Hostilities

Jim Baggott, John L. Heilbron

Abstract World War II drove several of the founders to Britain or the US. Foundational questions returned with renewed energy in the early postwar years when significant anniversaries came due. The usual suspects rejoined the debate. In the volume celebrating his 70th birthday, Einstein returned to the EPR paper. To its main point, which had been ‘buried alive, so to speak, by erudition’, he now brought exceptional clarity. If the two entangled particles are considered separable and ‘locally real’, then they must communicate via some peculiar mechanism of action at a distance. If they cannot be considered as separable a gaping explanatory hole opens. Either way, quantum theory is not up to the task. But the world of physics, now dominated by America, had moved on. Physicists ‘had no interest in understanding Bohr, and thought that Einstein’s distaste for [quantum mechanics] was just silly . . . It was a very unphilosophical time’.

•Apr 25, 2024•0 citations

Entanglement : the unlikely story of how scientists, mathematicians, and philosophers proved Einstein's spookiest theory

Amir D. Aczel

Plume eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•4 citations

Discussions of the Quantum Superluminality

Huang Zhi-xun

A.Einstein held an opposite attitude towards Quantum Mechanics(QM),which first appeared in 1926 and reached the top in 1935 when he,together with B.Podolsky,N.Rosen published the EPR thesis and it promotes science development in an opposite side.The EPR thesis is based on Special Relativity(SR).Both SR and EPR deny the possibility of faster-than-light.But QM allows the existence of faster-than-light,agreeing to non-locality of QM is the premise of researching in faster-than light.In 1965,during the interview John Bell confided that his unequality was the outcome of EPR thinking,which denied ultra-space effect under EPR thesis,conditions resulted in quite peculiar correlations that QM predicted.The results of Aspect’s experiments were within expectation that QM has never been wrong now and will not in the future despite of strict requirements.Undoubtedly,the experiments proved that Einstein’s ideas didn’t hold water.In Bell’s opinion,to get rid of the difficulties after the announcement of the Aspect’s experiments,it intends to go back to Lorentz and Poincare,and assume that ether existed as a referential system in which matters went faster than light.Bell repeatedly pointed out that be wanted to go back to ether because EPR had predicted there was something faster than light in the background.…… Since 1992,it is reported that there have been many successful faster than light experiments.Some of them are based on quantum tunneling effect;some are based on classic physical phenomena such as evanescent waves,anomalous dispersion.And in 2008,D.Salart et.al.performed a experiment using entangled photons between two villages separated by 18km.In conclusion,the speed of the influence of quantum entanglement would have to exceed than of light by at least four orders of magnitude,i.e.10 4 c ~ 10 7 c.Anyway,this experiment was the summation of discussions about the EPR thesis for a long time.For the past 25 years Quantum Superluminality was one subject of my chief study.In 1985,we proposed the model of quantum potential barrier equivalent circuit.In 1991,we first indicated that there could be the wave velocity v p 0 and v g 0 in the evanescent waves mode of the waveguide below cut off and the book An Introduction to the Theory of waveguide Below Cut-off made me get the First National Scientific and Technology Book Award of China.Moreover,in 2003 we through an experiment in the coaxial photonic crystal,a superluminal group velocity of(1.5 ~ 2.4) c are observed in the stop-band of frequency.In 2005,we suggested the term of General Information Velocity(GIV);and in 2010,we suggested the term of Quantum Superluminality(QS),and also suggested remodel the existing accelerator to discover the superluminal strange electron.Now,this paper discusses some problems of Quantum Superluminality profoundly,such as the velocity definition of the microscopic particles,the relation between the EPR thinking and the faster-than-light research,the interaction speed of the quantum entangle-state,superluminality of the quantum tunneling,the negative wave velocity,QS of the Casimir effect.We show that the unite of Quantum Optics(QO) and classical physical sujects are becoming more important.Since 2000,the negative group velocity experiments are always employing some atomic metal(such as Cs、Ka、Rb) vapor for tests.It make full use of the latest achievement in laser science and technology,then it was modern physical experiment in QO,not the classical physical experiment.The negative group velocity not only the special situation of faster-than-light,but also has the features: the exiting pulse’s peak can appear to exit the medium before the peak of the input pulse enters.So it was different that of classical causality.Although that knowledges and discovers of QS are widen and lively,then it greatly inspired us;but it is not the immediate conclusion that answers some questions about the possibility of material,energy and information according to faster-than-light propagation.To design the ingenious and convincing superluminal experiments are also basic task of scientists.

现代传播:中国传媒大学学报•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Entanglement

Jonathan Allday

Einstein then switched tack from trying to show that quantum theory was inconsistent (did not always give the same answer in similar cases) to proving that it was incomplete (that there were some situations not covered by the theory).

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 3, 2009•0 citations

Relativity Goes Where Einstein Sneered to Tread

Charles Seife

In the 30 December 2002 issue of Physical Review Letters, two physicists show that quantum entanglement, a notion that Einstein loathed, can be deeply affected by the laws of relativity. In fact, when particles are sped up to near the speed of light, entanglement can appear seemingly out of nowhere.

Science•Jan 10, 2003•0 citations
Back in 1935, Albert Einstein had thrown down a gauntlet to the champions of quantum theory. He had realized that if quantum theory were true it should be possible for two photons separated to opposite sides of the Universe to influence each other. This was such a blatant contradiction of special relativity that he was sure that his EPR paper on this ‘quantum entanglement’ effect would spell the end of quantum physics and a return to sanity. Einstein was rarely wrong when it came to science, but this time he was wonderfully far off the mark.
Albert Einstein found that, for two particles coming from the same source, when the state of one changes, that of the other may change at the same time, no matter how far they are apart from each other.This superluminal phenomenon totally violates the special theory of relativity which says nothing's speed exceeds the limit of light speed, what's more, as of today, nobody has made a satisfying explanation of this strange phenomenon, not even Einstein's own general relativity.We bring forward our novel view of this long pending dilemma based on the observations of the latest physical lab reports and by summarizing various theories of information, computer science, communications, religion and physics itself.We call it Super General Relativity for now.
Abstract World War II drove several of the founders to Britain or the US. Foundational questions returned with renewed energy in the early postwar years when significant anniversaries came due. The usual suspects rejoined the debate. In the volume celebrating his 70th birthday, Einstein returned to the EPR paper. To its main point, which had been ‘buried alive, so to speak, by erudition’, he now brought exceptional clarity. If the two entangled particles are considered separable and ‘locally real’, then they must communicate via some peculiar mechanism of action at a distance. If they cannot be considered as separable a gaping explanatory hole opens. Either way, quantum theory is not up to the task. But the world of physics, now dominated by America, had moved on. Physicists ‘had no interest in understanding Bohr, and thought that Einstein’s distaste for [quantum mechanics] was just silly . . . It was a very unphilosophical time’.
A.Einstein held an opposite attitude towards Quantum Mechanics(QM),which first appeared in 1926 and reached the top in 1935 when he,together with B.Podolsky,N.Rosen published the EPR thesis and it promotes science development in an opposite side.The EPR thesis is based on Special Relativity(SR).Both SR and EPR deny the possibility of faster-than-light.But QM allows the existence of faster-than-light,agreeing to non-locality of QM is the premise of researching in faster-than light.In 1965,during the interview John Bell confided that his unequality was the outcome of EPR thinking,which denied ultra-space effect under EPR thesis,conditions resulted in quite peculiar correlations that QM predicted.The results of Aspect’s experiments were within expectation that QM has never been wrong now and will not in the future despite of strict requirements.Undoubtedly,the experiments proved that Einstein’s ideas didn’t hold water.In Bell’s opinion,to get rid of the difficulties after the announcement of the Aspect’s experiments,it intends to go back to Lorentz and Poincare,and assume that ether existed as a referential system in which matters went faster than light.Bell repeatedly pointed out that be wanted to go back to ether because EPR had predicted there was something faster than light in the background.…… Since 1992,it is reported that there have been many successful faster than light experiments.Some of them are based on quantum tunneling effect;some are based on classic physical phenomena such as evanescent waves,anomalous dispersion.And in 2008,D.Salart et.al.performed a experiment using entangled photons between two villages separated by 18km.In conclusion,the speed of the influence of quantum entanglement would have to exceed than of light by at least four orders of magnitude,i.e.10 4 c ~ 10 7 c.Anyway,this experiment was the summation of discussions about the EPR thesis for a long time.For the past 25 years Quantum Superluminality was one subject of my chief study.In 1985,we proposed the model of quantum potential barrier equivalent circuit.In 1991,we first indicated that there could be the wave velocity v p 0 and v g 0 in the evanescent waves mode of the waveguide below cut off and the book An Introduction to the Theory of waveguide Below Cut-off made me get the First National Scientific and Technology Book Award of China.Moreover,in 2003 we through an experiment in the coaxial photonic crystal,a superluminal group velocity of(1.5 ~ 2.4) c are observed in the stop-band of frequency.In 2005,we suggested the term of General Information Velocity(GIV);and in 2010,we suggested the term of Quantum Superluminality(QS),and also suggested remodel the existing accelerator to discover the superluminal strange electron.Now,this paper discusses some problems of Quantum Superluminality profoundly,such as the velocity definition of the microscopic particles,the relation between the EPR thinking and the faster-than-light research,the interaction speed of the quantum entangle-state,superluminality of the quantum tunneling,the negative wave velocity,QS of the Casimir effect.We show that the unite of Quantum Optics(QO) and classical physical sujects are becoming more important.Since 2000,the negative group velocity experiments are always employing some atomic metal(such as Cs、Ka、Rb) vapor for tests.It make full use of the latest achievement in laser science and technology,then it was modern physical experiment in QO,not the classical physical experiment.The negative group velocity not only the special situation of faster-than-light,but also has the features: the exiting pulse’s peak can appear to exit the medium before the peak of the input pulse enters.So it was different that of classical causality.Although that knowledges and discovers of QS are widen and lively,then it greatly inspired us;but it is not the immediate conclusion that answers some questions about the possibility of material,energy and information according to faster-than-light propagation.To design the ingenious and convincing superluminal experiments are also basic task of scientists.